User talk:Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Happy editing! Cheers,

talk) 14:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Aw, spoilsport

I liked the idea of Peter Rabbit eating his name. .

Of course now

talk) 14:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks!
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you have an interest in coinage rather than grammar, you may like to check out
talk) 15:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it implies shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My username relates to my interests:
"Big Blue" - Aircraft, the RAF
Crayfish - small freshwater lobsters, of which the Blue ones are most prized
Kray Twins - British gangsters. And I was born a twin, in the UK
There is also a pun in there relating to computing -IBM (known as Big Blue) and Cray
But if I have to change it, so be it
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bird taxonomy

Hi, I've noticed that you have been changing the genus of birds in Wikipedia articles such as the blue crane, the demoiselle crane and the bluethroat.

English Wikipedia uses the taxonomy and the common names of the IOC World Bird List as explained here.

There are other world checklists including BLI/IUCN, Clements, and Howard & Moore 4. A project has been established to create a single taxonomy for world birds by the "Working Group Avian Checklists" – you can read about it here. It uses the IOC list as a starting point. - Aa77zz (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not realise. I did check the Talk pages, but did not see anything regarding
wp:BeBold Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Wikipedia has used the taxonomy of the IOC for a long time. In 2017 this was confirmed by a vote of the bird editors who were active at that time - see the archive here. By following a single authority we can keep article consistent - species, genera, families etc. The BirdLife International (BLI) taxonomy used by the IUCN (see here) lags the IOC and Clements - probably because BLI lack the resources to keep up to date with all the changes. For example the classification of the hummingbirds was reorganised based on a big study published 2014 (see the tribe Trochilini - 11 genera resurrected etc) - but BLI haven't yet implemented these changes. - Aa77zz (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverts

Howdy. If you are changing a redirect into a full article, you don’t need to hit revert. You can just edit. Reverting implies something is wrong and you want to return to an older version of the article. awkwafaba (📥) 16:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move reverted

Your move of

WP:TWODABS disambiguation page at that title without discussion. The correct way to do this is to file a move request through the procedures outlines at Wikipedia:Requested moves. BD2412 T 20:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:BLAR

Blank-and-redirect explicitly disallows copy/paste pagemoves. Please keep this in mind going forward. Primefac (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? The advice page you sent me does not say that!
I had no choice to do what I did as I could not move the page as the alternative name already existed in the articlespace
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 22:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi. Saw your edit here. I reverted and redid it as I think it's better to use an {{Automatic taxobox}} with manual parameters. Please take a look just to make sure you're happy. I also put the taxonbar back. Thanks. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, OK. Thanks.
That looks a lot better!
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 13:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, I noted your edits to Triplophysa and thank you for editing articles on fishes. Please note that in a list of taxa you should only name each taxonomic authority once, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

"Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks, I knew that.
What you don't seem to know is that I could not Move the page as the target already existed (as a Redirect page)
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@
WP:RM/TR, there are page movers such as myself that can fulfill those requests without messing up the version history. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Phreatobite

A tag has been placed on

section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://speleogenesis.com/resources/glossary/glossary-by-letter-p/details/11/1762.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing
.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 15:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page White-eyed river martin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk) 11:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hastata, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages A. hastata, C. hastata and D. hastata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonbar placement

Taxonbars should not be placed above an External links section, as you had done at mayhaw, nor above a navbox as you had at Pildra. Taxonbars go at the end of the page. The only things that should come after them are {{Authority control}} (if present), categories and stub-sorting templates (if present). Plantdrew (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Plantdrew Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 17:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
You spoke my mind. I was thinking of requesting that you create an article on Petitella, but you have already done it. Thanks for your work on the Petitella article. Maliner (talk) 15:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many, many Thanks for the Barnstar!! You made my Christmas
I think I have finished editing for now. It's sure a good start
Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuptial tubercles has been accepted

Nuptial tubercles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBritinator (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins. Thank you for your work on

page curation process
, had the following comments:

Hi, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins Nice work!. Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 18:40, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcotos:Thank you very much!! It's always nice to get praised for helping to fix Wikipedia! Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guigarra has been accepted

Guigarra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Please note that user sandbox pages, such as your

disruptive if it continues, so please do not readd your sandbox page to categories again. Bearcat (talk) 13:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks. And Thanks for deleting stuff from MY Sandbox. I'm sorry you had to do it three times, yet only warned me now. This crackdown probably explains why I have seen articles produced from Drafts with lots of <-- remarks all over them.
As you seem to be a Very Important Wikipedian, perhaps you can convince the higher-ups to simply filter Users Sandboxes out of Categories instead? So that we juniors can actually experiment with a FULL page preview in our private, testing areas ?? I'm sure that is not beyond the realms of standard coding? Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]