User talk:Bobbytheonlyone

Hi Bebbytheonlyone! Please try to use edit summaries in your edits so that other Wikipedians can better understand the nature of your edits and/or the reasoning behind them. Cheers and good luck! -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 12:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove material without good reason and without leaving an edit summary.

You removed a clause about the fact that the pope was warned that the death of a previous pope was an "omen". Let me make it clear:

Regardless of whether the omen was true, regardless of whether the pope believed in omens, regardless of whether omens are a superstition, the fact is that people around the pope warned him that the death of his predecessor was an "omen".

The "warning" and the pope's failure to heed the warning are the events that took place, and were highly significant at the time. There was (naturally) a very strong opposition to pulling down Old St Peter's.

Amandajm (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've removed what appears to be your uncited or personal comparison of the

Hi, Bobbytheonlyone, let me also welcome you to the Icarus article. I see that Haploidavey has said precisely what I came to say, but you may discuss this if you wish at Talk:Icarus#Jatayu. Cynwolfe (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Masturbation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without

I started editing some of the notes you added to the article on silk when I realised that you have just copied the wording of these notes from the website you gave as a reference. This is not allowed under Wikipedia policy except for short quotes which are clearly marked as quotes as this breeches copyright law. I am sure you made these additions in good faith, and they do contain a lot of interesting information but, for copyright reasons, I will remove them now. However, as there is so much good information here, I would be very grateful if you could rewrite the material yourself and then add it again to the article. Many thanks, John Hill (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samsung Galaxy S Duos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Bobbytheonlyone. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobbytheonlyone. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobbytheonlyone. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Suniel.jpeg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the