User talk:Anup Ramakrishnan

Hello, Anup Ramakrishnan, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

]

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Welcome kit Welcome kit - Swiss Army Knife for newcomers. Register Category:Indian Wikipedians - Indian Wikipedians category. Network WP:INWNB ) Contribute content WikiProject India - Join the group and help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to India. Portal:India - India Kaleidoscope on Wikipedia. WP:INCE ) WP:INCOTW ) Notice board for India-related topics/Category Adoptions - Adopt an India category and better it. WikiProject Deletion sorting/India - Articles related to India listed for deletion. WikiProject Indian cinema - Join the project and contribute to articles on Indian cinema. WikiProject History of India - Join the project and contribute to articles on History of India. WikiProject Politics of India - Join the project and contribute to articles on Politics of India.

deeptrivia (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to

[1] from

Chronologically, Brahmana, Mahabharata and Matsya Purana are written in this order. So we should mention it that way IMO. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think my edits are wrong? Is the previous editor's statements the word of GOD or something? Take a look at what I put in and the assisting refs. I restored some material that was well-substantiated and added more ref(s) just in case. The editor does not seem to know that 1 lakh crore = 1 trillion (Lakh has five zeroes and Crore has seven). There is no place called "Travancore". There is a town called Thiruvananthapuram. We use "in XYZ" where XYZ is a place. Not "at XYZ". That Angkor Wat is the largest structure known to be built in recorded history is mentioned by LiveScience which is a well-known publication. May I know what this one editor popping out of nowhere is allowed to make SO MANY edits in two days and unchallenged? And I who have been editing here for eight years am reverted. I do not have the time now but there is other material too that has been unwarranted-ly removed. Please do not revert like that. Anup Ramakrishnan (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get offended -- Wikipedians undo others' edits all the time. You need to discuss your changes on the talk page per

WP:BRD, as multiple editors have opposed your changes. The problem is that your addition reads like an advertisement. There are separate articles on Angkor Wat and Padmanabhaswamy Temple. Bragging about these temples doesn't belong in the article Vishnu. Also, news articles aren't exactly great sources for such claims -- peer-reviewed academic works are preferred. Like I said, if you disagree, please discuss your changes at Talk:Vishnu rather than simply re-adding them without discussion. utcursch | talk 05:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Ms Sarah Welch doesn't pop-up out of nowhere; she's an established editor with a very good grip on India-related topics and sources. And part of the fun of Wikipedia is that anyone can edit, as long as they make decent edits. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:31, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anup Ramakrishnan. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anup Ramakrishnan. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anup Ramakrishnan. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]