User talk:DJS24

DJS24 Userpage

edit header | edit archives

Archives November 2008 & prior

It's just you. But besides that I, of course, looked at the discussion before deleting. This was a hard decision but in the end I was more convinced of User:Suntag's comments than the others. Closing a discussion is not about counting votes and I have no reason to care about the fact that Suntag's account is no more then a few months old. Also, of course it had an open discussion, so I went to work at PUI, closed the discussion as delete and accordingly deleted the image. Where exactly, besides the fact you don't agree with the result, is that against policy? That is how every discussion gets closed on Wikipedia. Where exactly was the discussion that a Commons administrator has no problem with the image? I did do some homework before deleting and saw this debate at Commons, I assume about the same image. That discussion also closed as delete. Garion96 (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bummer if you got your feelings hurt, but frankly, listing Banfield as Mr. Banfield when you know he's got a first name (and I question that you did despite your assertion to the contrary) is just silly. Characters' names are always listed first-and-last. If you don't know them both, leave it for someone who does. I've also reverted your petty revision of my editing (get your own back, did you?) since you took a grammatically correct sentence with Wyle's name as a subordinate clause and changed it to a grammatically incorrect one. I'd suggest, again, that you check what you're doing before editing, but I don't want any more fuss over this. Drmargi (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never said my feelings were hurt, you put a personal attack in your edit summary (as you did above too) against a correct edit I made to the ER page. As for characters' names are always listed first-and-last, I guess I'll see several corrections done to that section then. As many are listed as Mr. or Mrs., if they even have a name at all. --DJS24 20:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I'm with DJS24 on this. "Be kind to newbies" applies even if he/she isn't a newbie. Civility rocks. Dave Golland (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O, Great DJS, I shall finish the page tonight, dumbass. BW21.--BlackWatch21 00:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your archive system is done. BW21.--BlackWatch21 21:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about this for your talkpage? BW21.--BlackWatch21 15:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put the 24 page back it looks stupid. BW21.--BlackWatch21 22:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like it; it needs a change -- the project needs a lot of work. --DJS24 22:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We know the surname of Mitch in Las Vegas. It's written on a paper that Ed has in his hands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pietjeklap (talk • contribs) 13:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we're starting the discussion on A-Class here today, thanks for signing up! I hope you can present your views. Thanks, Walkerma (talk) 07:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. I wasn't the one to cite that website originally, and personally I find the citation to be fine. However, I don't mind leaving it off; everyone's views on what should and should not be used as a citation are certainly going to be different. On the same strain, though, should not then the numbers of viewers for the first several seasons also be removed, since they're not cited at all? It would seem worse to leave information not cited at all than to leave information cited by a questionable source. Sahasrahla (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit that included removing Wyle from the infobox because your revert removed several pieces of current, newly added information. Also, the last I understood it was agreed Wyle would remain in the infobox only when he appeared in an episodes. Apparently, consensus on that is a moving target I can't follow. Whether I know Wyle is returning or not isn't relevant to the edit I made. Drmargi (talk) 08:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the thing was a b***h about balancing, here is a possible smaller version of WW Xbox without spell check. BW21.--BlackWatch21 21:57, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks ok, need to move some things sround. I like it though. --DJS24 22:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

um......[1][2]. BW21.--

How hard is it to create one? And how do you create one? --Thejadefalcon (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how you wont buy PS3, they finally making this

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either

The Video games project has created a

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the
  Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the
  WP:GAN
  , etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—

WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Criminal cast main.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox360 museum

Hi i'm making a file (ITALIAN language for now) with ALL related to xbox 360.

it's an excel file created with openoffice.

i'm actually hosting it here, if you need it for the xboxproject, take it!

http://www.xbox360museum.com/stiva/XBOX360%20museum%20DATABASE%20-%20RETAIL.ods

i'm working very hard to complete this file. i'm on it since one week. completed games 0-9# and A.

i also wish to help with your wiki project, but i'm new to wiki editing so i'm a bit noob, if you want to explain a little bit just write me^^

bye! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassetto (talk • contribs) 10:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Criminal cast main.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BS- CF.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:P1280311.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Replaceable fair use File:BS - Sarah.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BS - Sarah.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 00:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Holly 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Holly 1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 00:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BS - Julia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BS - Julia.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 00:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holly 1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Stefan2 (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!