User talk:Chinese3126

The M1 carbine article is currently on lock down. An administrator has requested some discussion from memeber of the Firearms Wikiproject. Can you take a look? Sf46 (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the appreciation. Reign in Blood will appear on the main page in two days, which is something i wasn't expecting ever to happen.. : ) so that's cool. There are just so many bad articles out there so it's nice to give them a "spruce" up. Cya around and thanks again! M3tal H3ad (talk) 03:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like the ones you have been doing for the last day or so are a quick track to yet another indef block. The "blank" York articles are a waste of our time and effort to delete after your vandalism. SirFozzie (talk) 04:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|I did not do vandalism, I simply tried to view the New York article when I made a typo. So therefore I made redirects for common typos of "New York", and some guy who was in a bad mood thought it was vandalism. I've done some other typo redirects before and have never been blocked like this.}

Please stand by as I contact the blocking admin. Sandstein (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. My comment here. Let's see where this goes. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at his other (deleted) contributions around that time. Asking folks to unprotect "Fat ass" and "fatass" so he can redirect it to obesity? This was a path of unproductive, vandalistic edits. I would recommend against unblocking, but will leave it up to the deciding administrator. SirFozzie (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem with redirecting

Fat ass from acquiring content such as "joe is a fatass lolol". I see no conduct here that would warrant blocking. Sandstein (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The article was a protected delete. Chinese3126 wished us to unprotect it so he could redirect it. It is not an appropriate redirect. The one that you link has been deleted 10 times, for example. SirFozzie (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was protected precisely because it was repeatedly created with the sort of nonsense or attack content that a redirect would have prevented. This user's request to create that redirect may or may not have had merit, but it was certainly not vandalism. I remain unpersuaded by the merits of this block. Sandstein (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truthfully, anyone who's searching for fat ass or fatass on WP isn't looking for obesity, he's looking for cheap laughs. I understand you believe the block was unmerited, that is why I said I wouldn't stand in the way of an unblock. SirFozzie (talk) 22:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Per discussion above. Request handled by: Sandstein (talk) 22:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chinese3126 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wow, I just got unblocked, now I realize I'm autoblocked because of my IP, is this getting crazy or what?

Decline reason:

I was unable to find an autoblock on this account. Please follow the instructions below. - auburnpilot talk 00:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. - auburnpilot talk 00:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|Well, since I got my block removed due to an appeal, I believe that my autoblock should follow suit.}}

Your block message should give you an autoblock ID. You have to post that here for an admin to unblock you. --B (talk) 03:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC) ::Never mind, I found it and have removed your autoblock. If you get another block message, please post the autoblock ID and anything else relevant from the block message. --B (talk) 03:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The February 2008

talk) 12:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Yulii Khariton

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 18:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SafeCatch

the guidelines on spam

.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of SafeCatch and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B.Wind (talk) 02:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello Chinese3126. Thanks for your support at the Military history elections. With your aid I was able to commision this ship to help plunder the coast of Military history for the third time. Na, just kidding. If you ever require any astance all you have to do is ask and you will see my ship on the horizon. Kyriakos (talk) 13:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The

talk) 04:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The

talk) 00:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The

talk) 00:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The

talk) 00:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Possibly unfree Image:I-31269.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wikidās-ॐ 20:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC) --Wikidās-ॐ 20:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Image:I-31269.jpg

section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright

infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:I-31269.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 22:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Qureshi

Not a problem, I created the majority of articles on {{CanadianTerrorism}}, and have tried to improve all the others. I don't suppose you knew Qureshi personally? I did have a question that was unclear in the news sources. Sherurcij ^{(speaker for the dead)} 01:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The

talk) 18:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The

talk) 00:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of "Woo woo woo woo woo woo wah ooooo wah"

A page you created, Woo woo woo woo woo woo wah ooooo wah, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article

.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The

talk) 21:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The

talk) 22:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008

talk) 21:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of FRS healthy energy

Wikipedia:FAQ/Business

for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek ^Talk 18:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The

talk) 22:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of FRS healthy energy

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

T) 17:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The

talk) 23:35, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The

talk) 16:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD nomination of FRS healthy energy

Lp1234 (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The

talk) 02:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The

talk) 03:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The

talk) 21:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheyenne Cherry

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify

their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Barack Hussein

That's a big talk page, if you need any help archiving I would be glad to lend a hand :) Anyway, I noticed your edit on the article in the title there. I was wondering: do you have any proof (like references in newspapers or something) that Barack Hussein Obama has ever been referred to as just 'Barack Hussein' without also saying Obama afterwards?

I have been recently informed that apparently that making edits like this (like how I tried to redirect

Elton Hercules John

. Apparently, it is okay to redirect full names including the middle name, or the name omitting the middle name, but even if nobody else is called Elton Hercules (or Barack Hussein) this is 'disruptive editing' and a mod can threaten to ban us for creating that redirect (or recreating it, as it were, if we disagree with it's speedy deletion because we wish to have time to contest it).

I am curious what your opinion on this issue is. I hope you do not mind, but I think what's fair is fair, and I may (with your acknowledgement) tag this for deletion to see if it will succeed as readily as the elimination of Elton Hercules. I just want you to know that I in know way think your redirect should be removed, but rather, I believe I am enforcing in the law as a moderator has told it to me. It's sort of like how cops may seize marijuana even if they think it should be legal, sometimes doing what you're told even in the most obscure situations may serve the greater good. Rather than disobeying the law, we find a situation in where obeying it shows its' most obvious ridiculous, so as to illustrate why changes in policy should be made. Tyciol (talk) 04:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of 300 movies

I have nominated 300 movies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Bang's

I have nominated Bang's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Sneck

The article

Marco Sneck has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

Zero citations/references or external links. Person does not meet notability criteria per

WP:BAND

and even beyond would reliable sources located and needs improvements. Only connections per "what links here" are part of a broader intra-Wikipedia referencing setup of similar articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

(talk) 12:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Marco Sneck

(talk) 19:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

RfD nomination of Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding

I have nominated Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Unscented (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glock fohtay

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

talk) 17:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:11, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the talk) 20:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 15:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 21:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 01:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

talk) 22:16, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 22:38, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page,

talk) 21:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Chinese3126! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Deletion discussion about Briley Manufacturing

Hello, Chinese3126, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briley Manufacturing whether the article Briley Manufacturing should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Briley Manufacturing, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the

Help Desk

.

Thanks again for your contributions! Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "

Military history WikiProject.[reply

]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Stephen Brazile listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stephen Brazile. Since you had some involvement with the Stephen Brazile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 01:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Brazile listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Steven Brazile. Since you had some involvement with the Steven Brazile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 01:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from

[majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Barack Hussein listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Barack Hussein. Since you had some involvement with the Barack Hussein redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 04:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Chinese3126,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Chinese3126. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ehnry viii listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

selbert 07:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Millennial Dawnists listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

Millennial Dawnists. Since you had some involvement with the Millennial Dawnists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

"S jackson" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

S jackson. Since you had some involvement with the S jackson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chinese3126&oldid=1181480656"