User talk:Cinematic Poetry

An article you recently created,

Comment: Articles in Wikipedia should meet the notability guidelines. The general notability guideline,

Thank you for the notification, you were right, I have fixed the sources. Thank you for the help in improving the Wikipedia article. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were also correct about this line: 'Azul no Azul is six minutes of immersion in the vast gamma of the color blue'. Therefore, it has been removed from the article. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 11:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cinematic Poetry! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! VickKiang (talk) 10:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Felix QW was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the statements made in the article draft are not sourced to the references provided; this includes hypotheses such as linking "Donaggio's condition of suspension" to "filmmaker Hito Steyerl's groundlessness" or statements that certain things are unclear or have never been revealed. Everything should be verifiable directly from the third-party sources provided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Milano di Carta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Felix QW (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cinematic Poetry! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Felix QW (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Norwegian short international film festival. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there is a potential copyright violation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Try taking a look at

WP:NPOV

(especially in the "Description" section)...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Milano di Carta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 15:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andrzej Bemer, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Vituzzu (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I will do my best to address the highlighted problems and correct the mistakes in my edits. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 01:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ruggero Berlam, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I have corrected the citation.

Thank you Cinematic Poetry (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F. J. Ossang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Umakant Bhalerao, thank you for the fast review. I have found those sources on the French wikipedia page for F. J. Ossang. They are precisely the same.

I'll work on finding other reliable sources and improving the article.

Thank you Cinematic Poetry (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please add more sources. The first two sources appear to be his profiles. While the third reference seems credible, we'll need more secondary independent reliable sources that offer substantial coverage of the subject.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and good to meet you. I see your main focus is film so, just for a descriptor of the project, on Wikipedia "visual arts" means paintings, sculptures, etc. and not so much film. That is covered at the WikiProject Film page. But hopefully your interest and knowledge includes paintings and the other visual arts, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Randy Kryn thank you for the clarification, yes I am indeed knowledgeable about plastic arts, even thought my main field is cinema. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1AmNobody24 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Live audiovisual performance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nobody (talk) 16:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1AmNobody24 thank you for the feedback. I'll find several more reliable sources. May I ask if the language of the draft is acceptable in terms of neutrality? I have recently been addressed as not-neutral in my previous writings, and I am working on improving it. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's kinda hard to say if the current draft is neutral due to the lack of references. But from what I can tell it doesn't look non-neutral. Nobody (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved your recent article to draft space by giving a valid edit summary. Please check and improve if you're interested. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) Maliner (talk) 09:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Maliner, thank you for that, I actually did not mean to publish it. When I pressed published I thought it was a draft, but surprisingly it was published directly instead. The page needs clear expansion. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinematic Poetry: Thanks for your understanding. Feel free to submit it for an AFC review once you complete writing it so that one of our reviewers can check it. Good luck. 🙂 Maliner (talk) 10:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maliner, somehow the template used to submit the draft for review is not on this page. Can you assist me on this matter? Thanks Cinematic Poetry (talk) 07:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for you. 😊 Maliner (talk) 07:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the lightning-speed help! Cinematic Poetry (talk) 07:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. 😌 Maliner (talk) 08:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet

WP:NARTIST

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryoichi Kurokawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:NARTIST list. However, I need to research better references to prove it. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 08:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Organism (1975)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBritinator (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

2018 VE XXV: The Postmodern City Symphony: Hilary Harris' Organism in the Space Age might be a reliable source but need to show it was published in a peer-reviewed journal. Common Good Collective is not a reliable source and boingboing.net relies, at least in part, on Wikipedia and IMBD, neither of which are reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Organism (1975)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Do not remove a maintainence template from an article you have created. Thank you Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 07:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RetroCosmos thank you for notifying me. I didn't know I could not do that, since the COI issue was solved. Maybe you could remove it then. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 07:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How was the COI solved? I see you did disclose your COI. However, as far as I know, that is a remedy to removing a UPE tag, not a COI one. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 08:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RetroCosmos I received notification that the COI has been deleted from the COI page. Nevertheless, I won’t touch the Template, I’ll let other users do that. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 08:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RetroCosmos To be more specific, I did not disclose any COI, because there was never any.

I explained on the COI page how that accusation was a genuine mistake by another user. Now, the practice has been archived, but I can’t fix the pages involved because as you correctly pointed out: I can’t remove templates on pages I create. This will probably result in those pages keeping that templates. Maybe I should add a new message on the article’s talk page. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I have a feeling this is probably notable, but the sources aren't enough to satisfy

WP:NFILM

, either. Please review the NFILM criteria and provide evidence that at least one of them is met, or else cite sources that demonstrate GNG notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Organism (1975)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing thank you for the message, definitely a notable film worth a wikipedia page. Unfortunately there is an overall lack of good references since it is a pioneer work created by a female artist in the 70s, and the following works by Godfrey Reggio inspired by this short film have taken the press and the academia attention by storm. I will do more research, find new sources, and re-submit. Would it be possible to add a template to the draft which asks for help to other film scholars? Cinematic Poetry (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it seems a worthwhile subject. Good luck with the source-hunting!

You can place the {{Expert needed}} tag on it, if you wish; I'm not actually sure if that works in the draft space, but worth a try.

Also, you may want to mention this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film, in case any of the project members can help.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing thank you for the info. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing thank you! Posting the article on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film has been incredibly helpful. Cinematic Poetry (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad it worked out.

I'll just mention one small thing: I didn't patrol this article myself, I'll leave that to another new page reviewer, because I feel like I'm a bit involved myself now. There is a small chance that they might think it not notable and send it back to drafts, but TBH I'd be quite surprised if that happens.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for your submission! Aside from one, are there any other reliable sources to establish notability? This topic might be notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crazy Lotus (2024) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 13:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:F. J. Ossang. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 09:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cinematic Poetry. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission reads more like an

neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Live audiovisual performance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 13:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Most sources seem to be archives of the film.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 08:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I think this falls just short of our notability requirements - the references provided are all reasonable but the most in-depth are interviews (which as

primary sources do not aid to the demonstration of notability) and the film review; everything else about Ossang is a relatively brief 1- or 2-paragraph blurb. Please add additional independent reliable sources

that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F. J. Ossang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the note left by Hoary on the draft regarding copyright attribution. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]