User talk:Coolgamer

Welcome!

Hello, Coolgamer, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

All the best Mozzerati 21:48, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)

thanks for that, I guess at that point I was pretty much on auto-drive after about 20-ish articles.

Just because a website has identical text as one of our articles doesn't mean our article is a copyvio. In The 158-Pound Marriage the website you link to actually says at the bottom of the page that it was a copy of our article! Generally for articles created a long time ago, it's pretty safe to assume they are not copyvios. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 19:21, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Ack! I missed that... thanks for the heads-up. Coolgamer 21:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed your edits on the

• Thanks for the compliments, but I never edited that page. Perhaps you're thinking of another gaming page that I edited? And thanks for catching my spelling error... that's what I get for typing too fast. Coolgamer 20:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the barnstar, I try to be nice to everyone I meet, and I need to edit more. :) --Flockmeal June 30, 2005 00:54 (UTC)

• I have rewritten this article so that it is about the INXS song. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it. Capitalistroadster 16:39, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • Sweet Jimbo! You've more then saved this article from deletion! When I saw it, I changed my vote for deletion right away. Good work! Coolgamer 20:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten this article to establish the notability of this band as per

You recently tagged the image Image:Paulmonoxide.jpg as being in need of cleanup. Could you specify in what way it should be improved? –Mysid 12:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Late addition to the talk page- your issues have been addressed, and my reasons for listing said image are now in the images talk page. Coolgamer 21:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha! Looking back over previous Help Desk questions I noticed you were having some trouble with the table formatting. I've fixed the code, and shifted the order of some of them for aesthetic purposes (ie: Avoiding unsightly gaps.) If there's a different format you'd prefer, or if you need any other help, just let me know! GeeJo _{(t) (c)} • 01:58, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I edited the Bipolar userbox and created a second userbox for Type II. Right now, you're showing Type I. If you are Type II you may want to change the userbox to USER BIPOLAR2. Thanks! CenozoicEra 01:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Firerages.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Agnte 16:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to Image:Morocca.jpg, the nosource tag stated that a source should be given so that others may verify copyright status. When you changed the tag, you did not provide a source for the image for others to verify its status. Therefore, the tagging was reverted. The message on the nosource tag is directed at the uploader. It is his or her responsibility to follow up. - Slo-mo 01:33, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I think you have more userboxes on your page than I do ;) - nathanrdotcom ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 22:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on

My German may also be off, as I've not lived there for a few years, but what I said, roughly, is: Unfortunately you didn't understand me. For you to say that you believe you'll win (implying your meaning is similar to the common Nazi exhortation), is unheard of. Do you really mean that? Mackensen (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't mean it in the same context. It's so often used that way it's what you think of, though. I did it on purpose in an attempt to convey sarcastic disapproval towards not only the rapid deletion, but the "war" attitude. Seriously, it's Wikipedia, and we're all fighting each other. Sarcasm does not commit to text well, and I've changed most of my old text to different statements. Coolgamer 18:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Coolgamer,

I'm glad you support userboxes and appreciate your support. However, if you list on Tfd, make sure it's a serious one, in case it IS accidently deleted, such as {{User nocol}}. Plus, it may look hypocritical on our part. Just keep that in mind the next time you Tfd something.

Now on

Good job nominating the nocol box for deletion. I get so mad every time I here some little boy say I like blue, pink is for girls. The color sexism needs to stop.--God of War 20:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm entirely unsure why you are angry with me about, and I feel that you've very much misjudged me.

"What if we don't? Like you just said, Jimbo, good buddy, you'll just mass delete them if we don't bend to your will. Who cares, right?"

I did not say that I would mass delete userboxes, and I have very much avoided saying anything to give the impression that people should "bend to my will" -- whatever that means.

I have tried very hard to remain careful, measured, neutral, and to ask everyone to follow a slow, thoughtful, loving path.

I am sorry that you have perceived things differently, and if you have any concrete suggestions about how I could help at this point, I am happy to hear them.

--Jimbo Wales 10:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check out my "Conditional Support" entry on the

... I might possibly consider it in the future, theoretically. Coolgamer 17:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I happpen to like it. —

T • C • W) 19:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm hardly trolling, seeing as you already have two other abusive admin barnstar awards that you've kept on your page, and seem to have no issue with. Enlighten me as to how my award bestowed to you is any worse? Coolgamer 22:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add trolling images to my userpage. It is vandalism. You will be blocked. Goodnight. --

Ooh, looks like somebody's got a case of the Mondays! Coolgamer 01:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. No comment. ("No comment" is also a comment) —

T • C • W) 02:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for awarding me! This really brightened my day =) --Shell <e> 01:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please put all tasty Easter wishes here!

Hi. You're a supporter of userboxes, and there's currently a policy poll going on about userboxes that might solve the speedy deletion issue. I encourage you to vote if you haven't already. Thank you. Dtm142 21:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coolgamer. I think it was you who added the section on the 'True Love' game that a demo for the sequel was released but is rare. If you are able to, I was hoping you could contact me with where to get it from. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! --Rebound 16:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you gave me a userbox barnstar several months ago. I was wondering what it's for? I do not recall ever making a contribution to the userbox wikiproject. >Radiant< 21:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Then I must conclude you were mistaking me for somebody else. >Radiant< 16:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree with the ideas that (1) my blanking the page had anything to do with userbox deletion, and (2) my blanking the page warrants a barnstar. Simply put, I do not accept this reward, and will not be considered an important figure for either side in this feud. Let's drop the issue. >Radiant< 20:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you reverted the edit on Steve Irvin, you actually blamed on me that I made that edit. Well, let me tell you, I did not make that edit, I was trying to revert that edit beacause a another user tried to vandalize that article. You are supposted to be blaming the user Shortcirkit for that, NOT ME. By the way, here is the link to the edit that he made, thanks.--Jsalims 22:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just paste from the edit conflict box, or you are undoing others comments. You need to copy only your comment, and then add it. Prodego ^talk 01:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Yes what he said. You are erasing others comments and another time will be considered vandalism. Add your comments by adding them not by taking away others. Please. --Xiahou 01:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC) My comments were erased by HIS edits. Coolgamer 01:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean this? That is completely inappropriate for many reasons, under

WP:NPA for example. Prodego ^talk 01:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. PTO 01:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attack? I'm confused, as I was being serious. Coolgamer 01:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can not attack another editor, you can provide constructive criticism, but not attack them. See

WP:NPA. Prodego ^talk 01:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

(edit conflict)Your note had a sarcastic undertone, which sounded very rude. This is probably due to the

aspie effect, but hey...who knows? I'm sorry. (I've got it too...) PTO 01:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Again with the attack stuff. I never cursed or argued with him. To me, it was a simple polite invitation for a cozy cup of tea. I was thinking peppermint, but if he prefers traditional, that's fine. The queen will be most disappointed if he can't attend, however. Coolgamer 01:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, I remember the days when humour was totally okay in comments. Even jagged humour. Coolgamer 01:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21_Street_Fighter_character_articles has been reopened by request. Please join in the discussion so we can finalize a compromise acceptable to all parties. Vassyana 22:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21 Street Fighter character articles has been closed. When reopened, a clear strong consensus was displayed, with very few and limited objections to the consensus. Unanimous assent is not required for consensus. A supermajority supports the previous compromise and is unwilling to further accomodate the dissenting view. Therefore, I have closed the mediation accordingly. If you have any questions, comments or concerns, you may address them on my talk page. Vassyana 17:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have expressed interest in, Qian Zhijun, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qian Zhijun. Thanks. ALTON .ıl 23:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You commented on

I just became aware of the project so I joined and I have reactivated it from its status of inactive – Wikipedia:WikiProject Rave. __meco 10:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our

talk) 17:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Medition

I've offered to take your MedCab case at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-12-17 United Airlines Flight 93.--Phoenix-wiki ^{talk · contribs} 17:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Doctor Steel

See here. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Watch it..

Coolgamer, it was about your talk page that increased tensions. Not because you had a different opinion than mines. Keep in mind that the "copyrighted images" issue may be false, however, as I was scanning through your talk page, it appeared that you were doing something like that. And keep in mind that I don't harass, unless I have been angered by the multiple negative responses simultaneously, which have almost no control over since I suffer from psychological disorders. If you are trying to get me blocked, you are getting yourself wrong. A few months ago, I have turned in a harassment report. A real harassment. The user was Prada de Lulz or something. If you don't believe me, check and ask. Thank you. A please keep in mind that I haven't edited on the talk page you are talking about recently. Prowikipedians (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not even posting threats on your page. If you believe I'm using this account as a vandalism-only account, check my edits. I'm very positive that all of my edits were good-faith edits. Period. Prowikipedians (talk) 07:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you were permanently blocked from the site. I guess your argument was invalid. Coolgamer (talk) 19:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Logotbyte.jpg

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Footage

But as I said at

WP:ELNEVER. The footage is in breach of YTV copyright. Peanut4 (talk) 00:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I wouldn't object to a still image of the event as long as it passes the rules for images. I do intend to take this to FAC. Any non-free image will get picked up there anyway.

As for the reasons for the footage, I think you ought to take that up with the correct authorities rather than put it here. West Yorkshire Fire Service, YTV, the Popplewell inquiry, councillors and politicians, at the very least, agree the footage should not be released and is instead only used for fire training. Peanut4 (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Steel

Umm.. here you go:

talk) 03:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

My edit to Dennis Kucinich

Sorry my edit summary appeared harsh. If you must know, I was a bit pissed off at the time. Lockesdonkey (talk) 07:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 05:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy

It would be surprising if you were the only person capable of finding these photos. They have been all over the forums and shock sites, so please don't keep on offering yourself as a source.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cannabis

You are invited to join WikiProject Cannabis, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to Cannabis. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to the plant. The WikiProject Cannabis group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Welcome! Be sure to read the project page, the corresponding talk page, and subpages (collaboration, assessment, etc.) to learn more about the project and how it operates. I always recommend adding the project page as well as the collaboration page to your watchlist so that you can remain up to date with what is going on. I look forward to seeing your contributions!

Proposed deletion of Pipi & Bibi's

The article Pipi & Bibi's has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to establish its notability as required by

Wikipedia General Notability Guideline. Fleet Command (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fleet Command (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Articles for deletion nomination of Pipi & Bibi's

I have nominated Pipi & Bibi's, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipi & Bibi's. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fleet Command (talk) 04:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for double-post, Coolgamer. A problem in Twinkle caused this double post of AfD warning. Anyway, I think you've gotten the message. Fleet Command (talk) 05:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Please remove this section! The Wifechaser (talk) 05:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed? The Wifechaser (talk) 12:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sestak/Toomey

The forecast have indeed changed - check the footnotes. Flatterworld (talk) 22:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vic Viper game article.png

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Drew This

The article

I Drew This has been proposed for deletion

because of the following concern:

No separate notability. No sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:02, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Happyhardcore3.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Better source request for File:Rmaddison.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Rmaddison.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should a separate article on the dried flowers and leaves variant of the Cannabis plant be made?

Talk:Cannabis (drug)#RFC: Should the section about the dried whole-flower-and-leaf preparation have its own article? If you have the time, would you please analyse my request, as you interested in our Cannabis project. Do you think there should be a separate section for this topic? მაLiphradicusEpicusთე 21:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Escape from the Everyday

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. TheGGoose (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Serotonin.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Edward Behr

Hi - sorry for such a random question, however, I noticed you had participated in the Talk page for Edward Behr. Do you happen to know if his last name is pronounced "BEAR" or "BEER"? Thanks, in advance - DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:45, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Coolgamer. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Coolgamer. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The 
guide to formal mediation
, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 25 March 2018.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by

talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 23:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Request for mediation rejected

The 
mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coolgamer. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Coolgamer. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trilobyte logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  ★  Bigr Tex 23:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benny Boom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benny Boom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Boom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 12:53, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of May Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article May Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/May Club (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rmaddison.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rmaddison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]