User talk:Cassie Schebel

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cassie Schebel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

IP is currently blocked, I think I need an exemption for my account?

Decline reason:

The block on the IP range is anon-only; it shouldn't be affecting you. What message are you getting? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry if I'm not using this right, I'm very confused and just recently woke up <3 With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 13:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to create a new unblock request – It was previously declined because the block should not be affecting me, but it is. I'm sorry for the inconvenience or annoyance this is causing.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Cassie Schebel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just need an exemption from the IP block.

Accept reason:

Based on checkuser data, I have granted you

WP:IPBE for 3 months. Once that expires and if you become unable to edit, you are welcome to resubmit a request and you will be checked again. If everything still shows clean, you'll likely get an extension. Yamla (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kalvin Garrah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cassie Schebel! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I plan to continue adding to the draft and to fix these issues. Once I do that, should I just submit it again the same way? With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 23:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{British English}} is a talk page template. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for reverting you yet again, but in the most recent effort, the reference you added did not support the change you made. I would like to invite you to the article's talk-page to explain what it is that you're trying to achieve, and perhaps we will be able to establish consensus for some improvements. Thanks! --JBL (talk) 17:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for at least being nice about it. (This is why I normally stick to grammar fixes) With Love from Cassie Schebel (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cassie Schebel. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]