User talk:Bubbagump24

The deletion of an article you created, 2012 MLS SuperDraft, has been proposed for the following reason:

Per

WP:CRYSTAL

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 18:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 2013 MLS SuperDraft, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JDDJS (talk) 21:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2013 MLS SuperDraft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should be userfied for now

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 02:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article 2013 MLS SuperDraft, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 MLS SuperDraft until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

how about keeping any traded draft picks, complete with references, on a temporary page within your userspace until the article will eventually be created? I did the same for NHL Entry Draft picks. Saves a lot of work. ;-) --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 10:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2015 MLS SuperDraft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Everything in the article at this time it TBD. Nothing to develop an article on, recreate when there are sources for information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ GB fan ~~ 15:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2012 MLS SuperDraft is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 MLS SuperDraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2015 MLS SuperDraft is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 MLS SuperDraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that using that date format avoids any nationalism issues, but there is no country on earth that uses YYYY-MM-DD as their standard date format. Since the article pertains directly to a North American subject, surely it should use the North American date format of Month Day, Year? –

I prefer to use the international format because it is easy to use and easy to understand. While MLS is North American-based, the long-standing goal has been to increase the international stature of American (and Canadian) players and grow the league internationally. An international format seems appropriate.Bubbagump24 (talk) 14:27, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So this is just your own personal preference, is it? Or is there a consensus among the members of the

Jay 14:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

You mean like the date that is listed after your signature? Oh wait, that's not the North American date format either. Maybe that should be changed, too. The international format is easy; it works. I doubt the dozens of people that visit this wikipage each month will be confused.Bubbagump24 (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand the reference to my signature. Why would my signature be in a mainspace page? Userspace pages don't have to follow mainspace guidelines since they're not for the majority of Wikipedia's readership to see. That article, on the other hand, is part of the encyclopaedia, and so we should make it so that everyone can understand it, not just those who are familiar with that style of date format. Wikipedia has these guidelines for a reason, you know. –

Jay 18:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Well...? –

Jay 17:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I could use your help researching and referencing the 2003 MLS SuperDraft. It appears nearly every pick was traded, some more than once. There are probably 30 trades we need to document. I'll take rounds 1-3 if you don't mind taking rounds 4-6. Before that if you could change the columns and place clubs before players since clubs pick players, not the other way around, then separate the players from their listed positions and create a column for positions. Then we can start researching the trades though it's time-consuming since MLS switched their domain name and basically deleted all press releases and league articles from prior years. It'll help to look at the 2002 standings and playoff results. That way you can set up a spreadsheet showing what the natural 2003 selection order was, then go from there. Thanks for your help! Bubbagump24 (talk) 21:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to commend you for a spectacular job on

Thank you. It's very nice to receive a positive comment. If you read of trades for 2012 (or later) picks please help me maintain the 2012 MLS SuperDraft page. Thanks again. Bubbagump24 (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I know there are reports, but if the official team website shows that the player is still on the roster, it's just me but I think it would be best not to remove the player until there actually full confirmation. Usually when they're no longer in camp, they're pretty much cut from the team, but I would wait to make sure. – Michael (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None of the Supplamental picks are on there but Ford and Attaway are still in camp. – Michael (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I do like the full job you did on the transfers. Excellent work. There is something that has been bugging me for awhile, though. I don't think players that never signed should go in the IN table, it's confusing despite your full explanations. This would include Bornstein, Findley and the draft picks who were never offered a contract. They need to be somewhere in the article, though. What do you think? DemonJuice (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the guilty party that put them in the In table... mostly because I was being lazy. I am all for removing unsigned players from it, though. I just think there needs to be a draft section so that the picks are documented. DemonJuice (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Intoronto1125 (talk) 22:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the edit on the Cory Elenio page. I changed his current team a little early it seems. Now i realize that many of these MISL players are just on break from the outdoor season. Funtimewithdave (talk) 19:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Scott (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NFOOTBALL

.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Scott (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Scott (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MLS International Roster Slots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eduardo Fernández (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

1. broke
   WP:MOSDATE
   on the article. It uses DMY.
2. broke
   WP:REPEATLINK
   . Both teams were already linked.
3. removed a valid reference for a bare link.
4. was done without adding an edit summary. Please provide summaries before saving your changes to articles, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 MLS SuperDraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 MLS SuperDraft (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 MLS SuperDraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2003 MLS SuperDraft may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable" style="width:60%"
• | [[Dallas Burn]]{{#tag:ref|{{#tag:ref|'''#52: MetroStars → Dallas Burn.''' Date???: Dallas Burn acquired this sixth-

Thanks,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 MLS SuperDraft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winston Griffiths (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013 MLS Re-Entry Draft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Joe Cannon, James Riley, Carlos Ruiz, Justin Braun, Colin Clark, Brandon McDonald and Danny O'Rourke

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bubbagump24, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2015 MLS SuperDraft, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello Bubbagump24. It has been over six months since you last edited your

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2015 MLS SuperDraft}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 1999 MLS College Draft page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hi, when you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter. This shows when the stats were last updated and prevents editors from accidentally updating the stats again. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kwadwo Poku (footballer, born 1992), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2017 MLS SuperDraft, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thestoppagetime.com/live-blog-2016-mls-superdraft/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

Template:Infobox MLS College Draft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bubbagump24. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from

It was suggested, during the recent deletion discussions for various MLS player articles, that they should probably have better referencing. So when you remove {{citation needed}} templates (and the {{updated}} one as well) as you did {[diff|MLS International Roster Slots|759928644|759921857|here}}, it's a problem. If you don't like it, discuss why on the article's talk page. If you don't think it's needed, discuss why on the article's talk page. Please do not simply remove it, particularly without explaining why in your edit summary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again and so did I. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop continuing to remove

Hello, Bubbagump24. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Carlos Vela. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fort Lauderdale Strikers squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joeykai (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bubbagump24. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to include soruces when adding content - I have done so for you at Stephen Sunday. GiantSnowman 10:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bubbagump24

Thank you for creating 2021 MLS SuperDraft.

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading