User talk:CessnaMan1989

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 22:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have removed one of your contributions to the article you recently edited. The paragraph you wrote about Gallaudet University Protest did not clearly explain how the protest affected the election. In the Deaf President Now article, there is no explicit mention of the election, although there is a mention of George Bush. Your contributions still exist in the article history and may be restored if you wish. Wikinights (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia core policies. Citing that case for such a broad inference about the Restatements that is not expressly stated therein means you are using WP as a first publisher of original research in violation of

@Coolcaesar: No, that is not original research because the inference is not broad at all. The statement only requires a single anecdote to hold up, and the example provides just that. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 23:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed this. In general, supporting a broad generalization with an anecdote is a rather weak kind of argument (which is why most lawyers don't risk it unless they have no choice). Also, the very attempt to use an anecdote to support a broad generalization is original research. Yes,

WP:NOR is that strict. --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

In addition to my edit summary here, please note that there is already discussion in the article of the possibility of it being undecidable in ZFC, in the section P_versus_NP_problem#Results_about_difficulty_of_proof, and the Aaronson paper is already cited there. --JBL (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hermitian matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantum theory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you entered the World War Two dispute manually rather than using the interface that is provided. The interface adds control information that is used by the bot that archives the noticeboard, so that disputes that are entered manually confuse the bot. I have removed the dispute, but I encourage you to re-enter the dispute using the interface rather than manually. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I'm sorry. I've never had to appeal for dispute resolution before, and I just did so incorrectly. CessnaMan1989 (talk) 01:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing all the high quality and balanced input to the World War II +related articles and discussions. I'll see what I can do to help in this. Cheers!3 Löwi (talk) 11:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, CessnaMan1989. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]