User talk:Brojam/Archive 1

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

It has been created. You could try expanding it further if necessary. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I wanted to follow up with you on why the template was removed again. There are a few issues that exist, that are unlikely to be resolvable. First, the ratings information is literally the same information in the episode tables above it, just compiled in a different manner. Second, the template itself already stretches the width of the article, and since we cannot use scrolls (because of Wikipedia print), we're going to run out of space as the show goes on....kind of out of space already. If you start shrinking it, then it will be even more illegible to read. The graph itself is hard to follow because of all the different bars you're trying to keep focus on. Most bar graphs do not keep that many items because it is too hard to keep track of what you're looking at. The same is true for the data sheet below it, as you're cramming 100 episodes into a tiny space.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

@Bignole: Thanks for elaborating. Really appreciate it and you're right with a few more seasons most likely still to go, it would become way too confusing with scrollbars. Maybe if the show reaches 7+ seasons (unlikely but we will see), a graph with just the season averages would be more appropriate. If the graph is made smaller (less wide), would it be good to include it in the main show page since the information is not already present (ex. The Walking Dead)? Brojam (talk) 00:42, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't think you need a graph for season averages, because people can easily compare 5 numbers to each other when they are lined up like that. It's just unnecessary. It's nice, but not necessary.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Brojam. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Flash vs. Arrow, Brojam!

Wikipedia editor

Thank you for re-accepting the AfC draft.

To reply, leave a comment on GeoffreyT2000's

Learn more about

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Flash vs. Arrow

A tag has been placed on

Portal

namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk)

04:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Flash vs. Arrow listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Draft:Flash vs. Arrow. Since you had some involvement with the Draft:Flash vs. Arrow redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk)

06:48, 21 December 2016 (UTC)