User talk:AskeeaeWiki

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails

WP:NSONG

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:House of Balloons (song)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asknaffffwiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Karnataka was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Only non-primary source is about the album creator.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petals to Thorns (D4vd EP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 12:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Way Things Go (Beabadoobee song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Asknaffffwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Would you like to take a look at the recent discussion for track listing template? If you have time, your comments are always appreciated. 2001:D08:2936:88FB:17AB:B51C:BC51:C36B (talk) 09:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asknaffffwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 17:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for removing stylizations, particularly on

@

talk) 06:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Chris troutman Okay, thanks for the notification. I'll look for better sources, and if anything comes, I'll make a draft for the article instead. Thanks. AskeeaeWiki (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited After Hours til Dawn Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New-wave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imperfect for You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperfect for You until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

@

Your Power Ah, I thought the article would've met notability. I'm busy, but currently I can see if I can further work with the article. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 04:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 23:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

The article I Feel It Coming you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Feel It Coming for comments about the article, and Talk:I Feel It Coming/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 17:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

@Bilorv Thank you! I'll address the issues right now. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 22:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @AskeeaeWiki.

I'm sorry for bothering you on a matter that isn't about your GA nomination for House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls (I'll be reviewing it when I can), but I'm just here to let you review some changes I made to the prose of the aforementioned article in the title of this message and its references, before nominating it to Did You Know. They are fine? Thank you for reading, you are very kind, really. Santi (talk) 19:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:DYKCNN tabs). 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 20:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The article House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls for comments about the article, and Talk:House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pollosito -- Pollosito (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on getting "I Feel It Coming" and "House of Balloons / Glass Table Girls" to good article status. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAmazingPeanuts Thank you! I remember back a few months ago I did not have any experience with Wikipedia so you had to revert my edits since they were either unsourced or poorly sourced lol. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 02:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I remember. I still see my warnings from July and October up above. It seems that you have improved in a few months. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternal Sunshine (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmopolitian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just noticed you were the editor who added "the" before artists' names on One of the Girls last week. I reverted an editor named AlNahyan for removing them and calling them "typos". The editor has been warned not to edit war by an administrator, but today, manually reverted me and removed them again, saying "it's just an essay" as if that's a reason to edit war (I have informed the admin again that they've done this). Just letting you know as you are the one who introduced them. Ss112 06:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

Anti (Rihanna album), Get Up (EP), (It Goes Like) Nanana

).

Although I understand that WP:FALSETITLE is "just an essay", I agree that it raises a good point. He pretty much has dismissed the admin's request to stop edit warring, claiming the conversation was "over" when he didn't even reply. His edit summaries on his own talk page don't help either, as he states he will "do whatever he wants" (Check his talk page). I reverted his edits on the articles you made also, since there was no evidence of a problem which he attempted to "fix" (

WP:BROKE

). I also see he waited a day to manually reverted it, to purposefully avoid being reported for an edit war.

Thank you for bringing this to my attention, cheers! 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 06:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm very aware of the amount of warnings they've received and what they said when removing the talk page messages and have let the admin know. Also, you said you reverted their edits on the articles I made. Which ones? Ss112 06:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

Anti (Rihanna album), but he manually reverted it and I really could not be bothered to revert again. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 06:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, if you have anything to say on this editor, please weigh in at User talk:Ad Orientem/Archive 26#Can you please ask this editor to stop edit warring? I tagged you there earlier. Maybe you can shed more background on the situation. Never mind, Ad Orientem closed the discussion. Thanks for your help all the same. Ss112 16:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you both have something to say, mention me next time/or go to my talk page. Getting brave behind my back, being hostile and making irrelevant points won't help your case. AlNahyan (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You repeatedly become hostile towards anyone who points out that your "fixing formatting" and "grammar" is something that was

about respecting the status quo and not attempting to restore your edit after a revert. Instead of attempting to discuss with him, like you are asking both of us, you instead stated in an edit history that you will "do whatever [you] want", and cleared his conversation with no reply. 𝘮𝘪𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘦𝘭'𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘺, 06:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I posted a respectful message on Ss112's talk page regarding the I Hear You article. I just wanted to know why he thought his preferences was a good enough edit summary. But obviously he felt no need to be respectful, instead turning to hostility, hypocrisy and honestly just being a bad person to deal with.

Also, I am aware that you haven't been hostile to me like at all. So thank you for not being a horrible person to talk to. And fixing grammar is literally what I do on the majority of articles I edit because some of them have either abysmal structuring, punctuation in the wrong place and so forth. But I am aware that sometimes I have messed up when pressing summaries quickly, so I'd like to apologise for that.

In terms of dismissing an admin's warning, that's far from what occured. The warning was removed because I had read it, and felt no need to reply. And regarding "I'll do whatever I want", I don't see it as a bad thing. Because it's the truth; if I'm not making anybody upset, I'll stay in my lane while they'll stay in theirs.

Thank you so much. AlNahyan (talk) 06:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Bold, Revert, Discuss. Remember that that is what WP:BRD means. So far I've done the bold edit. You've done the revert. But there doesn't seem to be any discussion regarding the edit taking place, anywhere.

Oh wait - there is one (about me) which I was not aware of. In the future, remember to tag me when talking about me. And when dealing with other editors, I would advise you to understand WP:BRD fully instead of weaponising it and using it as a justification for making unnecessary reversions.

And just to clear the air over "false titles", let me rephrase what I've stated to you and multiple other editors a million times before. WP:FALSETITLE is not an official Wikipedia policy, so instead of reverting my constructive edits with no proper explanation, leave them be. Because not only are you disregarding WP:BRD and disregarding WP:AFG, you're also creating drama which is frankly unnecessary on a platform like this. I hope you understand that, and in the future I'd appreciate it if we could stop colliding over petty things every ten seconds. AlNahyan (talk) 06:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Balloons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock the Boat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PSA -- PSA (talk) 02:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

The article

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Weeknd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anonymous.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]