User talk:BAH

Thanks for uploading

indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

---

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in

]

Yes, I am learning about the Wikipedia ins and outs, policies and markup language as best and quick as time allows me! I have content and am adding it. I did not add the link to my website for any other reason that I think the authority on the subject of Violin my work has gained since first publication on paper in 1997, then online in 2000 warrants inclusion. Can we discuss this please? Thank you BAH 12:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BAH, I have responded to your most recent message by email. I would like to let you know, however, that the way to get messages across to the people is not through the edit summaries of empty edits; that's what talk pages are for. —Mets501 (talk) 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still think that your site doesn't merit inclusion in this article, as it really adds nothing that I can see to what the article already says. Besides, it is more about electric violins than anything else.

For that reason, I'd consider putting it in the electric violin article instead if I were you. +ILike2BeAnonymous 19:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Good idea. I agree. —Mets501 (talk) 08:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message to me, let me put it this way: you seem way too anxious to see your own site in lights here. Regardless of the value of your site, it looks and smells very much like self-promotion. If I were you, I'd wait until someone else puts your link in these articles. Otherwise, people are right to be suspicious; this site (Wikipedia) is full of crap that people put in merely to promote themselves. +ILike2BeAnonymous 17:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Bio-detail:

• Born
  14 February 1971
• Violin studies with Rosemary Rapaport, 1982-2001
• Musical tuition with Sir Thomas Armstrong, 1982-1994
• Graduate of the Royal Northern College of Music, 1989-1993
• Post-graduate of the Manchester Metropolitan University, 1997-1998
• electric violinist, 1984
  -

File:F58 wiki.jpg

Hi! Could you justify what the model is it (or who is manufacurer and year of production)? --A1 (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it's the production prototype 1958 fender electric violin. Historically, this is the very first violin officially granted the Patent title "electric violin". The photo shows the actual instrument that was granted a patent in 1961... BAH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.233.116 (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]