User talk:Compdude123
| This is Compdude123's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 45 days  |
 | Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
|
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Compdude123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:DEFUNCT" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Wikipedia:DEFUNCT. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:DEFUNCT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
]
The WikiEagle - January 2022
 |
| The WikiEagle |
| The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
| Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:United Airlines logo 1974-1993.png
Thank you for uploading image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with
section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page
. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the ]
Good article reassessment for Alaska Airlines
Alaska Airlines has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Real4jyy (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about this. As a major contributor to this article years ago, although I do agree that some unsourced content needs to have sources added, I fail to see the issue with the fact that it uses "excessive primary sources." Why is this an issue anyway? It's hard enough to get proper citations on articles; why make it harder by discouraging use of primary sources? I strongly disagree with this policy anyway and I could understand if the concern if this was a featured article, but to make this a reason to re-assess the Good Article status is a bit of a stretch IMO.
- Also, any reason why you don't just find primary sources yourself instead of making others do the work to meet this stupid rule? Compdude123 (talk) 04:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)