User talk:Creuzbourg
A barnstar for your efforts
The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
Awarded for you efforts in helping to tidy up and standardise the article ] |
The article List of Graduates of the United States Military Academy Class of 1829 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The United States Military Academy has a class of graduates every year, no indication why we should be cataloguing them or 1829 in particular.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 21:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Graduates of the United States Military Academy Class of 1829 for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Graduates of the United States Military Academy Class of 1829 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Reywas92Talk 18:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States Military Academy bottom-ranking graduates (1818–1899) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Military Academy bottom-ranking graduates (1818–1899) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Reywas92Talk 19:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Pierre de Rigaud, marquis de Vaudreuil-Cavagnial edit question
Hi, regarding your edit to Pierre de Rigaud, marquis de Vaudreuil-Cavagnial: Is the source any more specific? Is it saying that 14 of the enslaved people Vaudreuil held were African-born and two were of African descent born in the West Indies or somewhere else? Or were the other two enslaved Native Americans? Is there any context about when he owned them? (When Étienne Perier (governor) was governor of Louisiana, he received slaves as part of his annual salary; was it a similar situation here?) Thanks. — Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, no. That's all there is. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! I found a copy of the book online and was able to make a few additional contextual edits. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Soldiers of New Hampshire has been nominated for splitting
Category:Soldiers of New Hampshire has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Britain's German allies during the American Revolution has been nominated for renaming
Category:Britain's German allies during the American Revolution has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
The redirect Andrew Sinclair (privy councellor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § Andrew Sinclair (privy councellor until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Cleanup notices in Indian police Ranks and Insignia templates
Hi. Just as an FYI, the cleanup notices added to
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (Sashastra Seema Bal)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (NSG)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (CRPF)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (CISF)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (BSF)
- Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/India (Assam Rifles)
messed up the pages these templated were transcluded in (like Central Armed Police Forces), since they're used inside tables and the notices broke those. I've edited the templates to make the notices table-compatible, but I thought I should also let you know, since you probably didn't mean to bring even more attention to the issue in this manner. :) Gamapamani (talk) 08:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)