User talk:Andlol17

Hello, Andlol17, and

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Best practices for editors with close associations
• Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hi, I am not employee or any paid user of any organization, I've added my first page/article still people force me to think negative. There are many article with same ref citation amount in same categories. Still they are active instead of mine. Andlol17 (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://failuremag.com/about.

closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here

.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:SleekOwl Media may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Andlol17, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

With due respect to tell you that this page created for veried newspaper and already citation with proper link to identify that page registered under Indian govt broacasting dept. How do you expect that one nespaper has to be more media coverage is it possible? Look at wikipedia and there lots newspaper in bengal with nominal citation. Please bring back that page. Andlol17 (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ranaghat News. Thanks! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what is the reason of moving Sangbad Pratidin to draftspace? The newspaper passes notability, and you could actually do a little Google search and add a few references. Thanks. --Titodutta (talk) 16:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As I see some wikipage has nominal citeation and ref that page is going to mark as draft for improving. I've not delete the page/article, I just marked it as draft because of nominal citeation as newspaper. Yes, I am first time to create a page but removed to draft because of nominal citeation as same.

Which does not mean I take revange on it. If I make page move to draft is my fault then I am really sorry about it.

My intention was to improve wikipage and information that's it. Andlol17 (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• That's not the best way to improve an article. Please do not draftify an article like Sangbad Pratidin, because it is not marking, but moving. The article passes notability. You may or may not agree to this, but that discussion should take place either on article talk page or on AFD. If you are not sure what/how to do, feel free to ask question(s) on
  WikiProject India noticeboard). Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank You for information, Sure I'll try to maintain norms. Yes you'r right some pages with nominal ref but maximum times I've seen some user moved ro draft. Well may be I am wrong. Next time I'll definitely maintain it. Please don't take me otherwise I'dnt made request for deletation. Andlol17 (talk) 17:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.192.76.8.74 (talk) 15:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, As I see some wikipage has nominal citeation and ref that page is going to mark as draft for improving. I've not delete the page/article, I just marked it as draft because of nominal citeation as newspaper. Yes, I am first time to create a page but removed to draft because of nominal citeation as same.

Which does not mean I take revange on it. If I make page move to draft is my fault then I am really sorry about it.

My intention was to improve wikipage and information that's it. Andlol17 (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andlol17, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

I am extremely sorry!! Andlol17 (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your actions are very similar to another user's actions which leads me to believe you are operating that other account as a sock. If you have any evidence that proves against this theory (besides you not knowing how to log in to the other account) please present it at the page linked above.

talk) (Stupidity by me) 18:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, when you reply to messages like these, they were usually added semi-automatically. If you want to make sure your replies are seen then add them to the appropriate place (such as the page that is linked in the message). This has nothing to do with your edits but the possibility of you operating another account without a good reason due to the similarity of edits.

talk) (Stupidity by me) 18:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, I am using campus wifi, where many people using it from same wifi. I am not involve in other account. You can delete or block them. Wikipedia is free encyclopedia with contribution without money reward. I can contribute from my account but there is no logic or intention of creating many account. Andlol17 (talk) 06:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is official logo of some media outlet. Page move to draft should edit draft with this logo? Please correct me if I wrong thanks. Andlol17 (talk) 06:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ranaghat News

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 20:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Ranaghat News

Hello, Andlol17. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ranaghat News

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 19:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]