User talk:Curtisloew

Please see WP:No personal attacks. I have blanked the derogatory remarks. Please note that a user talk page is also community property and that all of our actions are subject to scrutiny. While this was a "gentle" personal attack, wikipedia does not tolerate such things. This can lead to banning. Fiddle Faddle 15:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop vandalising my user page. —The preceding

unsigned comment was added by Matthegav (talk • contribs) 14:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply

]

Repeated Vandalism

Please do not make personal insults on my character, or aleging that I engage in sexual acts with children.

I have informed the Administrators.

Matt Gavan 14:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation

An important message

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps inadvertently, you may have

biographies of living persons

.

If you may have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things:

If the material is still there, remove it immediately. You may wish to use an edit summary like "Removing possible defamation" to prevent it from being reverted.
Leave a note on the
administrator's noticeboard
saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. Do not repeat the claim(s). The revision(s) containing the material can then be deleted from the page history.

Canadian-Bacon 19:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Canadian-Bacon 19:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam forde

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page

explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pboyd04 22:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Jonathan schuman

CSD a7

.

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon

}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Darksun 11:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stuart Barclay

section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox

for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 09:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 10:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]