User talk:Aoba47/Archive 15

Congratulations on 3 of Hearts being promoted to FA. Are you considering listing it as part of the Wikicup challenge as you can do so because you nominated it for FAC on 1 January.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think it'll be accepted though, since you worked on it in December 2017. PS, I haven't forgotten about your All Souls FAC. My review is generally in parts and takes a few days to finish. FrB.TG (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your message. I was just about to respond that the FAC would not count as part of the Wikicup as the Wikicup all encompasses work done this year. Almost all of the work done for the 3 of Hearts article was done last year so it would not be acceptable. And take as much time as you need for the review.
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• The rules seem to state that even if you "worked on or nominated [something] an early round, you may still claim points if it is recognised in a later round". So even if you started working on 3 of Hearts in December, it still wasn't put up for nomination in January, which is also when it got promoted; after the competition had already started. This would make it eligible for nomination. PanagiotisZois (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message. I interpreted that part ("If something was worked on or nominated in an early round, you may still claim points if it is recognised in a later round, but you may not claim points for articles you have not worked on during the competition.") as meaning an earlier round of the competition itself rather than prior to the start of the Wikicup. I do not think that the FAC would be applicable due to this rule (Content must have been worked on and nominated during the competition.), though feel free to ask the Wikicup judges to clarify this.
  Aoba47 (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you for hearts on the Main page, TFA today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message!
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

FAC

Yo homie, why did you delete your message about All Souls? I'd love to help with it now that it's the weekend. PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I just don't want to pressure you into doing something if you didn't have the time. I would greatly appreciate it though. Hope you are having a good weekend so far.
  Aoba47 (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I'm afraid not buddy. My grandfather passed away this morning and I don't think I'm in the right state of mind to review anything right now. Only micro-edits for me.

• No worries, I am sorry for your loss.
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article

]

The article

]

Ramandu's Daughter

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ramandu's daughter has been completed.

In the Development and casting section this sentence appears: "Alex Brown of

questioned if the novel's fans would accept the changes made to Ramandu's daughter for the film adaptation, specifically citing how parts of her storyline were adapted out." I was going to change "adapted out" to "omitted" which seems clearer. When I went to check the citation, there is no mention of this in the review although parts of sentences were missing when I viewed it. As well, Tor.com accepts articles from anyone so is probably not considered a reliable source. The publisher is Macmillan, not Tor. I leave this to you to decide.

• I have removed the part due to your suggestion.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Also in this section, why is Brown cited as well as Ford after a quotation attributed to Ford in this sentence: "Paul F. Ford interpreted Lewis' decision not to name Ramandu's daughter as "an indication of the awe in which [he] wanted to surround her." [6][10]

• I had actually found the Ford quote originally in Brown's text and cited it that way, before I tracked down the original source, and just forge to remove it.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

In the Character analysis section Grace Stukenborg of the Odyssey is cited. This is a crowdsourced website where anyone can upload an "article". This would not pass FA standards for reliability, (e.g. Wikipedia is not an accepted source in academic circles either) and a "favorite moment" doesn't pass as criticism.)

• Understandable. This was a later addition as I just wanted to make sure that I found all of the resources that I could possible use. I have removed it.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

In the Religious analysis section this sentence appears: "During his discussion of the film version of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, HuffPost's Carl McColman compared Caspian's return to Lilliandil to one's acceptance of God, writing that the storyline is similar to "all who fully embrace their call will find unique blessings intended for them alone."[22][32] Because I did not understand this as it was written I checked the citation. McColman is not discussing the film, the Huff Post reviewer is and quotes extensively from McColman’s work. My reading of this section is not that Caspian’s return denotes his acceptance of God but rather his acceptance of his unique calling which is decided by God. So, I have removed this section, with an edit you can revert if I am reading this all wrong. Either way, it needs rewriting because of the incorrect attribution noted above.

• Thank you for the note. McColman is listed on the byline for the article, so I assuming he is the one writing the article. This article though would probably be more appropriate for the article on Caspian.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Another thing I noticed is citations 8, 10 and 17 reference a book but do not include a page number. Am I wrong that they should have page numbers - or are you referencing the book as a whole?

• I have used Google Books for looking through sources, and unfortunately, these sources did not have page numbers in Google Books for some reason.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I changed the tenses on any verbs referencing the film or TV series to the present tense which is standard. There appears to be no consensus on whether the writing about an author’s view in a book or journal should be in the present tense – "Paul F. Ford interpreted Lewis' decision…" versus "Paul F. Ford interprets Lewis' decision…" Consistency is the one thing proponents on both sides agree. All the authors in this article are consistently mentioned in the past tense. It may or may not come up during an FA review.

• Thank you for the note. I could not find a straight answer either way about this either.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

That's it I think. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, and good luck with the FA review if/when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 17:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you as always!
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article Time (K. Michelle song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Time (K. Michelle song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article Hood Boy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hood Boy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the seven FAC reviews you did during January. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

When you open a GA review

Aoba47, when you open a GA review, please do not change the status field in the GA nominee template on the article's talk page. When you do that by adding "onreview", you block the bot from doing so, and then it also doesn't transclude the review onto the talk page or notify the nominator that the review has been started. It's fine to edit the GA nominee template to change "onreview" (which the bot will put in the status field) to "onhold" when you put the article on hold—indeed, that's what causes the notification message of the hold to go to the nominator—but please let the bot do its work when you open the review. It runs every 20 minutes, and will know that the review page has been opened in the interim.

This may be why your reviews typically don't also generate "Pass" or "Fail" messages when they close; there's something in the review transclusion step that the bot looks for later when it's trying to figure out whether this was an actual pass or fail or just maintenance, and when it doesn't see it, it treats it as just maintenance. For a pass, that's a problem, since it doesn't automatically send the notification and update the article with the good article icon.

Please start leaving the GA nominee template alone when opening reviews in future. We'll see if this fixes the notification problems and the Pass issues. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Makes sense, thank you for the note. I will make sure to be more careful about it in the future!
  Aoba47 (talk) 01:58, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Question for you, shouldn't all of the award wins and nominations in a music group's article be cited to meet the GA criteria? I'm seeing some with and some without, so I'm a little confused.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I would assume that everything needs to be cited.
  Aoba47 (talk) 01:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Lady Blue copyedit

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Lady Blue (TV series) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 21:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Charmed

Hey Aoba, did you hear the new announcements about the Charmed reboot? It reminded me of the Stillman sisters. XD PanagiotisZois (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Well, I've always been the kind of person who thought you should judge sequels / remakes / spin-offs etc. on their own merits, without comparing them to the original. However, I don't think it possible to succeed in doing so 100%. Additionally, I think it's only fair that I don't judge the show until actually seeing it. Having said that, the only think about the reboot that I find geuienly great is Holly Marie Combs roasting it on Twitter. I mean, why couldn't they just take the comics and animate them? Anime does that all the time. Or focus on the children of the Charmed Ones? PanagiotisZois (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I'm a huge fan of The Lion King films and I would like to give a good review on this, with your permission of course, Aoba.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Left some comments at the GAR in case you did not receive my ping.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

Good articles nom

Hi Aoba, good morning, evening or night. I have just nominated OMG to GA, I'm not sure if this is right, but I would appreciate your opinion about my recent work, and if you have interest, you could even pick it up for a review, I've been working and searching everything about the song to expand and give the best text possible for this. If you check out the article you will see that this is pretty short. So, can you help? Btw, thank you for picking "Write on Me" for a review so quickly. UrbanJE (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• @
  Aoba47: Oh! I'm sorry for this confusion, I thought you had picked it up for a review. But to be honest, it really doesn't matter, I will wait until another user. I completely understand and agree with you. Your attitude to accept my request really surprises me, thank you so much. I've spent these past days working on it, it's a pleasure to see you reviewing this article. ;)—UrbanJE (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• No worries. I have been meaning to reading more about Camila's solo career and this seems like the perfect opportunity to do so lol.
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article Endless Night (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Endless Night (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 09:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article [[the JaneDear girls (album)]] has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you as always!
  Aoba47 (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

"Me Gusta"

Hi there! I remember when you said you heard about the song above by Inna in a GA review you've conducted. Then, the song was not released, but Inna has dropped the music video today (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EH4uaoIbYJk) so I decided to write this to you, in case you're interested in hearing the song in full. Also, my fellow mate Alexandra Stan has released "Mami" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fz1C6milR4), which I dislike a little bit. Just provided you some info on my Romanian music world... Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! I will definitely check those two songs out and let you know what I think.
  Aoba47 (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I hope I don't bother you, but I randomly decided to tell you about that... Have fun listening (especially to "Me Gusta" lol). Best; Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• No worries; I appreciate the message! I really liked "Me Gusta" and the video, but I agree with you and I am meh about "Mami" and I wish that it was better overall (both for the song and the video).
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Question

Hey Aoba, since you've worked on numerous articles about television episodes, I wanted to get your view on my draft for "

]

• Thank you for the message! I will definitely check it out. It definitely inspires me to do another article on a television episode as it has been a minute since I have worked on one. Xena is still one of my favorite shows so I would be more than happy to check it out. I will leave my comments here (if I have any) when I am done. Hope you are doing well!
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• "a minute" XD. Thank you Aoba, I really appreciate it. And I hope you're doing well too. Just so you know though, I still plan on adding more content to the article. I'm just taking things a little slowly. PanagiotisZois (talk) 18:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @PanagiotisZois: I will definitely say it is on the right track. Here are some of my comments below. I hope you find them helpful:

• For the lead, I do not think that you need to separate the last sentence into its own paragraph. Unless you are planning on adding more information, and if that is the case, then it is fine.

• Yeah, I do plan on expanding that. But depending on how many reviews I find and what they say, I may not be able to expand it much. If that happens, I'll just connect the two paragraphs.

• For this part (she's accompanied by her best friend), use "she is" instead of "she's" as contractions are discouraged by Wikipedia policy. Look for contractions throughout the article and replace any that you see.

• Ugh, yeah. I'm always reminded not to do that. Even in essays.

• This is not a comment against your writing (as I honestly believe you are better than I am), but I would suggest putting a request for this at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors once you move this into the main space as it is always helpful to have another set eyes look at it. Certain portions of the article could use some copy-editing.

• Aww, thank you so much, you're very sweet. But trust me, considering I'm the one looking up to you example, literally, you're definately better at writing. I will request for a copy-edit once it's done.

• For this part (features more horror-related elements than previous episodes had), you can just say "previous episode". The "had" part is not necessary.

• Removed.

• The third paragraph of the lead as a lot of great information, but it could use some copy-editing to make it flow better. The content is good, but just play around with the sentence structure and word choice.

• True. I'll probably add a little info regarding filming and then make the necessary changes.

• I have seen the show so I understand the context, but certain parts of the plot summary may be confusing to an unfamiliar reader (i.e. characters such as "Eli" and Eve's past as "Livia" could use a little more context).

• How about: "Eli, Xena's version of Jesus". XD

• I have received a note during the "Barge of the Dead" FAC about whether or not TrekNation is an appropriate source. I am not saying you should remove it, but I would definitely ask around about its reliability.

• I actually thought that Green having worked for TrekNation would increase her reliability. Ugh, it's almost impossible to find reviews for this episode. And Xena episodes in general.

• I would encourage you to find more sources to really prove the notability of the article/episode as that will be one of the first questions when you move this to the main space.

• The more the merrier. :D

• This is definitely on the right track. The structure is really good so far. My main pieces of advice are 1) to continue adding sources to support that the episode is notable enough for its own article and 2) when you are done adding sources, I would go back through and do a copy-edit. Good luck with this! Let me know when you are done with it, as I would love to give it a read. It definitely inspires me to work on an article on a Xena episode (Sorry, I type a lot as I am sure you can tell lol).
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I really, really, appreciate the help Aoba. <3 It's great working with someone on things you love, you know. Who knows, maybe Xena will turn out to be the project we work upon together. It would definately satisfy my wish to work on LGBT-related content that I love as extensively as I had for FD3. And if you need help with any of your projects, let me know. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message, and I always appreciate hearing from you. <3 I would love to work on something Xena-related in the future. I really should work on more LGBT-related content on here. And congrats on all of the work that you have done for FD3; you did wonderful work there! And, as always, feel free to let me know if I can help you with anything.
  Aoba47 (talk) 07:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• The article was given a copyedit. What do you think of it now? I also tried to explain some things like Eli, Eve / Livia and Xena's pinch. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:30, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Everything looks good to me. Great job with it!
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:39, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

Prose in Sasuke Uchiha

Hello. While almost all of the reviews in the Sasuke Uchiha FAC have been going on well, a fellow user, IDV, mentioned issues about whether or not the section "In Naruto" (4 paragraphs) are easy to understand. As a result, both me and Flowerpiep have been trimming that section and rearranged some parts. If you have some free time, could you give it a look? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message. I just looked through it, and I could not find any issues. Great work with the article as a whole.
  Aoba47 (talk) 18:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

If possible, could you voice your opinion in the FAC? There's another user who also said shared your comment.Tintor2 (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Will do.
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Looks like Sasuke's nomination is about to end but I rewrote the reception to fit with what Mike requested. Could you check it or comment about it? I'm not sure if I did it well.Tintor2 (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message. I am not sure if I have the time to give a thorough review of the prose. I would trust Mike's opinion as he is a more experienced editor and reviewer than myself. Good luck with it.
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article Christmas with Friends (India.Arie and Joe Sample album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christmas with Friends (India.Arie and Joe Sample album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The article Candy (Foxy Brown song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Candy (Foxy Brown song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of UrbanJE -- UrbanJE (talk) 13:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

]

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for How Many Licks? at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 21:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you as always!
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

"Candy" (Foxy Brown song)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Candy" (Foxy Brown song) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

"Ultralight Beam"

Hi! I wanted to give personal thanks to you for reviewing "

]

• I am glad that I could help. You have done a wonderful job with the article as it was a very interesting and informative read. Good luck with your future projects!
  Aoba47 (talk) 19:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Carolwood Pacific Railroad FAC

When you have a moment, consider commenting on the FA review for the Carolwood Pacific Railroad article here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carolwood Pacific Railroad/archive1. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 15:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Yes, that's fine. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 20:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Awesome, I look forward to reading it!
  Aoba47 (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Question (again)

On today's episode of Panagiotis asks Aoba a Question XD. Hope I'm not being annoying. I was just curious, do you think people can use their Wikipedia contributions in their portfolios? It's something my friend mentioned when I was showing him some of the articles I worked on, and I think I remember you saying something similar; I think. PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• You are definitely not annoying so don't worry about it. I think that the contributions can be counted as part of a portfolio depending on the context, probably not for an academic field or job, but it could work for other things. I hope that is a helpful answer.
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The article How Many Licks? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:How Many Licks? for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please leave your comments at my ongoing flc? Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Sure thing, I'll perform the review soon. Thanks. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Something About the Night

Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

"Hood Boy" copyedit

Hello, Aoba47. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Hood Boy at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 18:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you as always!
  Aoba47 (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi, Aoba47,

Thank you for your review of the article Wheels of Aurelia. I appreciate your time taken in reviewing the game article. I just had a couple questions regarding the review (I have set in motion rectifying these issues for a possible future GA review), so if you would indulge me, I would appreciate it.

• "For the publisher parameter of the infobox, you do not need to include the person’s full name and can use only the last name as it can be assumed from the developer parameter", and I'm a little bit confused. The game was published and developed by a team called Santa Ragione. The team is actually just two guy Pietro Righi Riva and Nicolò Tedeschi, which I will add to the article. What part of the infobox needs editing.

• Thank you for the clarification. You never make it clear in the prose that this is a team. I misread "Santa Ragione" as a person.
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• You also mentioned that Santa Ragione should be a red link. However, I don't feel like it is a notable topic yet. They only have three games, and this one is the only one that is notable so far. Should I still red link it? Or, should I do what I've done, and red link it in the text, and not in the infobox?

• If you read my review again, I never say that you "should" make it a read link. My comment was (Do you think that it would be worthwhile to have Santa Ragione as a red link?). According to your comment, it makes sense not to make it a red link.
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• You mention MobyGames not being a reliable source, and therefor should remove this from the external links section. Other GAs (Such as Dragon Quest) use this. Is it simply worth removing, or kept due to the amount it gets used.

• I have been given the note in the past that MobyGames as been deemed unreliable. If you look at Dragon Quest for instance, it was passed as a GA in 2007, before MobyGames was probably deemed unreliable.
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you for your feedback once again. I have put the article into the copyeditor guild queue, and will wait for them before I make any more GA attempts. I have written quite a few articles, but never to the GA level, so I appreciate the response.

Also, if you are interested in the game, I'd recommend the iOS version, as it's by far the best experience if you have an apple mobile device. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:53, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the comments and good luck with this article! I may actually try the Mac version through Steam. For some reason, I do not really enjoy playing games on my phone lol. Have a good rest of your week!
  Aoba47 (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• If you're a Mac person, go for it. Thanks for your input. I'm glad I could bring something new to you. :) Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:55, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aoba. I have nominated my fifth FAC and second collaboration with Kailash29792. You peer reviewed this article back in March last year. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I have hoepfully resolved your comments in case you did not receive my ping.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:15, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Aoba47 (talk) 20:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I will do so sometime later today.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 23:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Done. Resolve them.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the seven FAC reviews you did during February. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Nearly a year ago, we interacted when you were submitting a FAC on Faces (Star Trek: Voyager). I awarded you a barnstar. A year later, there was a glorified stub (9 lines of text) on the airline WestJet Encore that I expanded more than 5x to get a DYK (Did You Know) that got over 5,000 views. That prompted me to recently try for FAC. I have never written a FAC. If you have any suggestions or want to review it, by all means, do so or offer hints. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/WestJet_Encore/archive1 Vanguard10 (talk) 03:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for the message. I will definitely review it in the future. I will try to get to it by the end of the week if that is okay with you.
  Aoba47 (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

No worries, no hurry. Being a FAC newbie, I am a little scared. A little hand holding will do. If I become experienced in FACs, then I will be ready for a lion of a critic. Vanguard10 (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I am glad that I can help with it. Good luck with it!
  Aoba47 (talk) 03:34, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

the JaneDear girls (album)

I have promoted the JaneDear girls (album) to GA. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you! I enjoy working on obscure acts and albums. I find it to do all of the research and hopefully draw some people's attention to past artists and their work. Hope you are having a great week so far!
  Aoba47 (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Blindfold Me

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Blindfold Me" has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you!
  Aoba47 (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Orphaned non-free image File:IGotThatAudioSample.ogg

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you so much for your incredibly through GA review of "Rx (Medicate)" as well as your patience throughout the process. And of course, much appreciation for passing the article. Hope we can work again in the future. — Miss Sarita 02:57, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Anytime. I am glad that I could help you with this.
  Aoba47 (talk) 02:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]