User talk:Brojam/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions for the period 2017. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Brojam, per a recent consensus on the talk page for List of The Flash episodes, episodes should not be displayed in the Ratings section until there is actual rating information available for them, which effectively means not until the day after they air when final ratings are available. You can add the basic information so long as it is commented out, but as duplicate information to what is in the episodes table (date and title), it should not be shown until the ratings have been published. I have commented out your additions for now. Thank you for your cooperation. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I was wondering, would you have plans to start making articles for Barry, Laurel, Dig, Felicity, Thea, Rip and Stein? It would be great to have them as articles. Many Thanks anyway.--92.40.148.102 (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Swarm ♠ 19:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draft:Gorilla City (The Flash). Since you had some involvement with the Draft:Gorilla City (The Flash) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

As of this series' most iconic characters (regardless of which iteration Cavanaugh plays), I think it's high time he gets his own Wiki article. What do you say? The least you could do is collect sources while I create a draft afterwards. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Definitely, will do. I was actually just thinking the same thing. I'm not exactly sure how his article should be split since he portrays so many characters, but I'm sure we can figure it out. I've started getting info for Barry Allen and put it in my sandbox. I'll create the draft for him soon. Brojam (talk) 03:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Robin or Green Lantern. Kailash29792 (talk)

03:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Perfect examples. And ya I'll take my time. Kinda want to improve the current episode articles and get "Flash vs. Arrow" to GA; as well as the upcoming Supergirl crossover article before working on this. Brojam (talk) 03:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I've created the draft, now it just needs to be further expanded. This source could also be useful. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

@

draft for the fourth season of The Flash so that when we get info about the next season we can add it right away. - Brojam (talk

) 03:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: I've added sources that I found to the draft. I will try to find more about reception since it's currently lacking. Let me know if there's anything specific that you need. - Brojam (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Nice work expanding it. Is there a search engine like this that helps us find reliable sources only? It could be useful in adding more sources. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Not that I know of. - Brojam (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

When you include that big, disgusting template (or re-add it like here), it just takes up more space and looks even uglier than a textwall. Why not just improve the article instead? -- Ajraddatz (talk) 07:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

I hadn't finished watching the episode so I did not want to edit the summary. While the template is somewhat big, it is important that summaries stay the current length and editors know of this

rule, especially with a new show like Riverdale. And see, now it's gone. Brojam (talk

) 17:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Definitely fair why you didn't improve it yourself - that's why I didn't fix it either. But idk, if it is going to be fixed within a day anyway then I'm not sure how useful it is. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Flash vs. Arrow has been completed.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=March 15, 2017}}. Not all websites allow archiving so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you can use.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:07, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Brojam (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

FYI, given you've nominated Flash vs Arrow for GA, I was planning to do the same with Invasion! once we get home media info. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Perfect. I'm also planning on nominating Heroes Join Forces in the future (but not right now). And best to wait until the home media info, I have a feeling they might include all episodes together like they did with Heroes Join Forces. It will be interesting to see if they include the Supergirl episode with the other 3. Brojam (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: You can probably go ahead with your GAN for "Invasion!" now that the DVD info is out and they were not released together. - Brojam (talk) 18:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

hello, can you tell me how to create a template, i saw you've create one for This is us Ratings ;) Judor92 (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

@Judor92: sure, what type of template do you want to create? A ratings one? Brojam (talk) 21:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

@Brojam: yes, ratings mostly :) - Judor92 (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

So pretty much, first you create the page .../wiki/Template:TV_series_name_ratings and then use this template {{Template:Television ratings graph}}. Couple of tips for creating ratings templates: 1) There should not be more than 20 eps per season (since that's the max the template can handle for the moment without it looking too confusing). 2) If there already exists a table with the full season ratings table on the same article, it is not appropriate to also include this template with the graph since the information is already there. 3) Only create a ratings template after a good number of eps have aired (~26 or 2 seasons) or confirmation that more will air (ex. This Is Us renewed for an additional 36 eps). Hope that helps! - Brojam (talk) 23:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk

The article Flash vs. Arrow you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Flash vs. Arrow for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

On this page, People keep on Deleting the iHorror Awards section for whatever reason. When infact, it's a REAL Award Show. Also it is not spam! And people are just delusional and too lazy to click on the link and look it up. Can you do something about it? This seriously needs to stop. Also, Drmies is such a asshole! And don't ever listen to that user!

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Power Rangers (film)#Plot edit war. I saw that you edited this article, and would be grateful if you contribute to the discussion. However I understand your edit was minor and that you may not have an opinion. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Was actually already planning to, but thanks for the reminder. - Brojam (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Looks like they are at it again. Could you please revert it back to your prior version? Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

I noticed with this edit [1] you removed all of the references from the production codes. However per

You only need to source a production code before the episode airs, which is already done with the references for the titles of episodes 6 to 9. - Brojam (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes I agree for director and writer and episode name, however production codes are intentionally listed separately. The MOS very clearly says they should have an RS.- Galatz^Talk 20:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

(

^TW

00:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:This Is Us ratings

^TW

04:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 MTV Movie & TV Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Transparent and Allison Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Article ideas

Do you think you'd be willing to start articles on other notable characters such as Malcolm Merlyn, Cisco Ramon, Thea Queen, Rip Hunter, Mick Rory and Diggle?82.132.220.28 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Flash v Arrow Peer review

How come you requested this, even though it is already a GA? What are you looking to get more, outside, insight on? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:10, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I would like to see if I can maybe get it to FA, but I'm not really sure what else can be added. - Brojam (talk) 21:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Heroes Join Forces

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Heroes Join Forces has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! - Brojam (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

So soon?!

I was surprised that Arrow's

Adrian Chase got his own article even before John Diggle and Harrison Wells (who don't yet have articles, despite being regulars in their respective series). Do you plan on creating a draft for Diggle? If yes, it should be Draft:John Diggle (character). --Kailash29792 (talk)

13:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

@

Adrian Chase if he would be interested in creating other character articles? - Brojam (talk

) 20:11, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Pilot (The Flash)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pilot (The Flash) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! - Brojam (talk) 13:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Gorilla City (The Flash) copyedit

Hello, Brojam. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gorilla City (The Flash) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 23:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Agents of SHIELD

Brojam, none of your sources definitively state when Agents of SHIELD will run; they just speculate about late fall or winter, nor is it placed in the announced schedule. Please stop forcing it into the table until we know when it will premiere. I'm at least the third editor to revert you; please discuss on the talk page. --Drmargi (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lian Yu (Arrow)

No, it's not about the upcoming episode, but the island where it takes place. Feel free to store sources, which I could use to expand it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 10:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

It's going to be hard to find and have enough info for this article. Does it really need it's own article; might it not be better to just include it under something like "Filming locations" on the main Arrow article? - Brojam (talk) 16:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

On second thoughts, I too feel there can't be a complete article on the island, but it can be converted it into an episode article. Sources may be found using this US newspaper search engine. --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

That will be much easier. I'm not up to date with Arrow so I won't be able to help content wise until I do but I'll be able to find you a bunch of sources. I've also started a draft for The Flash season 3 finale as well. - Brojam (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Breakthrough Performance Award

Hi, I'm Ajpolino. Brojam, thanks for creating Breakthrough Performance Award!

I've just tagged the page, using our

WP:GNG

that would be a huge improvement! The current refs mention the award, but I don't think they constitute "significant coverage". Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

the Teahouse

.

Ajpolino (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016–17 UEFA Champions League. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Infobox says "stats correct as of 10 May" and source for top scorers section has not been updated, and on top of that the final whistle had not been blown. Qed237 (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The whistle has definitely been blown. [2] - Brojam (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

It has now, but it had not when you edited. Qed237 (talk) 21:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Heroes Join Forces

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk

) 13:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Heroes Join Forces

The article Heroes Join Forces you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Heroes Join Forces for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 16:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Brojam. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
  Twinkle
  .
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of
  good faith edits
  .
• Rollback should never be used to
  edit war
  .
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm ♠ 04:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Wayback Google Book links

Pls be aware that Wayback does not work for Google Book links.......your adding 100s of dead links.....when its clear your trying to do the opposite. e.g ^[1] Best not to use the bot on articles based on scholarly publications vs pop media type pages.--Moxy (talk) 02:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

References

1. ISBN 978-1-4597-0989-8. Archived from the original on April 12, 2016. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help
   )

Thanks for letting me know! - Brojam (talk) 02:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

.

Sirofhpatfj (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Draft:J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk

) 17:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

I actually have been adding it (see [3]), but sometimes I completely forget to do it. - Brojam (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

It

Hey there; I was wondering why there was an edit made upon over 248 of the links on the It page --Bartallen2 (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

I archived the current links using a bot, to reduce the work when this article is submitted for GA or FA status. - Brojam (talk) 20:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

I would appreciate it if you'd let me finish the copy edit before you jump in. Thanks.Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry just wanted to fix that spelling mistake since it's repeated multiple times throughout the article. - Brojam (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! - Brojam (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

The Flash drafts

I think the drafts (season 1 to 3) are developed well enough to be moved to the mainspace. Are you okay with that? Or should we wait till season 4 premieres? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I would wait a little bit longer. The production and critical sections sections still need some work. I've compiled some good links [4] and will be cleaning them up in the next month so they can be moved before the season 4 premiere. The season 4 article should also be ready by then as well, just need to add all the info from Comic Con. If you have time, could you either add that info since there was a lot about the new tone of the show, plot info, etc. or work on completing the other articles. Thanks. - Brojam (talk) 13:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Tom Holland

Hi Brojam. I see your reasoning for the cluster of changes you made, but: (1) doesn't this guy have any notable works worth listing? Not even Homecoming and The Impossible? Why -- is he still too young to have notable works? (2) In the main photo he looks like he hasn't slept in days; it's pretty unflattering. But I suppose if his publicist wants a better one, he or she will replace it. (3) I agree the note about Star Wars was trivial, but the one about not falling for Hollywood flattery was not -- it's an insight into his personality and shows how he keeps his head on straight despite what he's doing. It all comes down to how lean an article you want. Thanks. CommonPleas 12:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonPleas (talk • contribs)

GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Farang Rak Tham (talk ) 19:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
· · ·

2017 Arrowverse crossover

I think we can start a draft for the crossover, especially since we have the air dates. We can at least get the skeleton of it created, with some of the info we've gotten very recently and from earlier in the year. What do you think? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes, sounds good. And {{

Arrowverse crossover episode}} needs to be updated. - Brojam (talk

) 00:17, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: will you create the draft? - Brojam (talk) 17:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

I can start the basis of it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

@Brojam: Here it is Draft:2017 Arrowverse crossover. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

^TW

06:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey!

I would appreciate your help here.Krish | Talk 12:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Precious

flash

Thank you for quality articles such as Flash vs. Arrow, Heroes Join Forces and Silence (2016 film), for updating Flash episode lists, for reverting vandalism like a flash, with rollbacker rights, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Back (TV series) template

Hi

Theo Mandela (talk

) 14:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

@

Theo Mandela: It's a bit hard to tell right now since there are no titles, directors or writers to properly determine how much room each will need. But for the mean time, I would put airdate=16 and viewers=13. - Brojam (talk

) 18:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother

You asked about the Celebrity Big Brother article names earlier and there's a move request currently on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother I think your opinion would be greatly appreciated! TheDoctorWho (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Your recent editing history at Ten Days in the Valley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being

p

23:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey, Brojam, I'm sorry you got caught up in PBP's latest effort to get at me. You don't deserve it or this template. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 02:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Since my name was mentioned, you may as well know, Brojam, that DrMargi is an editor with very serious edit-warring, incivility and ownership issues, which have resulted in blocks on four or five locations. But since you're both here now, why not discuss the appropriateness of your respective edits?

p

02:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Talk:Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 8).
Message added 04:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AussieLegend (✉) 04:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 19-2 (2014 TV series)

On 22 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 19-2 (2014 TV series), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the season two premiere of the Canadian television series 19-2 featured an uninterrupted, 13-minute single-camera sequence of a school shooting, based on the 2006 Dawson College shooting in Montreal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/19-2 (2014 TV series). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 19-2 (2014 TV series)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih^Talk 12:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Freedom Fighters to mainspace?

Given the crossover premise (which seems really cool), I was thinking the Freedom Fighters draft should be moved to the mainspace. We know it has started production, so that isn't an issue, and I don't see any other things holding us back from moving it. Thoughts? @Kailash29792: - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The fact that the animation already seemed to have progressed well, and Amell, Gustin etc. voicing their characters seemed like indication like the series is way beyond pre-production. Kailash29792 (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: Yes, sounds super cool. Agreed with the move since we now have the casting of Tovey. - Brojam (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Great all! Will get it into the mainspace momentarily. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: Might these be better pics for the infobox? [5] from [6] or [7] or [8] - Brojam (talk) 01:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: Pinging you again sine you were gone this weekend and in case you missed this. - Brojam (talk) 18:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, the one from lascosas.... would be better I think. I can make that change. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Re:Back (TV series) template

Hi again

Theo Mandela (talk

) 03:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@

Theo Mandela: For Back, it seems good as is and since the titles, directors and writers are short its more personal preference, but if you want to include the numbers then it could be something like |overall=5 |title=20 |director=20 |writer=26 |airdate=16 |viewers=13. Also note that you shouldn't include the "m" with the viewers and should include two decimal places if the data is available. For Tattoo Fixers, probably something like |overall=6 |series=6 |title=45 |airdate=26 |viewers=17, but its up to you how much you want for each. Like do you want the title to be extremely large so that the airdate and viewers are a bit more normal. In the end, the numbers should add up to 100. Hope that helps. - Brojam (talk

) 00:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

(

^TW

03:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

@

AlexTheWhovian: It works for Tattoo Fixers (although not all the same numbers), but doesn't work for Back. In fact, I've seen that happen a couple times when there is only one table, might be a bug. - Brojam (talk

) 03:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't look at the article. Yep, I see the one episode table. It's not a bug, it's deliberate, as articles with only one episode table don't typically need widths included, we just allow the columns to adjust automatically. Normally, widths are only added when we need to conform the columns of multiple tables. (Now, the "not all the same numbers", that's a bug I need to fix...) --

^TW

03:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Flash (season 4)

A tag has been placed on

Portal

namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk)

04:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

@

^TW

05:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Flash (season 4) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Draft:The Flash (season 4). Since you had some involvement with the Draft:The Flash (season 4) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk)

05:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Regarding that edit of yours that I reverted that you then reverted back

 Self-trout I was overcome with the urge to thank you for my accidental slip-up regarding the years, so thanks for pointing that out. I was a little frazzled when I looked at that edit and didn't think to consider the year! Whoops! - Purplewowies (talk) 18:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

No worries, I had also not seen the year and changed it, before realizing and changing it back again. - Brojam (talk) 18:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Re 'Lost in Space (2018 TV series)'

Re your reversions, I accept the IMDB situation and will find other sources - I can assure you the information is accurate. However, re "no need to mention timeline of casting" I would challenge that your feeling here is 'personal opinion' and that it is information people would like to know, it has value and doesn't violate Wikipedia policy as it is fully cited. RokkoRokkoRokkanno (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

@

WP:TVPRODUCTION. - Brojam (talk

) 02:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you, Brojam. I appreciate links to the TV show layout, I will familiarize myself with this before I start work again. I did remove the link you had put in as you linked to the original series Robot, which will NOT be appearing in that form. The new robot is a bipedal humanoid machine. RokkoRokkoRokkanno (talk) 05:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

List of episodes

I've been editing television articles on here since 2010 - and since 2014 on this account. When the second season of a show begins to air, that is when the list of episodes article is created. This has always been the precedent and there has never been an issue with it. Sometimes it takes a while for someone to actually create it, but once someone creates the article and the show is currently airing the second season, then that is when we do it. I would not describe my edit as "bold" as it's been done numerous times this TV season, and in every season past that I've been here. Take a look at the edit history of

Rome

(22 episodes), and I could go on and on and on.

I know you might be new to editing TV shows here on Wikipedia, but please believe me when I tell you that you are in the wrong here. I'm going to revert your edits one more time, and please don't continue to edit-war. What you are doing is completely unnecessary and you have no precedent or consensus to continue reverting as described above. Best, Rswallis10 (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

I can personally and safely say that your methods are far outdated. Please contribute to

^TW

00:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

@

AlexTheWhovian

: I HAVE "taken it to discussions". I've wrote on the article talk page and the discussion at the manual of style. My edits have precedence. Deleting a List of Episodes for a show that is in its second season has no precedence anywhere on this Wiki. This has never happened before ever. 00:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

As has been explain, simply because you are discussion it, does not give you a right to edit-war. Your disputed edits have been reverted. Stop while you're ahead. --

^TW

00:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Your

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

talk

) 05:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

The article

talk

) 05:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Brojam. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 05:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

The Flash

Can you point out to me where on The Flash Season 4 poster dark red is more prominent? If you use TinEye, you'll see that the dark colours elsewhere on the poster "bleed" into the red and present a dark red that is not actually present. Technology isn't always right, sometimes the human eye is. There is also nothing that actually states that the season colours need to be drastically different to each other. --

^TW

02:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

The dark red is actually quite present throughout the suit, in addition to being in the background around the suit. [9] While it's not stated that season colours should be different, it does help the readers when they can be. Which in this case, can be done. Why wouldn't we choose the one that clearly differentiates the two seasons? Not that it matters that much since neither of these will be the season's final colour anyway. -- Brojam (talk) 02:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for that link. It supports that I stated about it simply being the darker shades of the suit blending in with the red and other darker areas, to create a dark red that isn't really there nor prominent (A difference of 2.3% is barely anything - if it was 23%, then you'd have a point). The two colours of the Season 3 and the Season 4 colour I attempted to use, I already find them to be rather different enough. And it does matter much, given that we'll be using this colour for at least the next half-year. I can start a discussion of it on the article's talk page and gain some other editor's views, which might be the best option. --

^TW

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Brojam for writing the article 19-2 (2014 TV series) during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

DYK for J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World

On

J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World franchise was the "most-snubbed franchise" of all time at the Academy Awards, with 12 nominations and zero wins until its 2017 success? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, J. K. Rowling's Wizarding World), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Empire RT scores S1

Template:Empire RT scores S1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Hey!

Would you like to take a look at my FLC? I would appreciate it. Thanks.Krish | Talk 00:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: Sure! I'll have a look at it in a couple of weeks. - Brojam (talk) 07:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

"Parenthood" template needs to be changed - can you help?

Hi - I see you contribute to articles on the Parenthood TV series, so maybe you could help with this? The Parenthood template, which is shown at the bottom of Parenthood TV series articles, lists the first & last episode titles for season 2 (but not for other seasons). I don't think the episode titles are necessary, and tried earlier to change the template, but couldn't activate it so I reverted my changes. If you could help out with that, it would be much appreciated. Thanks for your time in reading this. -- Bwefler (talk) 22:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

@Bwefler: We only include articles in templates and not redirects so it is correct to only have the first two episodes of season 2 in the template and not the others since those are the only two episodes in the series that have separate articles. - Brojam (talk) 07:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I think I understand - thanks Brojam -- Bwefler (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 4meter4 (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Morty Smith

Mind taking a go at it? HarrisonSteam (talk) 21:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@HarrisonSteam: Sorry, unfortunately I don't watch the show. - Brojam (talk) 21:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brojam. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Riverdale Revert

As per your revert here, I will point out that UPCOMING doesn't cover listing an air date that is actually referenced through a

reliable source. Perhaps you missed the referenced episode title, which offers the air date

? That reference explicitly notes that the season extends into 2018. Therefore, the information added by another that I reinserted back into the article was cited, and not covered by UPCOMING.
I am loathe to redo the application of the year, so perhaps it would be more beneficial if you were to self-revert? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

@Jack Sebastian: A section heading for the upcoming season should be added to the page only when an episode table can be created for the season. However, years should not be added to said section heading until an episode actually airs in that calendar year. For example, for the eleventh season of NCIS, the heading on its list of episodes page would have been "Season 11" until September 23, 2013. After episode 1 aired on September 24, 2013, it would be changed to "Season 11 (2013)". And finally, once episode 12 aired on January 7, 2014, it would be changed once again to "Season 11 (2013–14)". How much more clear do you need it to be? - Brojam (talk) 00:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Supergirl revert

I would point out that what a

plot summary is not is a blow-by-blow recreation of the viewing experience - ie. the plot summary is a series of broad strokes, not George Seurat’s A Sunday on La Grande Jatte

. As per PLOTSUMNOT:

"The point of a summary is not to reproduce the experience—it's to explain the story. If the original is non-linear or experimental in its structure, the article should state that fact in prose, not through regurgitation of the plot"

The point is, the word count for an episode summary is not an electric fence to get as close to as possible. Economy is key. It isn't for covering lesser plot points which the reader can find by accessing the See Also or external linkage for more detailed reviews and summaries. We aren't a useless bucket for trivia. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Blue Book (TV series)

Hi Brojam, can you add this promotional poster [10] to the article please? Last time I tried to upload an image ([11]) it got a tag saying to delete it. Theo (edits) 17:06, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@

Theo Mandela:  Done - Brojam (talk

) 07:10, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

This Is Us (season 1)

Thanks for reverting

This Is Us (season 2) had been changed before you reverted it.) Thanks. -- Bwefler (talk

) 17:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

(Note: [email protected] made a few legitimate changes on it since I posted this.) -- Bwefler (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

I think my biggest issue is that these anonymous users and whatnot are taking the episode table plot summaries and breaking them into paragraphs. Should they be doing that to the plot summaries? (Plus they're changing the main cast list, like you had pointed out.) Thanks again for reading. -- Bwefler (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

I took care of it (I hope...) -- Bwefler (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Bwefler: I cleaned it up a bit. - Brojam (talk) 23:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)