User talk:Angelinlove78

Hi Angelinlove78. I have reverted this addition of yours to

I also reverted your addition to Delighted. The cast member you added was already present in the list. Please be more careful with your edits. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. sure. Angelinlove78 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Angelinlove78 (talk) 12:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:فروغ.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:فروغ.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

صفحه سریال پوست شیر را مانند سریال آکتور ایجاد کنید. با تشکر 2001:9E8:6D10:1800:E882:7EF4:2FC6:F545 (talk) 20:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Has this been officially released yet? What is the critical reception?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Actor (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angelinlove78! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

File copyright problem with File:ForughFarrokhzad.jpg

Thank you for uploading

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 13:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for bringing to my attention the issue with the copyright and licensing status of File:ForughFarrokhzad.jpg. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

I will update the image description page with the appropriate copyright and licensing information as soon as possible. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's image use policy and will take all necessary steps to ensure that this issue is resolved.

If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your cooperation and for bringing this matter to my attention. Angelinlove78 (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

The article Mohammad Salas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Example of

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Onel5969,

Thank you for bringing the proposed deletion of my article to my attention. I believe that the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines and should not be deleted. The article provides significant coverage of a notable subject, with sources that are reliable and independent of the subject.

I would be happy to address any specific concerns or issues raised in the proposed deletion notice. Please let me know if there is any additional information I can provide to help resolve this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this issue.

Sincerely Angelinlove78 (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear KH-1,

I would like to express my concern about the deletion of my Wikipedia page for Moz on the grounds of being promotional. I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with Moz or any person related to Moz, and I created the page solely for the purpose of providing information about the company on Wikipedia, just like many other Wikipedia pages about Moz in other languages.

I want to emphasize that the page was not created for any promotional purposes, and I did not include any biased or promotional content in the article. The information presented in the page was based on reliable sources and was written in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines.

Therefore, I kindly request you to reconsider the deletion of my Moz page and review it again to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards Angelinlove78 (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if the issues have been resolved so that I can recreate the page for the Wikipedia user.

Moz is a well-known international platform, and like its competitors, I attempted to create a Wikipedia page for it without any promotional intent and without any affiliation with the platform or its administrators.

thanks. Angelinlove78 (talk) 02:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FAQ for organizations

for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Deb,

I would like to express my concern about the deletion of my Wikipedia page for Moz on the grounds of being promotional. I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with Moz or any person related to Moz, and I created the page solely for the purpose of providing information about the company on Wikipedia, just like many other Wikipedia pages about Moz in other languages.

I want to emphasize that the page was not created for any promotional purposes, and I did not include any biased or promotional content in the article. The information presented in the page was based on reliable sources and was written in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines.

Therefore, I kindly request you to reconsider the deletion of my Moz page and review it again to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards Angelinlove78 (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if the issues have been resolved so that I can recreate the page for the Wikipedia user.

Moz is a well-known international platform, and like its competitors, I attempted to create a Wikipedia page for it without any promotional intent and without any affiliation with the platform or its administrators.

thanks. Angelinlove78 (talk) 02:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mehran Mansouri Far

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

KH-1 (talk) 00:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear KH-1,

I am writing to express my concern about the deletion of my article on the grounds of being promotional. I believe that the article in question is not promotional and does not violate any Wikipedia guidelines. Furthermore, I want to clarify that the article is not created by the person it is about and there is no affiliation between me and the subject of the article. The article is based on reliable sources in Persian language.

I kindly request you to reconsider the deletion of my article and review it again to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards 2A03:EF42:4:2BA:93E5:6AF:6BF3:4050 (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear KH-1,

I am writing to express my concern about the deletion of my article on the grounds of being promotional. I believe that the article in question is not promotional and does not violate any Wikipedia guidelines. Furthermore, I want to clarify that the article is not created by the person it is about and there is no affiliation between me and the subject of the article. The article is based on reliable sources in Persian language.

I kindly request you to reconsider the deletion of my article and review it again to ensure that it complies with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards

Angelinlove78 (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if the issues have been resolved so that I can recreate the page for the Wikipedia user.

thanks. Angelinlove78 (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Acroterion,

As an experienced Wikipedia editor, I understand the importance of producing high-quality content that is free from bias and based on reliable sources. I am writing to address any concerns you may have about the articles I have contributed to Wikipedia.

I want to assure you that I have never had any intention of promoting any particular product, service, or organization through my articles. All of my contributions have been made in good faith and are based on reliable sources, such as academic journals, books, and reputable news outlets.

Furthermore, I would like to clarify that I have no personal or professional relationships with any of the individuals or organizations mentioned in my articles. My sole purpose in writing these articles has been to provide accurate and unbiased information to Wikipedia readers.

I take great pride in my contributions to Wikipedia, and I am committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in all of my work. If you have any specific concerns or questions about my articles, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Angelinlove78 (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then please stop using Wikipedia for promotion.

And while we're at it, please do not upload images with obviously wrong or deceptive rationales. For the image of Forugh Farrokhzad to have been licensed as you claimed (life of the photographer plus 100 years), the photographer would have had to have died nine years before Farrokhzad was even born. Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for reaching out. I can assure you that I never intended, nor do I intend, to use Wikipedia for advertising purposes, and I have no affiliation with anyone for whom I create a Wikipedia page. I have removed all sentences that may have implied advertising from my article. Please let me know if there are any other steps I should take to ensure trouble-free publication of my articles.

Regarding the image of Forough Farrokhzad, I did not find a suitable option and therefore chose that image. For images that I have found without proper copyright permission, what options should I choose to avoid any issues?

Thank you for your attention. Angelinlove78 (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Acroterion,

Thank you for reaching out. I can assure you that I never intended, nor do I intend, to use Wikipedia for advertising purposes, and I have no affiliation with anyone for whom I create a Wikipedia page. I have removed all sentences that may have implied advertising from my article. Please let me know if there are any other steps I should take to ensure trouble-free publication of my articles.

Regarding the image of Forough Farrokhzad, I did not find a suitable option and therefore chose that image. For images that I have found without proper copyright permission, what options should I choose to avoid any issues?

Thank you for your attention. Angelinlove78 (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmad Irandoost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Irandoost (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The parts of the article that did not have reliable sources were removed. The remaining content was written based on credible sources. Thank you for your follow-up. Angelinlove78 (talk) 22:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Angelinlove78. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liz! Thank you for notifying me. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining the quality of Wikipedia. Happy editing to you too! Angelinlove78 (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Farda Motors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

An article you recently created,

Hello! Thank you for your guidance. I appreciate it. I have added credible sources to the article. Angelinlove78 (talk) 19:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phil Soper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added additional sources to the article that are relevant to the topic and that have been used and verified in other Wikipedia articles on the same topic. I believe that these sources will strengthen the article and make it more accurate.

I would appreciate it if you could review the article again and let me know if you have any further feedback.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Angelinlove78 (talk) 23:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angelinlove78. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:24, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and for explaining the situation.

I have already submitted a request for undeletion of my draft. I will let you know if I have any further questions. Angelinlove78 (talk) 21:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MAXMOTOR-Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear B-bot,

Thank you for your message.

I understand that the image I uploaded, File:MAXMOTOR-Logo.jpg, may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use.

I uploaded the image for use in the Wikipedia article about MAXMOTOR. The image is the company's logo, and I found it on the company's website. I did not have access to any other source for the logo image.

I understand that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia. I have searched for a replacement image, but I have not been able to find one that is of comparable quality.

I believe that the image is useful for the Wikipedia article about MAXMOTOR. The logo is a recognizable representation of the company, and it helps to identify the company in the article.

I would like to request that the image be allowed to remain on Wikipedia. I am willing to work with the community to find a way to ensure that the image is used in accordance with Wikipedia's policies.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Angelinlove78 (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Tuning frequency. I believe effort would be better spent merging that article's content into Scientific pitch. regards, Just plain Bill (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that merging the content of the

Tuning frequency article into Scientific pitch

is a better use of effort. The two articles are essentially about the same topic, and merging them would allow for more comprehensive coverage of the information.

Thank you Angelinlove78 (talk) 20:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saeed Amidi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, Qwerfjkl (bot). Thank you for your message. I have fixed the errors and added the titles to all the sources. Please check the page again and let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks Angelinlove78 (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See

WP:COI

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phil Soper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

no critcal reception or production details

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Actor (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLI 06:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Milkk7 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gonabadi Dervishes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Milkk7 (talk) 03:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

The notability of this article is unclear because it is not supported by high-quality, reliable source. Reference

WP:RSPSOURCES

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Motor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 02:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Angelinlove78. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naser Parvani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naser Parvani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TLA (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.