User talk:Chisnallmarty
January 2020
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 18:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
You've been warned before about edit-warring and the need for proper sourcing. I also remind you that there was a talk page discussion about this issue at
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg
Thanks for uploading
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo.jpg
A tag has been placed on
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Philipp von Hessen
The article
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see
March 2020
You are suspected of
- Per your messages on my talk page, it's fairly obvious that you're the IP editor that was previously blocked for disruptive editing on that page. I've blocked this account to match that block. Please note; you, the person behind this account are blocked. Until that block is successfully lifted, or expires, you are not welcome to edit Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 21:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC) ] |
UTRS 30708
https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30708 is open. As the SPI mentioned check user logs, I told user to consider appealing to ArbCom. I see no other recourse for them. In https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30499, they threatended legal action. That request was declined as not addressing reason for block.. @L235 and Kuru: courtesy notifications. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 02:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up, t · c) 02:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)]
- https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30708 is now closed. My response:
--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Per mine and Kevin's comments, apart from the SPI and having not looked at the other account, there are serious problems with your edits on this account in terms of edit warring, battling, incivilty and copyright. These would all need to be addressed. Any appeal must also address the original concerns warranting a block on the master account as well as the sockpuppetry. If you feel this response is inappropriate in any way, your best option is to appeal to ArbCom. They will need to consider the issues raised at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mythology3757/Archive, which include check user information. Thanks.
- https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30708 is now closed. My response:
Your draft article, Draft:Carlos Felipe of Habsburg
Hello, Chisnallmarty. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
{{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)