Hi, Chl, and welcome to wikipedia. I have replied to your concerns on my talk page. -- Josh
Hi, Chl,
I have seen your note on Manwithoutapast's talk page and would like to ask you to weigh in on the Mozart question on the Talk page of "Germany".
Thanks
Str1977 23:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you created that article but I couldn't find a reference to support a claim that the Siphonaptera are really a part of the Mecoptera. Could you look for what source you got that from? I left a few other points on the talk page too. Thanks - TaxmanTalk 15:52, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
Hello! I notice that you changed "castle" to "palace"; all the sources that I have say "castle" — what's the reason for the change? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response and the link. It's a pity that we can't just say "Schloss", as "palace" isn't quite right either (though you're right that it's closer than "castle" from the pictures). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:32, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
objections to merger
I've replied to your objections to the merger at talk:eumetazoa and invite you to reconsider. TheLimbicOne(talk) 02:50, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pope Innocent III
Thanks for your note. After reading Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor, I certainly agree with you. Someone else has already changed "king" to "emperor" in the Innocent III article. Best wishes, Halcatalyst 05:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As you have commented on the use of styles on this page before, you may want to comment/vote on the Request for Move pending at
Ernest Augustus V, Prince of Hanover.Lethiere 22:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Pretenders Ernst August
Please see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Ernest Aug. and constibute to the discussion there. I look forward to people assessing UE:should English be used in all these cases and how; would any sort of numeral be acceptable; what are the correct ordinals anyway; and Is there any other sustainable way to disambiguate these systematically. Shilkanni 10:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg
I've proposed a move; please let me know your opinion. If you want to split the discussion among several possibilities, please set up an approval vote. Septentrionalis 22:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help
Thank you for help on the Single-grain experiment article. It was DYK on October 12. I really appreciated it. Chris 01:56, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Palatinate
As you have provided input on this subject in the past, you may be interested in move requests at
Moin! Would you mind taking a look at a question I have asked at
Talk:County of the Mark if you have time? Olessi 01:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Henry II, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg
If you believe the redirect at
Proposed deletion process but it should not be blanked. Cheers. → AA(talk) — 14:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
OK, thanks. The proper article is at that location now; in-links are fixed. Chl 13:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Germany Invitation
Hello, Chl! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.
I don't understand why everyone is trying to delete your Qantas article! I tried supporting it, but am afraid I am way outnumbered and am so sad. It looks like it will be deleted soon =( so discouraging . . (comment made on user page by 67.49.154.250 (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.226.184.60 (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Syringomyelia edit
I noticed you deleted a figure from the syringomyelia article. It dealt with prevalence, and seemed to include a citation. You deleted it for NPOV. Clearly there is no neutral point of view violation or bias. I suggest you create a topic at the syringomyelia talk page to discuss your reasoning. - Cyborg Ninja 17:55, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles:
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alsace may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
possession as the imperial province [[Reichsland Elsaß-Lothringen|Alsace-Lorraine]], 1871–1918) was contested in the 19th and 20th centuries; France and Germany exchanged control of parts of
{|
* [[Arrondissement of Thann]] (52
* the EuroVelo 6 (Véloroute des fleuves from [[Nantes]] to [[Budapest]] (H) and
* the EuroVelo 15 (Véloroute Rhin / Rhine cycle route from [[Andermatt]] (CH) to [[Rotterdam]] (NL),