User talk:Chalst

Archives:

User talk:Chalst/archive-1: From start (11 Aug 2004) to 28 Feb 2005
User talk:Chalst/archive-2: From 15 Mar 2005 to 28 Jan 2007
User talk:Chalst/archive-3: From 10 Apr 2007 to 4 Apr 2016
User talk:Chalst/archive-4: From 11 April 2016 to 29 January 2022

Dickson baronets

Regarding your comments in this AfD discussion (1), I've had a go at making a draft of what the two new articles might look like (2). Do you think that's acceptable?

Assuming the AfD suceeds, perhaps we should also AfD this article (3) and similarly split it into two new articles.

Also, do you think the new articles should be called "X baronetcy of X", or "X baronets of X"? I've gone with the former in my sandbox draft.

Regards, Ficaia (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ficaia:- The title is the thing that endures when a baronet dies and that's called a baronetcy, so that seems to be the right term for the article. Yes, this looks good. Wrt. the Clifford baronetcies, I'd wait to see what happens with this AfD before proposing anything: we are at the mercy of the closer in terms of what is made of the rather complex AfD. Two things need to be decided on: first, what should we ask the closer to do? The technique is documented at Wikipedia:Splitting but I don't recall this being asked for at AfD. Second, the split articles should make reference to each other, since people may find X baronetcy of Y1 without realising there is also X baronetcy of Y2. — Charles Stewart (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Logic sourcing question

@Chalst: - which stable sources are meant to be basis of this article? I was under impression that universal algebra usually restricts not only quantifiers, but also avoids disjunctions and negations to focus only on atomic equalities. One could view disjunctions as term operations in multisorted FOL with boolean sort. Is this the direction? In any case, there are strong connections to term rewriting. I quite like the book

Logic for Mathematics and Computer Science. Prentice-Hall, 1998. ISBN 0-13-285974-2 by Stanley N. Burris ( http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~snburris/ ) that, unusual for an intro book on FOL logic, includes a chapter on equational proof systems, so maybe it could be used here?

@
Draft:Geometric logic? — Charles Stewart (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

I was talking about the article (stub?) Theory of pure equality. I mixed up your talk page with articles, it seems. Vkuncak (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC
Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our

AFC participants

; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at

WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Involvement

I apologize, I do not understand your question in the complaint and this was how I know how to send messages. 2607:FB91:13A1:621B:2F4F:7E59:C081:8FC6 (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{ping|[[2607:FB91:13A1:621B:2F4F:7E59:C081:8FC6}}- Your IP address has only been used to edit the admin review page. Could you explain your involvement? Without this, I don't think i can make sense of what you have written. — Charles Stewart (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Empirical Dynamic Modeling

Greetings. Thank you for review of the Draft EDM Article.

I have tried to address the posted comment in the draft article Talk Page.

Thanks again for your time and guidance regarding the article. Sincerely, J Park (talk) 08:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at

removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your help

Thanks for your help on the reliable sources noticeboard. I tried posting this on the noticeboard, but for some reason it caused the section below to get deleted so I decided to post here. Once again thanks for you comments and insight. Kamhiri (talk) 23:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I've watchlisted the page now. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cross-docking

Hello, Chalst. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cross-docking

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Metaphosphorous acid

Hello, Chalst. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Metaphosphorous acid

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nev Pierce

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 12:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Pytkeev space deletion discussion

Thanks for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pytkeev space.

I'm probably being a bit touchy here, but if "should have been visible in a BEFORE check" is supposed to mean that the AfD nomination was obviously unwarranted and I failed to follow WP policy in making it, I must disagree.

IpseCustos (talk) 07:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Luick-Thrams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Luick-Thrams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Luick-Thrams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

nearlyevil 665 12:03, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

 Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I take it this is to do with my edits in talkspace on The Grayzone? — Charles Stewart (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at 
removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Speedy deletion nomination of D. Wade Hands




If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read 
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
 to help you create articles.



A tag has been placed on D. Wade Hands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 07:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at 
removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
CZ Biohub Organization draft review

Hello! I'm popping by to ask if you might soon have time to review the CZ Biohub Organization draft? It seems like you felt pretty good about it, at first glance, but if you have any significant issues with the text and/or sourcing, I'm open to feedback. Thanks again for helping out with this. I've had quite a difficult time trying to find an independent editor to give it a thorough look. Cheers! Patricia at GMMB (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Just checking in to see if you've given any more thought to this section draft. Apologies if I'm pestering. I've unfortunately had no luck finding other editors who want to comb through it, and you expressed interest a little while back. I'd be very grateful if you could find the time. Thanks! Patricia at GMMB (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at 
removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment

Your feedback is requested at removing your name. 
 Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@Naypta — Charles Stewart (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Concern regarding Draft:Michael Luick-Thrams

request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. 
talk) 23:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message


Hello! Voting in the 
2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
 are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
 describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Your draft article, Draft:Nev Pierce

Hello, Chalst. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nev Pierce

".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission

and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]