User talk:Basket of Puppies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.


You have been
WP:SCRUTINY. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WilliamH (talk) 04:12, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
Note that this is a CheckUser block, and any unblock requests should be dealt with only by a CheckUser. WilliamH (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I have removed talkpage access. This user is blocked and should not be using their talkpage to request proxy edits to articles.Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

You have been
the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration
    is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and
    sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcus Hardie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Hardie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Hardie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bobherry Talk Edits 03:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

MfD nomination of
Wikipedia:Editorials

Wikipedia:Editorials during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

MfD nomination of
Template:User campus ambassador

Template:User campus ambassador during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination for merging of
Template:User Good Article Significant

Template:User Good Article Significant has been nominated for merging with Template:User Good Article. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Hamman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hamman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]