User talk:Arjayay/Archive 25

A tag has been placed on Pewdiecake2music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi KylieTastic - having redirected it I was nominating it for deletion when you intervened, giving me an edit conflict - of course I agree - best wishes ; Arjayay (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

• Yup just an edit conflict (I'm sure these are happening more recently) - I've self reverted and put the corrected speedy on it. All good I guess as long as we are keeping junk from main-space - Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, do you have this one in your watchlist? Prone to same commonname disruptive edits, just less frequent than other similar articles. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

No Fylindfotberserk it wasn't (but now is) - I've had to trim my watchlist as they can have problems if they go over about 5000 entries - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. What kind of problems we face if they get over 5,000? I have 8,200+ in my list. I tried trimming them manually but I kinda feel attached to them . So, I've started to set watchlist period (months, weeks) on random articles that are not that important. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fylindfotberserk
In my early days I had "Add pages and files I edit to my watchlist" checked in "Preferences" so it grew very quickly. I'm not sure how many it got to, but it started to take ages to load and refresh, and often appeared in default text (or whatever its real name is, when it is just left-margined text, without all the usual buttons)
I changed my Preferences, trimmed it down, and the problem seemed to clear up. I didn't know about the suggested limit of 5000 until a lot later when I read this thread
If you are not having any problems, and from that thread, some people have much larger lists, then don't worry about it - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Till now haven't faced this problem in my watchlist. But I face some other kind of things, especially around 10:30 to 12:30 at night (happening for last 3 months), when only Wikipedia seems to get real slow. Last year after I returned from my break, it used to happen all day. But after one month, everything was fine. Disabling twinkle helps reduce this problem by partly, but not wholly. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at

Thank you for putting me right over Hive.co.uk. Deipnosophista (talk) 16:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

	The Minor barnstar
	Wow, that's a lot of minor edits! Tyrone Madera (talk) 00:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that Tyrone Madera - Yes - I spend far too much time spellchecking, but once started, I find it difficult to let go ! - Arjayay (talk) 18:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thank you for your gnoming! I don't know how I keep leaving duplicate words around, but I'm terribly grateful for detail-oriented people like you who catch those things. Cheers! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks PMC "gnoming on my Inuit articles" eh? there's a phrase you don't hear very often! (Worryingly, I read it as "grooming" initially)
I'm trying to understand whether people don't have spelling/grammar checkers, have turned them off, or just ignore them - but I never get a reply when I ask - any comment?
Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Hah! Very reasonable question. I don't use a grammar checker as I've found they often highlight things that aren't wrong as incorrect and vice versa, which sort of defeats the purpose. Unfortunately, the price I pay is the occasional dropped or duplicate word :P ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn’t saw the page didn’t accept Drafts as references, now it has become clear to me. Is there any way in which my draft is considered an official Wikipedia page? Does a moderator have to approve it or something?

Hello Yoigo user from Madrid
At the top of the page, on the line above where you left your post, it clearly states "♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page ...."
Also, please sign all posts on talk pages (but NOT in articles) with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
As for your question, I have added a talkpage header, which includes a button to press when your draft is ready to be considered, but I would NOT do that at the moment, the two references , both to bus routes, need to be formatted correctly {please see Help:Referencing for beginners, and you need some references to show that Montecarmelo is "notable", i.e. deserves an article, just having 2 bus-routes does not make a place notable - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, regarding your recent edit of Simulation (computer science): the term iff is commonly used in mathematics and computer science to mean if and only if. It is not a misspelling. Changing "iff" to "if" can drastically change the meaning of a mathematical statement. Please, next time consider this before correcting. --109.81.214.106 (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

(recent changes stalker) Maybe a good idea to wikilink

iff to avoid confusion. Pelagic ( messages

 ) – (04:44 Wed 21, AEDT) 17:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

It was already wikilinked in previous text. --109.81.214.106 (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

I admit that my reference spelling in

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr73 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 

No Petr73, your additions are clearly self-promotional - you mention your name four times, link to your user-page, which we do not do, and fail to cite any sources, let alone the reliable, independent, sources that additions to Wikipedia require. - Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Well done Arjayay, I understand you. I really haven't met any important requirements in Wikipedia. My name does not have to be published four times. But I myself invented this bee feeder for liquid honey and published it in a national newspaper. I did not get a patent because this invention of mine is too simple and elementary. People make it themselves at home. Patent law is too expensive for me. I am just an ordinary beekeeper and researcher. No beekeeping company for inventory would buy my license for the production of feeders because these are cheap things and there is no profit from them. I would be happy when ordinary beekeepers respect me for making the world a better place with my inventions, even though I have no financial gain from this advertising of mine. You have a lot of experience here on Wikipedia, and you can correct my article properly so that readers can read, learn, and know that there is such a liquid honey feeder, and that I invented it myself without advertising myself. times. You can make important adjustments, correct so that there is no self-promotion. Come on, I thank you in advance if you can get at least some of my feeder back in good condition, following the rules in the encyclopedia, because thousands of beekeepers will be able to save their bees from starvation in the winter with the honey feeder if you let them read this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr73 (talk) 09:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Petr73 (talk • contribs) Petr73 (talk) 09:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC) 21:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Petr73, but no. You are clearly still trying to promote "your" feeder (you describe it as "my feeder"), and have a clear conflict of interest in so doing. Even if, as you state, you do not make money out of it, you are still trying to promote yourself as the inventor.
Furthermore, even if we remove all reference to you, as I stated above, all additions to Wikipedia should be supported by citations to reliable, independent, sources, but you have failed to provide any such sources. Sorry, but best wishes, Arjayay (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

My sources are reliable! In the National Bulgarian Library there are national beekeeping newspapers in which I am the author of many articles on beekeeping. You go and read them to see that they are reliable! There is no conflict of interest! Why do you want me to look for other people to write about me, is it necessary for every beekeeper to teach him how to become an editor like you in Wikipedia ?? Petr73 (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Here's what you're going to do now: 1. you will publish the text "Feeder for liquid honey, created by eng. Petrakov - Bulgaria" 2. you will post a picture with the feeder. I just want this so that beekeepers know how to feed their bees.

Don't be stubborn! Do what I tell you so that I don't report you to your boss! I see that you did not understand the terms in Wikipedia well and you are addicted. I will not write that you invented the feeder, because I invented it!Petr73 (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

You ask "Why do you want me to look for other people to write about me" - because that is the way Wikipedia works.
As I have twice stated above, all additions to Wikipedia should be supported by citations to reliable, independent, sources
I will certainly not be doing what you tell me to do. If you want to report me, please do so, but I suggest you read this first. Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I Suspect this three accounts to be the same person which was doing disruptive edits on kallar caste & other pages without a Wikipedia account, this accounts evolved after the page was protected, this people have been doing disruptive edits on other pages as well. Oudi berry AravindShekar9 Ihaveabandonedmychild Nandivarman (talk) 13:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, Nandivarman is User:Mamallarnarashimavarman .2409:4072:6D1F:FFC3:9616:54F3:CC5E:D55E (talk) 13:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, For your below message: If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Appasaheb Marathe, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

I had mentioned in the summary properly reference source article which i had added.

Lokmat is a Marathi language newspaper published in Maharashtra state. Founded in 1971 by Jawaharlal Darda, it is the largest read regional language newspaper in India with more than 18 million readers and the No. 1 Marathi newspaper in Maharashtra & Goa states. It is also available in E-Paper format. Readership: 20 million readers (Total readership, IRS 2017)

This is not a poorly sourced content. And you are actually threatening me here saying you will block editing. If you have a problem understanding article in Marathi language and then let us know, I will translate the source text of Lokmat into English

Manually signed for Ampromart 16:10, 1 May 2021

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your help and advice AndriiTereshchuk (talk) 18:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello fellow editor

Someone is adding dubious material to Abd el-Krim from two users Barcelona12345 and 02botGMMR. Can you protect the page and block the two users? They are doing the same thing to their page Massinissa Akandouch 197.153.20.143 (talk) 06:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello IP from Kenitra, Morocco - I can't protect the page, or block the users, as I am not an admin.
In any case, one of the IPs has had no warnings whatsoever, and the other just one warning, last month, so they would not be blocked even if I was an Admin.
Furthermore, although the page has had a few minor unsourced edits, that is nowhere near the level of disruption required to consider protecting a page.
Of course, if it was protected, you could not edit it either. - Arjayay (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

I am actually from Tangier, Morocco. Thank you for the Reply. IS there a rule for peple login to two accounts to edit wikipedia? I think that Barcelona12345 and 02botGMMR are the same person. 197.153.20.143 (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

IP tracers are not always accurate - you should consider

WP:Creating an account. As for 2 accounts, AFAIK although deprecated, it is not against the rules, unless they are used to multi-vote or disguise edit-warring. As one of them hasn't made any edits at all this month. I think you may be imagining things - Arjayay (talk

) 20:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, re:Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School Faversham, I disagree with your view. The school badge was ahead of its time when designed and still is remarkable in its design. It is a notable feature of the school's heritage such that it appears top right of the Wikipedia page. Given the time now elapsed I may genuinely be the only person left who knows its provenance. There is no reference I can quote, but if I don't record it here, this piece of knowledge may be lost forever. MarthaLuke (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry,

burden is upon whoever adds information to also provide a detailed reference, from a reliable source, to enable people to verify the information in the future.- Arjayay (talk

) 13:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

While I have clicked the "thanks" button on all of your edits, I'd like to give you personal kudos for the proofreading you've done on my articles. I've worked as a proofreader myself in the newspaper biz, and I really appreciate having an second pair of eyes. Wreck Smurfy (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

A pleasure Wreck Smurfy, it is what us WP:WikiGnomes do. I often ask, but rarely get a reply, does your browser have a spell/grammar check? if so, have you turned it off? or do you just ignore it?
{P.S. I think you'll find it's a second, not an second) - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 09:19, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes, my browser does have, although since I'm in Canada it defaults to Canadian spellings, so I have to partially ignore it. Good point about "an" second. (Duh.) I think most of what you've fixed in my work is duplicate words rather than spelling errors. Wreck Smurfy (talk) 00:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Arjayay,

Thank you for contrebuting to our article and improving it by adding the insert links. We are aware of this kind of mistakes and we are working on improving our artile!

Please have a look at the last version of our article.

Manually signed for Obretenova Tatyana 11:27, 10 May 2021‎ (UTC)

Thank you Arjayay, I very much appreciate your correction of my double "the!"

No worries

Ballinacurra Weston That is what us Wikignomes do - happy editing - Arjayay (talk

) 18:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Shri guru hargobind sahib was trained by bhai jaita ji and bhai sigar ji which was written in bhagat ratan mala book of sikhism in 17 century at a time of guru hargobind sahib ji Harmanjatt 00 (talk) 08:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

I want to talk to you My email [redacted] Please msg on this Soniyadonic (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Soniyadonic
Right where you left your post it states, <!---♦♦♦ Please put new posts at the BOTTOM of the page and include a title set between double == signs ♦♦♦---> so why did you not do that?
I have redacted your e-mail address and will not be e-mailing you, because, as also stated at the top, "discussions should be open and on the record."
Please stop deleting sourced information and references, and stop adding unsourced claims, or you will be blocked. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Im sorry, but I dont think you know what I am suffering. I am suffering rejectitis, a disease where I get rejected by Wikipedians. So please get a damn life. Thank you.

1. draftsmatter Doctorine Dark (talk) 15:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I notice that you have removed links to Rahul Gandhi from Pappu recently. You don't seem to have been involved in either Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 86#Mentioning the use of "pappu" to insult Rahul Gandhi or the talk-page discussions about this. (Gandhi is arguably the most famous person with this nickname in the world, which probably explains why people keep trying to link to him in that article.) @Masem attempted to add a sourced explanation a few months ago, but got reverted by an editor who has very strong feelings about the subject. Have you looked into this subject before? WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Arjayay, I added the name of Surendra Nath in the list under "Cricket" as he was a renowned cricketer in his time and played for India in Test cricket. Wikipedia has an article on him but unfortunately his name is not correctly indicated. It should be Surendra Nath and not Raman Surendranath. I knew him personally and I have verified his name with his son.

As to my edits I apologize as I am not familiar with all the details of editing on Wikipedia. Your help in this regard is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern1955 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Modern1955, thanks for your post.
Under Wikipedia rules, I cannot accept what you "know", and the refences in his article are all deadlinks, or in books I don't have, or behind a paywall I'm not prepared to pay.
Fortunately cricinfo verifies his name and dates here, so I have added that to the lead of his article and I have reformatted the addition at List of Modern School alumni which removes the redlink. I hope that is all OK now? Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Team,

Please remove the word 'Untouchables' Rohitkej (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Will do, apologies. JediMasterMacaroni (Talk) 00:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Dear friend Arjayay , today I stepped into my twentieth year ( my birthday) , at this moment , I want your wishes for the best of future in Wikipedia. Thanks. தனீஷ் (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello there! I just started a discussion on the talk page for the article Palestine Children's Relief Fund, about whether or not an interview with Steve Sosebee by Vaush on YouTube should be used as a source on the article in question. I invite you to share any thoughts that you may have on the matter there. Cheers! —Matthew - (talk) 17:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Too many errors. Too much reliance on nonsense/hearsay published on sites such as IrelandXO. You are invited to email [redacted] where primary evidence is vital. Researcher McGuire Descendant (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi

original research, only what has already been published in WP:Reliable sources - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk

) 09:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks for correcting the spelling of 'Referred' in the above Marc Bolan article. (I had to look it up, again, just to send this!). Heath St John (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

No worries Heath St John, it's what us WP:WikiGnomes do, but it always nice to be appreciated.
I often ask this question, but rarely get a reply, does your browser have a spelling/grammar checker? if so, have you turned it off? or do you just ignore it?
Anyway, thanks for the thanks, and happy editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I don't know! I see word suggestions appear as I write. Most of those are ones in the 'phone's memory which I've used before, though. I always try to remove incorrectly spelt ones, as I don't want them to appear as a suggestion again; as that should reinforce the impression that they were spelt correctly, and nothing should ever be learned. I also try to re-read everything, before posting, to spot any mistake; and still I miss things. I've learned thr value of proofreaders. (REFERRED !) Thanks again. Regards. Heath St John (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

...and then I see, "...thr (THE) value of proofreaders", above ! (1: THE.

2:REFERRED).

I think there are nineteen-plus 'R' 's, in 'Grrrrr', etc., arent there? How infuriating ! Thanks again. Heath St John (talk) 16:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

That depends Heath St John - I think the British spelling has nineteen, but the American has one less - as in travelled (UK) v traveled (US), and several other words - Arjayay (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Please remove SC from demographic and add OBC in place of SC. In all states of India Dhobis Rajaks belongs to OBC and only in few States they have 2 faces SC and OBC. Rohitkej (talk) 09:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

reliable sources, not blogs, or sources without a reputation for being independent and for fact checking - Thank you - Arjayay (talk

) 14:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Can you help me in getting this Article Published. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Darzubair/Muzamil_Mahmood Dar zubair 20:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

When I used to patrol RC every day, I'd set enough filters that I could scroll back a few days, and it was always surprising how many garbage edits were constantly on the verge of slipping off the bottom of the feed. It always made me nervous to think about... because if I hadn't been there to revert it, who knows? Anyway, I saw you issued a uw-vand4 for an edit someone made three days ago, so I want to let you know that you've made me more comfortable about the world. A silent guardian... a watchful protector... a dark knight. jp×g 22:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Read the history of lahore and kasur. My edits were based on facts. How is aryan invasion theory founded? its just a theory. How can someone use it as a histiry if a city kasur. GauravMaP (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

reliable source that supports those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing do do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references - please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to"
Furthermore, you keep deleting properly referenced information, and the references from reliable sources, without any explanation, let alone an acceptable one.
Finally almost all of your edits have false edit summaries e.g. deleting 2,621 bytes of information from Kasur claiming it is a "grammar error"
Please stop all these unacceptable practices, or you will be blocked. - Arjayay (talk

) 11:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Biased edits. GauravMaP (talk) 10:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

GauravMaP I see I am the fifth editor you have accused of this. please read No personal attacks and don't do it again - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hii, Arjayay you have remove my some link which I have edited, I know the links were Drafts, but there are 2-3 months passed when i created this pages, but Wikipedia didn't responded or removed the Draft. What can i do to remove draft? If you know, Reply me.
Signed for Wikiuser829 (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2021‎ (UTC)

Hi

Draft:Laxmi Ghar Aayi just has an inline external link to instagram, there is no point whatsoever in submitting them for review, because they will simply be rejected.
Please read Help:Your first article and Help:Referencing for beginners and then add references to support all the information, from WP:Reliable sources, not social media, not Wikipedia, IMDB or other user created websites and not tabloid papers or coffee table magazines.
When you have done that, come back and tell me, and I will be able to advise you further. - Arjayay (talk

) 09:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MasterChef Celebrity (Spanish TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

I see the

why am i not allowed to list jotaro on the kist kf marine biologist page Ilikejojo123 (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Ilikejojo123 - Which part of

"Jotaro Kujo is fictional and appears on List of fictional scientists and engineers but is not eligible for this list."

are you having trouble understanding ? - Arjayay (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

hello, could you please semi protect the biographical article Darshan, my apologies for doing this in a wrong way

thanks for protecting wikipedia from vandalism Ilikejojo123 (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

hello, could you please semi protect the biographical article Darshan, my apologies for doing this in a wrong way. While warning in my talk page, please elaborate the disruptive edit which I did so that I would know my mistake and rectify by learning. Did not get response when I posted the previous message, eagerly waiting for the response...

thx+rgds — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaisriramJaisriram (talk • contribs) 03:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

please elaborate the disruptive editing which I did at Darshan according to you so that I would know my mistake and rectify by learning. Did not get response when I posted the previous message, eagerly waiting for the response from you end, thanks in advance

— Preceding unsigned comment added by JaisriramJaisriram (talk • contribs) 08:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

JaisriramJaisriram thank you for your posts
Firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages (but NOT in articles) with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
Secondly, please do not start a new section when adding to your previous post.
Thirdly, please preview your posts and do not publish posts with ridiculously oversized images, as included in your last post, which I have now deleted
Fourthly, stop adding multiple posts without giving the person time to respond - you have interrupted me giving this reply several times
As for your question No, Darshan will not be semi protected, at the moment. The only person who has recently vandalized that page is you by repeatedly adding a semi-protected template to an unprotected page. This was clearly explained to you on your talk page, in one of my warnings "Repeatedly adding a protected icon to a unprotected page is, itself, vandalism" - Arjayay (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm pleased to your corrections, surely those mistakes shall not be repeated. I've gone through the articles which explain all my mistakes and my apologies for not understanding the actual part of your warning in my talk page.
could you please help me out in cropping an image file which is already uploaded ? JaisriramJaisriram (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

JaisriramJaisriram I've just had to remove your signature from in front of a section title, which stops it being a section. Please use the "show preview" button to see the effect of your edits before publishing them.
As for cropping images, sorry I have no knowledge in that area and can't immediately find the relevant guidance - try the pages in this search - Arjayay (talk) 10:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

could you please clarify the reason for changing the image upright size to 0.7 from that of default 1 at Darshan ?
I'm just asking this because as I've seen, the image of the person is not shown in the pop-up box; means, in desktop version if you just bring the cursor over the name, along with the brief info..signature image is shown whereas the same signature image is shown while searching the article in mobile version instead of the showing actual potrait of the person, so keeping this in mind I'm changing the upright size back to default, i.e, 1.
Please resolve if any mistake is done in my unknown point of view, waiting for your responce, thanks JaisriramJaisriram (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay. I came across this article while correcting citation errors. The article is currently in quite a broken state, cause by an edit by Vicctory09. As you've had some dealings on the page before I thought I would bring it to you attention, as the article is locked and I can't correct it myself. Thanks 92.5.2.97 (talk) 16:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Nevermind it's been fixed. Sorry to bother you. Thanks 92.5.2.97 (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

बहन के लोडे तेरी माँ चोद दु गा अगर दुबारा Ror नेम का article edit किया तेरी बहन की सील तोड़ दु गा ना तो तुजे उस caste के बारे में पता हैं हम Ror हैं बहन चोद तेरा से ज़ायद ही पता होगा Haryanaorg (talk) 09:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Not surprised you were indeffed - note to self - check every edit to the Ror article - Arjayay (talk) 11:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

please do take a serious action on this user Haryanaorg as the user has edited in an Offensive manner and abused in Hindi language. Better to Block indefinitely
casual doubt:- did not understand the meaning of word "indeffed" in your message above
JaisriramJaisriram (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

JaisriramJaisriram - thank you for your "advice".
He was blocked indefinitely, as you would have known if you had looked at his user page, or his talk page, or his contributions page. Indeffed is a contraction of "indefinitely blocked" - Arjayay (talk) 12:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Tarek fateh literally identifies as an indian born in Pakistan, he is not a Pakistan so lets respect him as an Indian-Canadian, heck doesn't even hold Pakistani citizenship anymore.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by KingKane2020 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

KingKane2020 - Firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages (but NOT in articles) with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
As for your comment, can't you see that your argument is self-defeating. when you say he "doesn't even hold Pakistani citizenship anymore" ? - Arjayay (talk) 07:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Some user named Sourav is recently trying to add Amartya Sen as Brahmin, He is not a Brahmin but born in a Baidya family. Please keep a note and change it. Please tell him not to do. And also do something to protect the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.110.142.135 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello IP from Kolkata, firstly, please sign all posts on talk pages (but NOT in articles) with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp.
As for your post, you need to discuss this at

Talk:Bengali Brahmins, citing Reliable sources, rather than edit warring, or ALL of you could be blocked.
That page is on my watch-list, but I am not an admin, so cannot take any direct action to protect the page, or sanction any of the editors. - Arjayay (talk

) 07:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

-

User:Dineshs01102000 is possibly paid editing for a political party. He calls J. Jayalalithaa "The icon" and all his edit promotes her. Please advice him. He repeatedly removes her cited birth name Komallavalli and even removes it from the early life section which was there for years. 157.51.93.128 (talk) 08:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Now is sock puppetting in J. Jayalalithaa 157.49.202.243 (talk) 08:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Please keep an eye on the page. He is socking with many ip ranges.157.49.210.120 (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello User:Arjayay, I have been updating the publication of Polytechnic José Antonio Echeverría, but I do not know how to request a name change. This institution was called like that before 2016, in that year it stopped being polytechnic and became officially a university, leaving the name in English Technological University of Havana "José Antonio Echeverría", so i ask if you have time and can advise me to make the change. The website of the institution is this www.cujae.edu.cu.--Frivasoto (talk) 00:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deewana Main Deewana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasir Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Arjayay,

I saw that you edited Bodybuilding page on Wikipedia. If possible, please contribute to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brian_Graham_(actor)

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeyitsmeFellen (talk • contribs) 20:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Dear Sir, Please go through actual figure and fact regarding upadhyay.The title upadhyay used for Gurukul teacher from immemorial periods of time. You may Go any Indian scriptures.the editing done with true fact.so Please help to improve this page.thanks मोहन चन्द्र उपाध्याय (talk) 10:38, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Sir, it's not right description about Upadhyaya which is mentioned on wikipedia.kindly try to understand about factual data about upadhyaya.upadhyay were Gurukul teacher belongs to Indian Gurukul system. Kindly go through Indian history. thanks मधुसूदन 81 (talk) 12:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is only interested in what has already been published in

predatory publishers.
These sources must be properly cited in order to support any information added to, or changed in our pages, so the information can be verified

as true in the future.

It is NOT up to me, any other editor, or the reader, to "go through Indian history" as you suggest, or to know about the subject, to find sources, or add references for you.
The responsibility for providing citations is solely on whoever adds or changes any information, to provide references from reliable sources that support those additions or changes.
You are repeatedly failing do do this, which is why your edits have been, and will continue to be, reverted, until you do add proper references.
Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for the "how to" guide. - Arjayay (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Its totally wrong interpretation whatever you saying.the content which you protecting is completely wrong and baseless.Sir we want to improve this topic with which have been published in reliable sources. whatever's information addition,all are given in Hindu Scriptures,Like Vedas, Puranas, Ramayana, bhagwat geeta etc.if you don't have knowledge about it then what we can do for you.its your problems.for your personal problems shouldn't conflict with improvement of any page.if you think this not reliable pls.tell us what is reliable.you just misusing your privilege Rights.to saying that neither I shall work for this topic nor I shall let allow.this personal policy is against of wikipedia.Kindly improve your knowledge and avoid such kind of stubborn behaviour.thanks मधुसूदन 81 (talk) 13:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Sir we do lot of hardworking for any topic to studying all reliable sources.kindly make it open for More discussion. Do some study about please.dont make it personal ego.thanks मधुसूदन 81 (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Why have you removed corrections I made to items on this entry earlier today?

Paul Burton - User Bertiemerri Bertiemerri (talk) 19:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bertiemerri - as stated in my edit summary at Help Yourself (band) - "Rm EL in body + Names as WP:LASTNAME + PoV" - to explain that further:-

1. You added a link to Malcolm Morley's website in the body of the article. We do not add such external links in the body of an article
2. You kept referring to people by their first name - e.g. "Malcolm" + "Sean" we don't do that as per
   WP:LASTNAME
3. You used a PoV phrase "Sadly" which, again, we do not do

I have not yet had a chance to check, so I have not corrected it yet, but I am sure Sam Apple Pie played the first Glastonbury festival - is that not true? - Arjayay (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Arjayay, Ok, so I have not understood the rules of Wikipedia. 1) Where should I put an external link to a website then? 2) I use people’s first names as they are all personally known to me. 3) again I use sadly as it is a sad fact that Sean died quite recently. As for Sam Apple Pie playing Glastonbury in 1970 that is correct, but Malcolm Morley didn’t play with them nor did Dave Charles at that time. Malcolm has never played with them, he only played harpsichord on a track of their 1969 album. Help Yourself actually played Glastonbury in 1971. I’m trying to correct incorrect information on their entry and other related entries. Hope this explains and you can tell me what I can and can’t do. Thanks. Bertiemerri Bertiemerri (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)