User talk:BeeCeePhoto

Hello, BeeCeePhoto, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ThaddeusB (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Getting mentored How to: Create your first article Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Featured content Miscellaneous Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation User scripts

Hi there! BeeCeePhoto, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, talk) 17:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi. Here's are links to other articles you might want to use:

• History Magazine article
• The Corps Network
• FDR Library brief article on Hilda Worthington Smith

Good job on your first article. Happy editing. Onel5969 (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoop whoop gonna party in the old hostel tonite!!! Thanks for the links, have to go thru the images and adjust the placement.... ThanksRobco311 03:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She-She-She Camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FERA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Your article She-She-She Camps is wonderful! You've done such a great job. I hope you plan on continuing to write such interesting articles for Wikipedia. I certainly appreciate your work   Bfpage |leave a message  11:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black Fraternal association, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 05:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anita Florence Hemmings, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seven sisters and American Heritage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I was a new editor like you, I was alarmed by some of the messages that kept appearing on my talk page that let me know about all the mistakes that I had made. I got a little discouraged over this and didn't know or interact with any other editors. I begin to edit on Wikipedia in 2007, but didn't even get one message of any kind from another editor or bot until late 2013! At that time, I even doubted the existence of other editors since I had never heard from any of them. THEN the very first message I got from anyone was from an administrator that said she was going to BAN me from editing because I had written some spam! How about that for a first message?

Anyway, the purpose of this message is to let you know that you can delete anything from your talk page that you want. I've deleted some things, things that other editors wrote that weren't very nice. So this message is to encourage you in your writing. Your work has been quite amazing for being so new. You learn SO quickly and with so many interesting facts and info. Isn't that photo on Henning amazing? I was so lucky to find it - and it was copyright free. I'll do some more editing to help you out, but you are learning so fast that you are not going to need me for very much longer. I am enjoying helping. The Very Best Regards,

  Bfpage |leave a message  18:36, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I wanted to use that pic from the first, but couldn't figure out if it was publix. Thanks, your help has been invaluable, I left a note in talk at hemmings....Robco311 19:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello! BeeCeePhoto, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on SMOKESTACK HARDY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (talk) 21:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm confused too. The version I deleted contained no information, just a question from you. And there is no such page as User:BeeCeePhoto/SMOKESTACK HARDY. The log suggests that User:RHaworth restored the deleted revisions, but I don't see them. Deb (talk) 11:33, 14 May 2015 (UTC) ‎[reply]

Can't see anything at the link you sent me. Deb (talk) 11:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you still have access to the original text, I would suggest you copy it into your sandbox. Deb (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I found it! The draft is currently located at

User:BeeCeePhoto/Smokestack Hardy where it should be improved before submitting it for review at AFC. It is currently not in an acceptable state. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, any thoughts as to whats lacking, or the direction thats missing? I'm no expert, so speculation about the nature of Hardys peculiar obsession with fires, and the compulsion he had with keeping records with a germanic mindset to details points to him suffering a form of Asperger syndrome, which it would be interesting to explore, but he was normal in most respects.

I have encountered others who have the same complusion, in the 70's I hung out with a crew of Ham Radio Operators, who went about their lives normally, but had no other real interests (other than bowling league) who entered a world of postcards in their radio rooms. Some had 3000 or more collected, from around the world, that was a response sent them from a midnight contact, however brief, on the radio. Every night they entered that world, and attempted to make contact thru a ionosphere bounced signal propagated around the globe to set up a postcard mailing. Thousands of hours, night after night, mountains of days tweaking their rigs and antennas, all in pursuit of another postcard. Kind of like wikipedia editors, if you catch my drift. Robco311 11:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeCeePhoto (talk • contribs)

I'd have to agree with Dodger - lots of work needed. I'd recommend you spend some time looking at other articles and noting how they differ. There's little evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 13:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your other draft Draft:Vulcan blazers is becomming fairly good - after a bit of a false start - so follow your own example. She-She-She Camps, which you created earlier, is also a quite decent example. It seems like you do actually know what an article is supposed to look like. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I am very disappointed to see phrases such as "how to find it" or "I don't see them". If you follow the red link to the original page do you not see the words "moved page"? Surely you automatically follow the link to the stated destination of the move? Also Deb and BeeCeePhoto, are you aware of a useful report called contribs history which shows where the text has landed up?

I have to admit that I and probably Zackmann08 (talk · contribs) saw the shouted title and automatically assumed vandalism. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• BeeCeePhoto, I assume you are using a custom signature in your preferences that signs you as Robco311. By all means call yourself by a different name but will you please set up a signature that provides a link to your user page, your talk page or your contributions history, preferably all three so that the SignBot does not keep following you around. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:17, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa buddy!! Thats no mah dog!~ I only have a sausage in my pocket and I don' knoa why he's in the bar....

Still learning the lingo, but sometimes an editor moves something and by the time I've figured out where it ended up I've already zoned out on the search~~

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Smokestack Hardy. Thanks! Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The words Buff, Photographer, Black, Fire and Historian should not have capital letters. You have linked "professional fire Buff" with a term that doesn't exist in wikipedia (hence the red text) and, even if it did exist, it does not mean anything like "professional fire Buff". Presumably "Smokestack" is a nickname, not a real name, so it should be inside quotation marks. And you should provide a citation for him being the first African-American firefighter in Baltimore. Deb (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, noted. The Professional fire buff is a pejorative, an inside joke among police and firemen. They buy 2-way radios, know the slang used on the job, and get there to a 'job' before the uniforms do. I will adjust it to 'fire buff', as this guy was the most famous of them all. I don't want to explain all the details, like 'buff' from the stand-arounds at a fire in the 1890's snug and warm in their buffalo coats watching but not helping, and getting water thrown on them... 'black fire historian' because he chased that info down relentlessly, so there is room for improvement in the phrasing that I won't see until tomorrow. It helps to have someone point this out now, while it's still in draft... Thanks Robco311 18:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vulcan blazers. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please take care when adding content to the Vulcan Blazers draft that you do not simply copy text directly from the sources - you must restate the information in your own words. Directly copying is not permitted (it is in fact illegal, not merely a Wikipedia rule). And before you ask, no it does not make a difference if it's from the subject's own website or even if you personally are the author of the original source text - it is still copyright of the website owner.

A paragraph has been copied from this source and another from this one (there is also a correctly done direct quote from that source). You may make limited use of direct quotes if the particular wording in the source is important enough to preserve. Such quotes must however be clearly marked as quotes by punctuation and the source must be referenced directly after the closing quotation mark. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the legal jargon that I'm having issue with. Perhaps I can find a way to reword, but I originally referenced it along with all the other legal stuff. Robco311 (talk) 13:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did such an amazing job on She-she-she camps I want to make sure you don't lose your momentum! Did you need any other support that you think I can provide with any new content? The president of your fan club,

  Bfpage |leave a message  19:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's really nice of you to stop by and offer encouragement. A barnstar for you! I am stuck between 3 editors who want me to clean up my drafts on 2 articles. Draft:Arthur "Smokestack" Hardy and Draft:Vulcan blazers are in progress but the editors are looking to remove some material that I feel essential to the subject. They are in AFC so I you have any insi8ght as to the overall Balto situation, let me know what needs improvement so I can fix it soonest..... Thanks again for the encouragement Robco311 (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have just patrolled (and worked on) the article you created. The topic is very interesting. I would just like to invite you to read

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation

if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ramnath88 (talk) 07:54, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BeeCeePhoto, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have a long rant on Institutional racism regarding aboriginal issues.You have also said the following:

The collective failure of an organization to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. Thats what defines Institutional Racism. I wrote of the failure of the church to provide services in canada to the ethnic children rendered into its care, not about the residential schools. You removed that and replaced it with plagarized material explaining the residential schools. The fact that the church ran the schools needed that backdrop to show the continued, ingrained racism, not of the individuals, but of the system that allowed social workers(gov't) to remove babies from mothers, children from their families, and deliver them to a chop shop (residential schools) where TB infected kids were bedded with healthy kids whom had no immunities, abused and neglected, and left dying at a higher rate than if they had been left alone in their pagan villages. The worst of the abuse was doled out to the ones who were not christians (by Clerics and staff). Stop trying, you cannot change the past. If you want to write about the schools, be my guest. I'm writing about institutional racism - the two are not the same Robco311 (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This -[1] details the lenghts to which others have gone to remove and whitewash the extent of the crimes perpetrated against the First Nations. 2 paragraphs is not enough to go into all the attempts to cover up a 'final solution', a termed coined at the highest level of government 35 years prior to the NAZI's using it for their own pogroms against their victims. There is no need to link it to the main article, the citations in it validate every sentence made. Stories of buried priests babies being dug up and moved when the schools closed should horrify everyone, you choose to remove that truth to serve your agenda. The section is not about the Aboriginal Truth and Reconciliation Commission, it is about institutional racism. Let it stand for others to hack at, you should stand away. Robco311 (talk) 08:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

I have told you to put this on other well-moderated sites like the Canadian Indian residential school system or other well-moderated Wikipedia pages, and you refuse to do so. WHY? Beyond the fact that I advised that feedback from other editors help support your statements, and beyond the fact that they would probably recommend better choice of words, and beyond the fact that it would prevent an edit war, why are you resistant in doing this? It seems that if you want people to know about the residential school system, then you should tell them. You rant about not whitewashing the issue and removing the truth, and people not talking about what happened in the residential school system, but when I encourage you to tell people about it (through editing Wikipedia pages), you do nothing. You are being hypocritical. You rant that people shouldn't be silent on the residential school experience, but then you are silent on the experience.DivaNtrainin (talk) 22:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your timetable for me advancing your agenda is not up for discussion. I am not editing the residential scchools, which you seen intent on whitewashing, I am discussing why systematic racism occurs in institutions, and you want to clear the churches of involvement. They were involved, and you are vandalizing pages to neutralize their involvement, adding sentences to make it seem as if what happened was bad, but we don't do that anymore.(But only in the Canada section...) Your attempts to show that I should be editing an unrelated topic (residential schools) rather than showing truths about Institutional racism perpetrated by the gov't and the churches to further a racist agenda against an ethnic population smacks of... need I say it? (Institutional racism.) Making it seem that I'm refusing to edit the article on residential schools is a load of horsepucky. A nun throwing a child from the window of a three story building is an atrocity. You whitewashing articles that point out that this may have occurred is an atrocity. Your removal of sources detailing this occurred is an abomination. Your whitewashing the facts surrounding the violence perpetrated against native women, (a vagina brought to court to show what, the hole in it or that that person's life does not matter becuz' she was just an Injun...) Every article you deleted sentences and paragraphs from to try to change the facts to controversy are an affront to the tenets of good journalism, and deleting sources should be enough to get you banned permanently. this coming from a very bad writer... Robco311 (talk) 20:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've made attempts to resolve this, the other editor, DivaNtrainin (talk) has a prior history reverting edits to engage in an edit war regarding Canada issues.... Robco311 (talk) 20:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Institutional racism. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Every sentence was sourced, they were wholesale removed by your partner. Robco311 (talk) 23:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to read Wikipedia:Citing sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on transferring the cites, more than 40sec is required Robco311 (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the cites with the text and tags like <big> don't go in articles. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to use your sandbox to prepare the content. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove

You seem to have a problem with material sourced and cited from other wikipedia pages. None of the material cited is from an un-sourced POV, they have already been vetted. Post no more unless you can find errors of fact not sourced. to you too... Robco311 (talk) 01:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated on the talk page, much of the material is problematic and written horribly non-neutrally. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soon achieved, with no help on your part, thanks. Robco311 (talk) 01:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have agreed to mediate your dispute here: [2] Montanabw^(talk) 23:02, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page.

  Bfpage |leave a message  01:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am someone who is aware of the situation....sources easy to find. See here. As for copy and pasting just need to add an attribution See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. On a side note there is a tool for google books to help make the refs normal see this link. -- Moxy (talk) 13:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hope we're talking about the same thing, The article that was noted after 2min and deleted by NeilN was the Australia section of Institutional racism. I had just transferred it from the sandbox and started adding the cites when he did that.

The portion with the copy and paste unsourced text that removed my 2 paragraphs is the Aboriginal

Those were three great suggestions you just made, Thanks, I will try to make better use of them in the future. About the Canada reverts, I made sure to ref everything I put in my two paragraph with citations, but claiming that I was soapboxing the other editor replaced my text with the residential schools, which was not on topic. Yet it has been allowed to remain. Without sourcing. Or references. Or any explanation on how it refers to Institutional racism. Why is this not reverted by other editors? I defer to your greater experience at this than this bad writer.... Robco311 (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 14:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Institutional racism page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Institutional racism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Colonial, Colonials and Ottoman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vulcan blazers, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Institutional racism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonials. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! BeeCeePhoto, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Homer B. Roberts, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.collisionworksokc.com/2016/01/02/black-history-month-pioneering-african-american-in-the-automotive-industry-homer-b-roberts/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Institutional racism, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have a problem with you copy and pasting text to create articles. This would be a violation of our basic policies. Best to read over Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. I will be making a report so we can review some articles you have been involved in. -- Moxy (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Moxy (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:11, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have to contest the speedy deletion of this as it is not my edits here that MOXY has flagged.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institutional_racism&diff=667768002&oldid=667765600
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Institutional_racism&diff=668233036&oldid=668229326

Neither of which were my edits, they were the results of an edit war by this editor, I rewrote the passage that she objected to and you are now accusing me of her copy violation.

See here

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Institutional_racism#Inclusion_of_Canadian_Aboriginal_Residential_School_System_and_Truth_and_Reconcilliation_Commission

Robco311 (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC) As for Speedy deletion nomination of Philip James Rutledge, I see that User:JJMC89 has asked for some speedy deletions ..e.g Philip James Rutledge - Richard D. Gidron - Vaughn Harper.....still need to review more. -- Moxy — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeeCeePhoto (talk • contribs) 19:41, 2016 March 4 (UTC)

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hendrick van der Heul and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Hendrick van der Heul, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hendrick van der Heul. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Hendrick van der Heul
  with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Hendrick van der Heul saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Homer B. Roberts and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Homer B. Roberts, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Homer B. Roberts. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Homer B. Roberts
  with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Homer B. Roberts saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Vaughn Harper and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Vaughn Harper, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Vaughn Harper. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Vaughn Harper
  with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Vaughn Harper saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Talk:Edward Davis (automotive pioneer) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Edward Davis (automotive pioneer), in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  Talk:Edward Davis (automotive pioneer). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Talk:Edward Davis (automotive pioneer)
  with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines

.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at

Talk:Edward Davis (automotive pioneer)

saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BeeCeePhoto. The copyvio detector shows your temporary page Talk:Edward Davis (automotive pioneer)/Temp is an 89.5 per cent match for the webpage http://www.detroittransithistory.info/AroundDetroit/EdDavis.html. This is only marginally better than the original page. Sorry, but I am deleting it. I see you have received warnings about adding copyright content to the website as far back as May 2015, so this is your final warning. Please don't do any more editing until you have read and understood our copyright policy. Any further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BeeCeePhoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As on the issues brought forward today, no administrator or anyone one else has noted on my talk page or in any message that I should stop trying to correct the sentences flagged as copyvio by re-writing or editing the text. For this reason I would think that anyone imposing a block would by at least thru courtesy, do so. If @ Diannaa (talk

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you need to convince us that you understand the copyright policy and undertake not to breach it in the future. You have not done so, and I am having trouble even parsing what you wrote below. BethNaught (talk) 09:48, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BeeCeePhoto, I posted a final warning to stop adding copyright violations earlier today; it's immediately above the block notice. Posting copies of articles that you know violate copyright onto talk pages is not okay. You would know this if you had read and understood our

copyright policy, a Wikipedia policy with legal considerations. You can't add copyright content anywhere on this wiki; not in articles, but also not in talk pages, sandboxes, or anywhere else. — Diannaa (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, that did not show up earlier, I was attempting to correct the copyvio. I'm still working with limited resources and can only check what I'm alerted to. It is not my intention to vandalise, I also work hard at not doing copy vio, all the info I use is referenced below the article. As I go over these I'm finding the vio to be on a page that didn't show up in my google searches while reading on the topics. It seems that after I remove the lines noted it's for something else. I also was unaware that 2-3 words constitute a copyvio, how are you to put facts or dates in if that is the case? I also see the quotes highlighted, even tho they are given attribution and sourced. Help me out here, to make this all work the pages where you talk dont always show what later appears, so your comms are in the dark. The corrections I did so far today I hi-lighted on the talk page to get assistance, not as a means to aggravate you or anyone else, I wanted to correct the piece, not vandalize... I took out the sentences by comparing to the website url, but you deleted it without letting me know if it was something else.... Robco311 (talk) 00:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All I can do here is repeat myself: You can't paste copyvio content onto talk page to work on it. — Diannaa (talk) 00:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, BeeCeePhoto. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]