User talk:Starbois

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Archives


Luisenstädtischer Canal

Hi, the current title

Luisenstädtischer Canal looks a bit strange to me. I would suggest either the German name "Luisenstädtischer Kanal", or the fully translated "Luisenstadt Canal". The later form seems to be used in English, see Google Books. Markussep Talk 13:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Good point, will do. I've copied your comment and more detail response to Talk:Luisenstadt Canal so the reasoning is available to subsequent editors. -- Starbois (talk) 13:26, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the same goes for

Nausdorfer Canal. Markussep Talk 13:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

A barnstar for you!

The
Good Article
Barnstar
Thanks Starbois for helping to promote
give someone a pat on the back today. Sp33dyphil ©© 08:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Starbois! The

WMF
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Bypassing redirects

Hi, there is generally no need to bypass redirects, as you did here and several other places. Please see

WP:NOTBROKEN for why. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.

I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

A tag has been placed on Glattalbahn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Stadtbahn Glattal will be moved here. The original Article has already been moved to Glattalbahn (disambiguation).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Saippuakauppias 13:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article River Link is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River Link until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Clear Fork Royalty LLC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is a non-notable business, page is promotional. Was moved from an entirely unrelated disambiguation page to this page to avoid scrutiny.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paisarepa 01:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion
.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Saltburn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 9 § Saltburn until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Glattalbahn (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (

WP:ONEOTHER
). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]