User talk:Calidumpluviam

Calidumpluviam, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Calidumpluviam! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at
Tiefstack Cogeneration Power Station
has been accepted

Tiefstack Cogeneration Power Station

, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:45, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for Woody plant encroachment

On 12 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Woody plant encroachment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that woody plant encroachment can harm the habitats of the cheetah, plains zebra and secretarybird? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Woody plant encroachment. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Woody plant encroachment), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Biochar carbon removal

Thanks for starting the above article. In terms of wiki-fying the content, we need a strong definition reference. Do you have a good reference for BCR itself? The CEEZER article hints at an industry consultation process carried out by the EBI, but I can't find anything. Wikiwayman (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikiwayman Thanks for this very relevant question. The term was indeed introduced by EBI and unfortunately the only available reference is an announcement on LinkedIn. I have referenced in the article accordingly, but am happy about suggestions on how to go about this alternatively. Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 06:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant. That's exactly what I was hoping for. A lot of the available background material refers to

Pyrogenic_carbon_capture_and_storage and I can see that the EBI expect that over time "BCR" will replace "PyCCS" as the term used when discussing the technology. At some point, I think it will be necessary to merge the PyCCS and BCR articles (unless there is a consensus here that they are different enough to keep them as two articles). For now, I think we need to add crosslinks to PyCCS and BCR on each page so that the reader can be fully informed about this developing field. Wikiwayman (talk) 09:15, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@Wikiwayman That is a very valid point. Admittedly, I was note aware of the article on PyCCS. I like the suggestion to crosslink the two articles for now. I will monitor the developments and if there will be no sufficient differentiation between PyCCS and BCR, we can merge the articles. I see that some industry stakeholders have started using the combined abbreviation "PyCCS/BCR" in their publications. In the end BCR might become the preferred term to market respective credits (due to the better simplicity of the term), while PyCCS remains the preferred scientific term.Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 09:47, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged - hope you can continue to improve Chidgk1 (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I have started working on the article and will continue to do so.Calidumpluviam (talk) Calidumpluviam (talk) 11:51, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]