User talk:Arazarazli

May 2009

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of South azerbaijan, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://aharli.azeriblog.com/2009/01/09/where-is-south-azerbaijan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 19:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of South azerbaijan

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fre h ley 03:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan (Iran)

Hi, I see you made a

Talk 03:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

May 2009

talk) 21:45, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Southern Azerbaijan. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:49, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Southern Azerbaijan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

South Azerbaijan. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Articles for deletion nomination of Racism in Iran

I have nominated Racism in Iran, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racism in Iran. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Guy (Help!) 13:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

talk) 16:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

talk) 07:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

talk) 17:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I blocked your account for massive edit-warring, at least ten reverts in 24h--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised

discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here

.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks

. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Now I blocked you for a week. First, you are edit-warring in many articles, despite being aware of discretionary sanctions. Second, such edit summaries are plain unacceptable. The next block can very well be for an indefinite duration.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warned, ignored, blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]