User talk:Atfyfe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Philosophy_topics#Ayn_Rand byelf2007 (talk) 19 February 2012

Why in the world would Rumsfield create something for a female military policeman and not cover those of us in the thick of combat in the previous wars', Korea(so called conflict). Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.20.80.70 (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that combat veterans of previous wars should have been and should be recognized with a combat badge/ribbon/medal. I don't know if I agree that gender has anything to do with the matter though. - Atfyfe (talk) 04:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary here [1] is rather unfathomable. Could you explain better the reason for your revert? I was swapping the links so that you can't get to philosophy, by creating a loop. Why was it a problem? Rcsprinter (natter) @ 11:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for

If you wish to start a new article on the theory of art please note the correct title would be Theory of art. There is no article there at the moment. Tassedethe (talk)

It's a pity you decided to ignore my comment. Per

WP:RM. Tassedethe (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

I did not see your second comment, but I agree that Theory of art seems like the correct location for the entry. -Atfyfe (talk) 02:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atfyfe. I noticed you created the original JPG images of the ribbons with hourglass devices (bronze, silver, gold) for the AFRM article, which can be seen here. If you have the opportunity and you're interested in spending the time doing it, would you mind making an image for the 40 year award? To complete the set, we'd need one showing a gold and bronze hourglass mounted on the ribbon next to each other, with gold on the left and bronze on the right. Any interest? Thanks, AzureCitizen (talk) 12:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message at CsDix's talk page.

I am getting the impression you did not quite understand me about the edit on the pragmatism article. When I wrote that the first sentence's purpose was to "open" the article I was referring to how the lead seaction is supposed to give a short overview of the topic, establishing what the article and topic is about (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section). As I've stated, the sentence you removed attempted to do exactly this, even if it executed the job poorly.

You appear to be knowledgeable of what pragmatism is, given how you seemingly know what it is not. As such - given that you're the one that deemed the previous definition to be nonsense and removed it - I'll ask of you to try create a new, better one. The lead section already states that pragmatism is a branch of philosophy and some characteristics of it, but beyond that, it does not state what pragmatism means. Please give it a try, for the sake of Wikipedia. Sky380 (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly it is not a "Terrible' entry, it fairly accurately follows the entry in the Oxford Companion to Philosophy. The essence of the problem is very simple. The ramifications of it extend over multiple articles and do not need to be partially included here. Secondly material like 'See the article on ... and make up your own mind' is unencyclopedic language. T----

The article on pluralism has a TERRIBLE lacking on any discussion on modes of being. Which is exactly the lacking that Brews is responding to. I don't like a good amount of his additions, but I have a much bigger problem with the utter failure in this entry that he is trying to correct. It is good to know about problem with him on other articles, but he is entirely correct about the neglectful failures on this entry. I cannot devote much time to this debate, but if you want my support then you need to be more open to someone (i.e. Brews) who is trying to fix a problem with this entry. The entry should CLEARLY deal with ontological category differences/debates between things like numbers/fictional objects/atoms/space/time/etc. and the fact that the entry doesn't is why I call the entry 'Terrible' (which it is). - Atfyfe (talk) 06:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on that section, the problem is he starts well, but that adds in large amount of material without thinking. I started off with Brews with a very similar attitude to you. However what then happened is that he will not compromise on anything - witness the multiple RfCs and forum shopping on policy. Given you are happy to be involved in this I am making a series of small changes, each of which is explained in the edit summary. I suspect the response will be to reinstate all of his material (included the extended quotations) but I could be wrong ----Snowded ^TALK 08:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should also note one other experienced editor (on philosophy pages) is also involved, see here ----Snowded ^TALK 08:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:3acrmotto.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:BranchCords.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Branchlogo.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:CavalrySpurs.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Combatcavalrybadge.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Combatcavhat.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Combatarmorbadge.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Combatartillerybadge.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Combatengineerbadge.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just deleted a whole slew of these as G-3. Well, 3 of them. If this is some arcane non vandalistic redirect thing, as I now suspect, please let me know and I'll restore them. Dlohcierekim 08:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US infantry sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have participated in past discussions on the use of ordinals in U.S. military articles, you may be interested in the move request I started at

I see your point. Thanks for the explanation. - Atfyfe (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Atfyfe. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I just wanted to let you know that I declined to delete that article because I think it has potential. For the moment, I've redirected it to 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) as it had no references at all. Maybe I can work with you to find some references and work the article up -- or maybe merge it into the Military Horseman Identification Badge article you just created? Either way, happy to help a pitiful Army dog such as yourself. ;) Semper fi, A Train^talk 12:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atfyfe. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atfyfe. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atfyfe. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:WWICombatTankerBadge.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Army Excellence in Competition Pistol.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Branchlogo.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Tanklogo.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Tankandbranch.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:PSYOPpics 2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Army Excellence in Competition Rifleman.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

Template:Cavalry has been nominated for merging with Template:Military unit sidebar. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 12:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US Army badges has been nominated for merging with Template:US Army tabs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US Army tabs has been nominated for merging with Template:US Army badges. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:101st Air Assault.jpg

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:LRRP.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

Thanks for creating the image, I have now deployed it in the article: Recondo#Insignia. William Harris (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

PVT Murphy's Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PVT Murphy's Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Concern regarding Draft:Fight the scenario

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 10:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]