User talk:Azrl26

Hello, Azrl26! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 18:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :D Azrl26 (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Published by MDPI which is not a reliable source. And I can't see that Walter Schumm can be an expert on something so far out of his field, in which he seems to be fringe. Doug Weller talk 10:38, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So this is about the Publisher and the Author? Well nevermind him then, I will just stick to citing David King then. Would you help me with the article? The Article as it is edited by Grayfell is factically incorrect but he won't let me change it. Apparently he didn't read the sources but just removes any argument in favour of Gibson since it would be promoting fringe Theories, even if it comes from King. This is hardly neutral... Azrl26 (talk) 20:02, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dan Gibson (author). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 19:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grayfell I see my last 2 edits have already been reverted.

You are edit warring all changes in the first senctence.

You refuse to find a consensus on the talk page.

You accuse me of pro-Fringe editing on a biographic page about the author of said fringe theory, which according to

WP:FRINGE is a place where this fringe theory can be given space. It does not disturb the mainstream view in Qibla

.

You accuse me of misrepresenting sources even though I use quotes to show the point.

I refuse the accusation of "changeging the content back" since I try to respect the criticism and have changed formulation and content which apparently you didn't even read and blindly reverted.

I will seek out dispute resolution by an outside party. Thank you for posting the links to those pages. Azrl26 (talk) 19:23, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]