User talk:DaveK@BTC

This user is a member of Wikiproject Gymnastics.

This user is a recent changes patroller.

Hello and

Why do you keep deleting the link to essexweekly, i really like this site and the information that it gives about essex. What is the point of deleting the link. Are you deleting because you have some commercial interest in the other links which as for commercial sites. Perhaps they should be deleted from the links area ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newchauncey (talk • contribs) 10:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• To sign your posts (on
  talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). I noticed that you did not do this on Trampoline
  recently which is why I am here.
• Try the
  test area
  .
• If you need
  help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore,
  be bold in editing pages
  , and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! Dabbler 14:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed my message because I didn't see exactly what you had done only looking back one revision. Dabbler 13:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dabbler - sorry about that, sod's law as soon as I saved my main edit I noted a minor typo.

(Answered on my talk page) DarkSaber2k 09:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits or discussions show that you may be interested in the new

OK, now I know what the wording was meant to say, I've made it a bit stronger. I thought it meant "walrus skins on slippery things could be kind of trampolines", rather than "The Inuit might have tossed people in the air in a style similar to trampolining". Graham87 15:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message at my talkpage. Yes, although a couple of lines of salient information could be quoted (with appropriate speech marks, etc.) the bulk of a copy and paste should be substituted by a link to the website. The content might be rewritten, and a link provided, but it would be difficult to sidestep plagiarism. I trust this helps. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that none of the edits I made have been copied and pasted from the parish council website, although I am aware that some of the content is similar. The additions I made to the west bergholt page were done from notes I made on the history of WB some years ago when I used to perform guided tours of the village, before conducting my masters in history. In light of things, I'd recommend that you use quotation marks around the concerned areas; having various external links about the place makes the page look extremely messy. Information that looks factually correct, will inevitably look similar to that of the parish site.

Also, if any of the photos are of concern to you, they are all my own work.

My view is that the page looks substantially better that it did before, which read more as a tourist guide to the Old Church. I just have a great deal of pride for my home village and wanted to make people more aware of our fantastic heritage. At the end of the day - what harm has it done? Sleeper141 (talk) 10:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am very well aware of the local history society, having been a member for years. In fact, the majority of my research has been carried out through them - including the publication entitled "Enclosure Award & Map 1865" as well as numerous others. The reason for lack of reference to this was due to time (as well as the internet going down before I had chance to save my work last time I entered references), as I have been rather busy of late and was planning on getting round to it at due course - so give me a few days and I'll have it sorted out. To be honest, I'm surprised that you're not pleased that someone has taken the time to compile the village history in a readily accessible place. I guess in future I’ll think twice. Sleeper141 (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I take it that this is the image in question; you are being requested under what license this is being released under - if it under the GFDL, or whether there needs to be an attribution to the original owner of any copyright (this being the subjects son) and confirming you have permission to release the image. I think the help desk you mentioned is best able to help you. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen

I found this link which seems to have the complete list. I will look into adding the others over the next little time. Dabbler (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message to my talkpage. Generally, treat spammers like any other vandal; warn them through templates and report them to AIV after the final warning. There are specific warning templates for spamming to be found at

I did wonder whether it was you having a brainstorm but although the addition did look OK, the close approximation to your name made me wonder a bit. I also knew that if it was you then retrieving the edit would be easy and nothing was lost. Dabbler (talk) 22:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I used the revert in popups & only caught the second ip edit (and yours). Apologies for the mistake --Nate1481 14:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for re-wording that bit about Autumn. I knew it wasn't quite right and was struggling to find a better way of putting it: your rephrase has done the job. Regards Dom Kaos (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DaveK@BTC. You have new messages at Verbal's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. You recently reverted a change of mine to Richmond. On reflection I agree with your reversion, but I don't think it goes far enough. The reverted article now still tries to tell the story of the name, but tells it badly. As other editors are involved, I've created an attempt to gain a consensus at Talk:Richmond#Format of page. You may wish to contribute. -- Starbois (talk) 11:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave
I've been looking for the 450th anniversary date, that you have referred to, on the school web-site, but can't find it - can you point me to where it is?

However, the website does say the school was "Founded 451 years ago" [1] which concurs with 1558.

My info came from "Historical Notes" - pages 2 & 3 of the "Blue Book" that pupils were issued with each year (from 1968-1975 at least). This gives an exact date of 5 July 1558 for when Queen Mary granted Antony Browne his licence to found the school. This is a very specific date, and was repeated for many years - although I know that doesn't make it right.
Arjayay (talk) 17:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave
Thanks for your message
The "Founded 451 years ago" may be a non-updated reference, as you suggest - alternatively Griff (or Jonathan Ruffle who wrote the script) may have made a mistake. However, as stated above, 1557 contradicts the printed statement issued by the school for many years. Currently the Wiki article is self-contradictory, giving two dates. I think we need an "official" clarification.
Arjayay (talk) 07:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave
Have e-mailed the question to the school - although this is hardly a high priority item for them to respond to - whilst "original research" is, of course, banned by Wikipedia
Arjayay (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have had a reply from the School

"You are quite right. There is confusion about the year of foundation of the school. The school celebrated its 350th Anniversary in 1907 and its 400th Anniversary in 1957. We therefore took the view that the 450th Anniversary should be celebrated in 2007. Queen Mary certainly granted Antony Browne his licence to found the school in 1558 so, strictly speaking, the year of foundation of the school is 1558."

Will alter article accordingly and copy this e-mail to talk page
Arjayay (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The category has the description Ancient counties that did not go on to form one of the non-metropolitan counties of England. Essex was the odd one out of those I found in there. I hope to add categories to all county articles giving the date of establishment. However, I am holding off doing the ancient counties as I am not sure if Category:Counties of England established before 1889, Category:Counties of England established in antiquity or Category:Counties of England established in x century is the best option. What do you think? MRSC (talk) 22:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ted Blake 27-08-88 Switzerland.JPEG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 21:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1964 First World TTrampoline Championships London.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 04:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Not sure if you are still active n Wikipedia but if you see this, I would appreciate it if you could make some comments. Please see this request for page protection re Vuly Trampolines and provide your two cents there,. Thanks. Dabbler (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]