User talk:DMacks/Archive 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Archive 30 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 40

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

This Month in Education: December 2017

This Month in Education

Volume 6 | Issue 11 | December 2017

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


From the Community

Wikimedia Serbia has established cooperation with three new faculties within the Education Program

Updates to Programs & Events Dashboard

Wiki Camp Berovo 2017

WM User Group Greece organises Wikipedia e-School for Educators

Corfupedia records local history and inspires similar projects

Wikipedia learning lab at TUMO Stepanakert

Wikimedia CH experiments a Wikipedia's treasure hunt during "Media in Piazza"

From the Education Team

Creating digitally minded educators at BETT 2017

In the News

Things My Professor Never Told Me About Wikipedia

"Academia and Wikipedia: Critical Perspectives in Education and Research" Conference in Ireland

Science is shaped by Wikipedia

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 19:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

My sincerest congratulations to you and EdChem for this very enjoyable read, which I have reviewed and put a nice green plus sticker on. ^_^ Double sharp (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

12 years of editing

Hey, DMacks. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation options

I cannot find it, but a few weeks ago you had suggested something like a "rich-disambiguation" page which would include the various topics that are being disambiguated as well as some actual information, concisely state. Can you leave the link to that WP instruction? Thank you, --Smokefoot (talk) 23:06, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:SETINDEX? DMacks (talk
) 04:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

23:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: January 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 7 | Issue 1 | January 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue


Featured Topic

Bertsomate: using Basque oral poetry to illustrate math concepts

From the Community

Wikimedia Serbia celebrated 10 years from the first article written within the Education Program

WikiChallenge Ecoles d'Afrique update

The first Swedish Master's in Digital Humanities partners with Wikimedia Sverige

How we use PetScan to improve partnership with lecturers and professors


From the Education Team

The Education Survey Report is out!

Education Extension scheduled shutdown

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 18:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Peabody Bookplate

Re: Peabody Bookplate File:Peabody book plate.jpg Hello DMacks,

In answer to your question, no, I did not create the original art. I really cannot verify if there is, or isn't, a copyright involved, since the bookshop closed down in 1987. The owners of the shop, Siegfried Weisberger died in 1984, and Rose Hayes in 1986.

Even though there isn't a copyright or trademark symbol on the plate, I wasn't confident enough about this being un-copyrighted that I didn't include it on Peabody_Bookshop_and_Beer_Stube, hoping wiser people, like you, could provide counsel.

Thanks for keeping it honest, Keithba (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2018

Wikipedia Education globe
Wikipedia Education globe
This Month in Education

Volume 7 | Issue 2 | February 2018

This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!

In This Issue
From the Community

WikiProject Engineering Workshop at IIUC,Chittagong

What did we learn from Wikibridges MOOC?

Wikimedia Serbia launched Wiki scholar project

Wiki Club in Ohrid, Macedonia

Karvachar’s WikiClub: When getting knowledge is cool

More than 30 new courses launched in the University of the Basque Country

Review meeting on Christ Wikipedia Education Program

The Multidisciplinary Choices of High School Students: The Arabic Education Program; Wikimedia Israel

From the Education Team

The Education Extension is being deprecated (second call)

The 2017 survey report live presentation is available for viewing

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · For the team: Romaine 08:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I had reverted obvious vandalism back to the pre-anon-edited version. Why did you revert me? 193.52.24.8 (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Ah yikes, yes. I misread the history. So many IPs, making so many edits against each other:( DMacks (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Followup/discussion

"Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked "

Please note that I am an active, known researcher and am not doing anything promotional, but adding bone fide references and research. I'd appreciate undoing your deletes. Respectfully, Prof. Moshe Sipper — Preceding unsigned comment added by R1D1 (talkcontribs) 21:34, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

By placing your own refs in so many places, the appearance and effect of your edits is to promote your own work. Even if only
WP:REFSPAM, but still you likely have a variety of sources at hand and can easily find some by others too. DMacks (talk
) 21:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your note

Please note that I am an active researcher and have added bone fide links and references. I'd appreciate undoing the deletes. Thank you very much, Prof Moshe Sipper

R1D1 (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

By placing your own refs in so many places, the appearance and effect of your edits is to promote your own work. Even if only WP:SELFCITE and not be literal WP:REFSPAM, but still you likely have a variety of sources at hand and can easily find some by others too. DMacks (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Possibly, but I've only made small additions, single sentences and single refs in a number of entries. Seems helpful, not harmful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R1D1 (talkcontribs) 21:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Wasn't it over 20 or so? That's pretty heavy reliance on a single source. Feel free to get further input from one of the WikiProjects relevant to the subject. They might be better-positioned to decide on the relevance of your content (with self-ref) and loose ref additions to bibliographies. DMacks (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm a Wiki novice, have no idea what WikiProjects is. I thought these were helpful minor additions. I've neither the time nor the inclination to fight over this. My research is cited and available enough outside Wikipedia, guess that'll have to do. Disappointing but thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R1D1 (talkcontribs) 21:55, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Chemical storage

I note your revert of my disambiguation on Chemical storage. Can you say what Base should point to if not Base (chemistry) in this case and what would be a better link than Reactive to Reactivity (chemistry)? I was looking for flamable for ignitable but would welcome your corrections. You said "And now you have added content that is both *bad as content* and contains broken cites" and yet I have never edited this article before. I don't understand.— Rod talk 22:05, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your disamgibuation fixes are actually correct. But the content you corrected was problematic overall, so I removed it altogether. Unfortunately, the wikimedia software that flags undone/reverted edits does not recognize that sort of situation--I guess it only sees "edit was undone", not "...back to an even earlier edition". The full edit history of the article with my edit summary is more explicit that I was jumping back several revisions, not just undoing yours itself. Sorry if I came across poorly towards you in the edit-summary. My frustration (and specific details) were aimed at USer:Bamrsykp, whose edit I was actually undoing, and who has been making many problematic edits there recently. DMacks (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
OK Thanks. — Rod talk 22:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your message re COI

Hi DMacks. Thanks for your guidance on my talk page. It's noted and appreciated as I try to get up to speed with how best to contribute here. I did make some minor edits to an article regarding my employer, OpenText, as well as some updates to articles relating to companies they have recently acquired (primarily URL updates). I don't see a way to retrospectively note my association to OpenText (if there is a way and you wouldn't mind guiding me, I'd appreciate it?) but in future will add these as suggestions in the talk page and hopefully someone else will validate and then make the updates. The updates really were for the benefit of accuracy (e.g. old company URLs retired) and not intended to be any form of abuse or conflict of interest. I'm working on some updates to articles that are in my interest area, will focus my attention there since no risk of conflict :-)

Thanks Jhawden (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Dear there

Kindly let me know the reason of block my ip and my Wiki accounts. Shaban110 (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Dear there

Kindly let me know the reason of block my ip and my Wiki accounts. Shaban110 (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

IP block

Dear DMacks Greetings

Kindly let me know why my ip and user names blocked whenever i try to post my article to Wikipedia,. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaban110 (talkcontribs) 05:00, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Which IP block are you talking about? I have made several in my time here, and they each might have different reasons. The actual block message and notes on the talkpage of your account(s) might be something you should read. As a start, it is against policy to simply create a new account when an old one gets blocked...the new one will just get blocked solely for
WP:SOCK. You will need to use your original account to get to the botttom of the situation. DMacks (talk
) 05:09, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

request to remove foul language

in a heated debate, i used foul language on the page of user Jonathan A Jones. Can you please remove it permanently and from the edit summary? Thanks https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jonathan_A_Jones&oldid=831265056 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swandancelake (talkcontribs) 18:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

As you state in your revision, 16 is the number of available orbitals, but this has nothing to do with the bonds that can effectively be created. (As far as f-block atoms are concerned, f-orbitals are buried in the inner core of the atom and thus they are unavailable to interaction with the chemical environment.) As stated in the same section, the "number of possible bonds is the coordination number", and for coordination compounds this can reach 12 in lanthanoids (as quoted e. g. in Greenwood and Earnshaw, Chemistry of the elements, but also in any inorganic chemistry textbook). Regards, Albris (talk) 13:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:PRIMARY. But the article bdiscusses multiple complexes (including polymers) with coordination numbers 14 as if it is a fairly non-controversial idea. That article then states "No complex of any kind, however, has been definitively shown to adopt a Werner coordination number higher than 14" (multiply cited, including one of an uncertain/disputed case of 15). DMacks (talk
) 15:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the reference on the 15-coordinate complex. This information could be added profitably into the "coordination number" page, but in my opinion it is misleading for the "coordination polymer" page (and thorium aminodiboranate is not a polymer). Anyway, I see that you have modified the text, and now it is much better. I added a citation where needed. Regards, Albris (talk) 16:08, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
I agree that the 15-coordinate thorium complex is off-topic for the polymers page, but that article discusses 14-coordinate cases that are. That's why I only gave 14 not 15 as the limit in the polymers page. Adding more to the coordination-number page is on my TODO list (already worked on the uranium borohydride page). DMacks (talk) 16:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Please pass the salt

I think that MN Park needs a bit of seasoning. The creator has repeatedly created substantially the same thing with the same problems multiple times. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

 Done. Odd that the more I salt, the more my wiki blood pressure goes down. DMacks (talk) 08:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

"...Unconstructive edits..."

Hello DMacks, you have removed my edit to RPA page (August 2017) and mentioned as ...unconstructive edits... I am not sure what makes the edit qualify for that. Please refer: https://www.workfusion.com/ It is mentioned as one of the RPA tools, and hence I included it in the RPA tools section of the page.

warm regards, chandra Chandrashekhara h (talk) 09:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Articles with lists of examples are generally for lists of articles, as a way of demonstrating that the entries are worthy of inclusion. Wikipedia is not for "everything" but only for what independent sources demonstrate is "notable". You added one or more "redlinks", which means there was no evidence the entry had reached that level. See
WP:WTAF for an essay about this idea. DMacks (talk
) 02:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Thank you very much for your time, reminder, and guide.

Amir.azhieh

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amir.azhieh (talkcontribs) 16:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)