User talk:BKeira930

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, BKeira930. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ïvana. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dynamite (BTS song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ïvana (talk) 03:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Fox (What Does the Fox Say?). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Toxic (song), you may be blocked from editing. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Breakeven (song), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Rude (song), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I'm having trouble working out why you would want to omit information about the published music. You have been warned before. Please stop. Doctorhawkes (talk) 04:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Teenage Dream (Katy Perry song), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rude (song). Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shake It Off. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I redirected

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Beautiful (Christina Aguilera song). Binksternet (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Riptide (Vance Joy song). Binksternet (talk) 03:53, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits like this one, stop saying that a song was "written in" or "composed in" a certain key when you are citing a sheet music reference. The only thing that sheet music tells us is the key that the sheet music itself is published in. It doesn't say anything about the process of composing the song, and it doesn't say anything about the recorded version of the song. There are definitely times when the sheet music for a song is dumbed down to make it easier to perform, for instance by reducing the number of sharps or flats. Binksternet (talk) 03:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Please stop adding Musicnotes and similar music sheets to song articles, as you did to
  Easy on Me (song). There is consensus that these are not reputed sources for describing a song's key, tempo, or chord progressions, and this has also been discussed at recent featured article candidacies.--NØ 05:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Sorry. BKeira930 (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It’s my fault. BKeira930 (talk) 20:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Got to Be Real. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Magnets (song). "The song is actually a semitone higher in the key of B-flat minor" Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop abusing warning templates as you did at