User talk:Bobdole2021

keep up the editing! Me (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobdole2021. I see you've been adding some material to some Bible verse articles! I've made some alterations to some of the edits. (1). You should not put your citation in the header - it messes up the indexing. (2). You can re-use a citation by naming it, which allows you to place the citation after each quote. (3). Quotations get quotation marks. (4). I added a {{

Hi Diannaa, thanks for the advise, and for changing the pages. I'll use those as templates for the next ones. Best, Bobdole2021

To see these redirects becoming pages. Hope the project works out well. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the positive feedback. There are a lot of verses in the New Testament, but I'll try to at least make a dent. Bobdole2021 (talk) 21:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobdole2021 and thank you for the articles which I encountered on New Page Review this morning, I was just wondering were you intending to make a template "John" (I had removed it from John 1:7) as the template didn't exist (if you wish to re-instate it). I will leave it in place if I come across it in future reviews. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 11:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961, Yes that was a mistake, thank you for noticing. Bobdole2021 (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bobdole2021, Thanks, a lot of effort must have went in there, nice articles! JW 1961 Talk 14:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseywales1961, Thanks, it does take some work, but it's interesting to look into these passages. Although with roughly 8,000 verses in the New Testatment alone, I'll probably give up before too long. Bobdole2021 (talk) 17:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've just come across some of your new articles about Bible verses. I see that you are including a link to biblehub.com in all of them - are you familiar with our guidance on external links at

Girth Summit, yes that makes sense, I'll move them down to their own section. Bobdole2021 (talk) 13:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobdole2021,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to articles. See

In the future, you can rename articles using the 'more' section at the top of the article and choosing 'Move', this will save you the hassle.   Kadzi   (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dr._Kadzi, Thanks for the tip, that does sound more sensible. Bobdole2021 (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On edits like [1], consider

The link seemed to fit the content. I don't mind it being deleted, but what was wrong with it? Bobdole2021 (talk)

Per

MOS:SEEALSO, wrong place since it's not a WP-article, but could fit in a "Further reading" section. I haven't read it so I don't know. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh right, yes it's Wikisource article. OK, I'll try putting it in a "Further Reading" section.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DIVINE 📪 18:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bobdole2021

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Greetings! Rather than copy-pasting verbatim quotes of sources into the articles, we'd prefer that you paraphrase, summarize, and write in your own words what the scholars are commenting on. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about that. I know my paraphrase won't be as good as the original material, but yes I think that's the norm with Wikipedia. My quotes were getting way too long.

In terms of paraphrasing the Bible... I guess it depends on the length of the passage. Bobdole2021 (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to include long, verbatim quotes of Scripture, that is what Wikisource is for. Elizium23 (talk) 06:38, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a {{

I think that makes sense. I'll use the PD-notice for future attributions. Bobdole2021 (talk) 22:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mary, mother of Jesus has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]