User talk:CheMoBot

Archives

Archive 1: Current Archive 2: Future Archive 3: Future

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tungsten(IV) oxide may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

Hi. Do you know why Template:Infobox drug/doc seems to have nobots template that denies this bot? -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if I ever claimed that this bot is listening to that.... Not a big issue, it is outside of mainspace. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I was looking at the validation of the CAS no. in praseodymium(III) chloride and noticed that it has the red X next to it. However, if you look at this diff (between the RevID on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemicals/Index and the most recent version, you can see there has been no change to this field. You can also click on the Common Chemistry link to see that it's a correct CAS no.

I've seen other examples like this in passing. Do we need to update our validated RevIDs? If so, what would that involve? Also, there must have been something that caused the red X to appear, but I can't easily check what - do you know what the bot was reacting to? Thanks! Walkerma (talk) 04:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've forced a refresh .. let me see what happens. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 08:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please look at Daclizumab and Basiliximab: both have the same CAS number validated by your bot. Can you check you reference please to see if there is no problem ? According to ChemIDplus, this CAS number is for Daclizumab. For Basiliximab we should have 179045-86-4 according to this source. Thank you Snipre (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Beetstra: Snipre (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Beetstra: I'm not sure if this was intended, but this bot doesn't seem to be checking/validating the drugboxes listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Index anymore. After looking at its last 3000 edits, I noticed that it hasn't validated a drugbox since February 19th, 2015 when it edited Melatonin's drugbox. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 20:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Seppi333: .. I guess it stopped when I did this on February 20th, 2015 ....

@Dirk Beetstra:

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

I've solved it .. I should also have done this. It knew that it had to follow {{Infobox drug}} .. it did not know what to do with it. Thanks for being vigilant .. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 05:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Seppi333: yay! --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 13:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glad things are working again. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 17:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]