User talk:Business Facilitator

Welcome!

Hello, Business Facilitator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Tacielle (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation pages

If you would like to contribute to disambiguation pages, please read the style guide for those pages at

MOS:DAB. Entries should not end in full stops. Thank you. -- Fyrael (talk) 17:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Managing a conflict of interest

FAQ for organizations

for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;

propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Conflict of Interest.

The changes I've made on the page Qnet are from the trusted source i.e. the Company's official website. www.qnet.net > About Qnet.

Its better to educate yourself and verify the facts yourself. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Conflict of Interest. I'm doing some research about Qnet and I found it totally different from Co. Official website and what's available on Wikipedia. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make 10 edits to disambiguation pages before trying to edit the Qnet article? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If its an exact copy from co. Official website, then i believe that it must be more easy to get it corrected. People are looking for right information so provide it right. Business Facilitator (talk) 17:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 15:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Business Facilitator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m unable to understand that what I’m promoting or advertising…?? You are providing mis-leading information about a Global brand. Why can’t you yourself do some research instead of search. Atleast get a basic understanding by referring to the official website of the company. www.qnet.net > about Business Facilitator (talk) 16:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You made 10 edits in an attempt to

game the autoconfirmed requirement. I don't believe that you have absolutely no connection to Qnet or its industry. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Business Facilitator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its not about what you believe or not. Its about FACTS. Its about mis-representation of facts and you are supporting it. See I'm from Chartered Accountancy background, A Banker by Profession and infact I've nothing to do with the Brand. I was assigned a Due diligence assignment to verify certain facts and figures of the brand. While researching I came through this discrepancy in your content so I decided to atleast suggest an edit. I'm not here to temper any content. So it will be so nice of you if you can educate yourself about the issue and keep your ego aside Business Facilitator (talk) 02:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Apart from not really addressing the reason for the block, your attitude is horrible. Don't talk down to people you have to look up towards. If you don't calm down, and continue in this vein, you will lose access to this talk page. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(uninvolved non-admin comment) I will just say that you copied and pasted the brands own website, wikipedia isn't interested in what any company wants to say about itself only in what independent, reliable sources say about it. Further copying and pasting the company website is a copyright violation which is against not only Wikipedia policy but also the law. Also your statement that you have nothing to do with the company is contradicted by your next sentence when you say you were assigned a due diligence assignment on this company. Both cannot be simultaneously true, if the latter than you have a

WP:COI. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment. If you are from a chartered accountancy background, and if you were working on a due diligence assignment, then you understand the concepts of independence and verification with third parties. A public accountant on an attest engagement will confirm the balance of a bank account or loan with the bank or lender, rather than go on the client's assertion. The same concept applies here: Wikipedia articles do not repeat what the subjects say about themselves; we prefer the articles to be based on information from independent third parties with a track record of reliability, such as newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed journals, and edited and fact-checked books.

Any speculation on how your due diligence assignments would be affected by attempting to conceal third-party information that was found in the Wikipedia article is beyond the scope of on-Wiki activities. However, it is fair to say that if you were working on a due diligence assignment, then even if you were not engaged by the subject, you were engaged by a party that has an interest in the subject, so you have a conflict of interest by association. If you were editing the article on the clock, you would also need to make the required

paid editing disclosures

.

Finally, to clarify what Lavalizard101 said above: copying and pasting the company website is a copyright violation. Wikipedia policy forbids copyright-infringing edits to avoid any legal exposure to Wikipedia from the infringement. (Wikipedia allows non-free content under

limited circumstances and with specific requirements; many of the requirements mirror US requirements for fair use.) —C.Fred (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]