User talk:Ant solo

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Antogonist and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ant solo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ant solo, I thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The Antogonist, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Antogonist.

You might like to note that such

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLonelyPather}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLonelyPather (talk) 10:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TheLonelyPather !

What changes do you suggest to improve the article?

Thanks! Antonio J. Sánchez (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ant solo,

Thanks for your message. I am more concerned about the notability of the subject, which is independent from the quality of the article itself. You have five sources here. The IMDb one should not be used (see

WP:IMDB

), and I am concerned if the three sources from RTVE and the other source from musicazul.com are just routine coverages (i.e. they do such coverage for similar new songs / musical projects indifferently). I could be wrong, and you are more than welcome to state your opinion at the AfD page.

Also, you seem to have a similar name with "Antonio Juan Sánchez Martín", the creator of

WP:COI

and put up a conflict-of-interest tag on your user page.

Cheers, -- TheLonelyPather (talk) 21:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Ant solo. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]