User talk:Frosty0814snowman

Hello, Frosty0814snowman, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hi Frosty - thanks for your notice to me, I've considered what you said. Could we please discuss this further? Thanks BAH 15:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of blanking comments from your talk page, it is preferred that you

Dear Frosty0814snowman,

Thank you for applying for

Oh, I thought this edit was yours. Sorry. Frosty 02:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No problem -- we all make mistakes. I appreciate the way you handled this. Interestingstuffadder 03:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't place cross namespace redirects on to Wikipedia.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  13:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revert to the Neopets article. Although perhaps badly written, lacking references, and not 100% accurate... the information you reverted is widely believed to be true. I wouldn't personally say that it was vandalism, just a bad edit. Also, User:64.59.144.21 is a mass-shared IP, and hasn't had a warning in the last 20 days. I would suggest that test4 was inappropriate. Anyway, just my thoughts. Jibbles | Talk 00:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you removed an external link from Violin calling it "possible linkspam." The wire-frame animations are worth several thousand words, showing how the parts of a violin vibrate at various frequencies. The Schleske page first came to my notice as a result of the postings of Chicago violinmaker Michael Darnton on Maestronet. If Mr. Darnton respects the work of Herr Schleske, then so do I. If you want to know why I respect the work, the writing, the photography, and the good intentions of Mr. Darnton, then go read his postings there and elsewhere, or visit his site, where you will find an excellent photo essay on the making of a viola.

I am all for reducing the bulk of the Violin article, so I don't intend to put that link back, but I have added it to Violin construction and mechanics, where it has a better chance of reaching an interested audience.

be well! Just plain Bill 01:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you are entirely correct and I apologize. I do not know how to edit the history there, and of course it should be corrected. Any suggestions? Risker 23:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you can't edit your edit summary once it is in the history page. -- FrostytheSnowman ^'sup? 00:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind that I've speedy-deleted this page and removed your MFD listing -- the page really had no redeeming value at all. I'll undo it and let the MFD run if you prefer, but I don't think it would give a terribly surprising outcome. — Dan | talk 06:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't really mind. -- FrostytheSnowman ^'sup? 11:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest vote at

My apologies for the impersonal nature of this message, but since you participated in the recent Sockpuppets of Outoftuneviolin discussion, I thought you might like to know that the categories are now at Deletion Review. This is not a solicitation of a specific response, as all participating users were notified, but your input would be appreciated. Thanks! - EurekaLott 00:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging something with a speedy after you yourself placed a CfD notice on it (and the cfd wasn't going your way) was perhaps not the best approach. It caused an erroneous pair of deletions, and a very big waste of time on DrV. I'd ask you to consider not speedy tagging things while the are subject to deletion discussion. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 13:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Frosty0814snowman! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

If I am not mistaken, as I do not use wikepidia's talk often, you have sent us a message about vandalism. If you have not, please disregard this message, or forward this to the apporpriat person. We are a school, in Byron (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron,_Illinois), so if you feel it nessassary, please block us from editing, because the vandalism will no stop, unless our school implments punishments for this.

Thankyou for pointing this out, and I will bring this to the attention of our technology teachers, Jeff Davies.

PS. Please do all futher contacting of us via email, our schools website is http://www.leeogle.org/byron/byron.htm, or you can contact me at [email protected]

Frosty,

I added the links to violin and viola samples because they are free and offer readers a chance to hear these instruments in an anechoic (echo-free) setting. I don't see how this counts as spam.

What did you have in mind with the tag on NOCl?--Smokefoot 20:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't a clue what your on about with regard to the link I left from Liszt. This link does not take individuals to a site for which I have any connection with at all. Indeed it is based in America whereas I am based in Canterbury, England. I was merely highlighting to individuals that there is a FREE SITE on the internet for downloading sheet music. There are no payments made for downloading this material as it is available quite legally to all (as these sheet music editions date back to the late 19th and early 20th century and are therefore well out of copyright). What on earth is your objection? The whole purpose of the internet is to allow the free flow of information in order to enlighten all our lives. The only kind of individual who would complain about out of copyright sheet music appearing on the internet would be someone who sells such material to individuals in conventional music stores. Is this where you are coming from???

Hi Frosty0814snowman,

I notice that you have edited Accelerated Christian Education or Talk:Accelerated Christian Education. You may be aware that this article was tagged for clean up in September. I have started a rewrite of this article at Accelerated Christian Education/draft. Please take this opportunity to make improvements to this artlce.

Also note that material about the administration of the ACE curriculum in schools should be included in a new article at

Blarneytherinosaur talk 02:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current