User talk:Claus at Name Defend DE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Claus at Name Defend DE!
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

October 2014

block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for your message. However, my edit is a constructive edit to uphold a core policy of the Wikimedia Foundation's "Terms of Use" - to prevent impersonation of the named organisation. The controversial deleted text was inserted by another paid editor "Sitush", against whom the affected organisation has very recently filed a criminal complaint in India, including for impersonating a History graduate from Peters House / Cambridge University so as to mislead the Wikipedia community and pose as an authority. Claus at Name Defend DE (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sitush is not a paid editor. We've gone through this many times.
talk) 12:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at India Against Corruption shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's

talk) 12:38, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at

talk) 12:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

legal threats, and block evasion as a probable sockpuppet of User talk:Name Defend IPA. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Euryalus (talk) 13:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

@Admin:Euryalus I have emailed you, as there are issues pertaining to the author of these falsehoods. Claus at Name Defend DE (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]