User talk:Charleschuck

2002–2004 talk archive

Hey, I've archived my old comments. There were only a few of them, and they were placed here long before anyone really threaded/categorized their comments on talk pages.

I've further decided to do this so I can start off with a clean slate, since I've been recently on a flurry of editing again, and, who knows, someone might comment here.

--Charleschuck 17:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CyclePat is trying to make yet another attempt to merge moped into motorized bicycles. Please comment at Talk:Motorized bicycle. The thing is...his grand plan is to make the motorized bike article so bloated so that he can create a separate electric bicycle article since he makes...electric bicycles. The thing is...scooters, mopeds, motorcycles and motorized bike are all separate. I wish he'd quit. He's a pain. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 16:52, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I created a stub page for the Argus C3 a while ago and hope it can be refined into a useful article... I was amazed that there wasn't already a page for the world's most popular rangefinder camera. I also wrote the stub page for the Babetta moped, among other things. PS: as an interesting note reguarding the above comment, in my state motorized bicycles and mopeds are legally classed together. User:K-111

Please take a moment to put source and license information on this photo, or it will be deleted after 7 days. Also, if you have left source or copyright info off any other images you uploaded, please add that information to keep them from being deleted. If you need any help, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! -SCEhardT 20:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 13:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Thanks for uploading

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 08:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Seal of the Corporation of Kalamazoo.png

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk) 09:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Your user page

Hello, I found your user page while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of its earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 08:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Charleschuck,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seal of the Corporation of Kalamazoo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Swarm and Destroy

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Swarm and Destroy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarm and Destroy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fireandflames2 (talk) 04:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swarm and destroy documentary title screen.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Swarm and destroy documentary title screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"

Anglican Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anglican Church has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Anglican Church until a consensus is reached.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  06:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]