User talk:DeadEyeArrow
This user may have left Wikipedia. DeadEyeArrow has not edited Wikipedia since December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| ||||||||||||
Decline of DeletionDeletion of a page because it was NOT IN ENGLISH, and has no relevant reason to not be in English, such as organization made mainly of Mexicans or a Language icon indicating you speak Spanish - in this case, that did not apply. It seems the deletion box, however, did not make my reason of NOT IN ENGLISH show up. So I don't know whether or not this "decline" was done with the knowledge of my reason or without it. Also, if you "declined" all by yourself, I assume you are an administrator. ~ Rayvn (talk) 22:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Reporting Vandalism Template?Hi, do you know a template for quickly reporting vandalism? Greg Comlish (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
This is a school district ip address i actually do attend high school in the district i would like to make a suggesting to permanently blocking this ip address because all 99.9% of the edits made from this is vandalism and i believe that no mater what it will continue.I think it would be better if people were forced to make a account in order to edit articles. Thanks Talk♂ 16:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC) ]
Anonymous User 72.241.101.20Hi DEA - On 31 March, you issued a gentle warning (more in the nature of a friendly reminder) to anonymous user 72.241.101.20. However, I note that 72.241.101.20 has now deleted your comments from his/her user/discussion page, and also deleted comments he didn't like from Zagalejo (who apparently later restored his comments, overriding 72.241.101.20's deletion). Just thought you should know that your comments have been deleted by the anonymous user. It's a bit silly, really, because the history is there, plain for all to see, and nobody is attacking 72.241.101.20 - in fact, he/she has made some good edits in the recent past, but occasionally gone a bit too far with several edits or deletions. It appears that he/she is a new contributor, so I don't believe there is any ill-will involved - just some need for him/her to have a better understanding of Wikipedia's processes. Cheers from New Zealand,--Georgette.mccallum (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC) Hey Doug(moved here from What's with this: Here? --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 15:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Help!Yo DEA I need your help with user Scetoaux. --InvisibleDiplomat666 22:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Your Help is NeededCurrently, there is a dispute going on at ]
|
|
Regarding your tag "needs citations" on Figaro Systems
Hello - I am the creator of that article. I cited 19 sources; 11 are articles about the company or its technology from US newspapers, trade or other journals, or other neutral and independent sources. The remainder of the citations are to the company's official website. Please suggest how to improve this article. Thanks, Leoniana (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- The other citations are okay, but ultimately the ones that are from the website aren't appropriate for Wikipedia, particularly the ones in the venues, awards and products section. They need to be replaced with ]
Hello again - I have improved the article with additional reliable third-party sources, and done general cleanup of the refs. Have a look. Leoniana (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikiproject Software invite
Thanks for that. It's difficult to know where it should go; the song, the album or the film, so I hope you'll forgive my confusion. Arguably it should go to a DAB page but then since it's all Beatles, who can say what the target should be, with appropriate hatnotes? Next time I may well look at the page hits to see where most readers are actually going. --Rodhullandemu 23:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I used your redirect barnstar
Thanks for creating it! :) I just awarded it to two editors that have done a lot of work with a list of redirects --Enric Naval (talk) 00:47, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, I been meaning to move it to the template space and add it to ]
- You should probably do it. There is already a Template Barnstar and a Categorisation Barnstar, after all :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want me to make for you the work to move the barnstar to wikipedia space and list it at WP:BARN? I just can't stand seeing the poor thing not on the same standing as the rest of barnstars :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, yeah you can go ahead and move it. I never did cause I just don't like the image. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 02:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, the image can always be replaced with a better one. What I like is the existance of a barnstar to reward good contributions to the redirects are. I'm gonna move it now. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:42, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, yeah you can go ahead and move it. I never did cause I just don't like the image. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 02:41, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want me to make for you the work to move the barnstar to wikipedia space and list it at WP:BARN? I just can't stand seeing the poor thing not on the same standing as the rest of barnstars :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- You should probably do it. There is already a Template Barnstar and a Categorisation Barnstar, after all :) --Enric Naval (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Bitin'
Howdy! I saw the stern warning you left for the anon user who deleted AN/I. It's a high profile page, sure, but based on his edit history, it could have just been an accident. There's no history of vandalism, so please be careful to avoid accidentally
- I take it back, I guess it was an IP jumping vandal. Mea culpa. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's okay, it could have easily turned out that I slighted an anon but I did think it was pretty suspicious. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 04:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Facepalm
- And again, it's no big deal, shit happens. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 07:35, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Help check it out
Could you maybe help out on these page with displaying references in is own section; tidy it up a bit
Thank You Thank you Thank You for fixing up this page. The last time I made a page was List of Best Selling Remix albums. Things were diffrent a year and a half ago lol. Sorry if i made a mess for asking for a lot of help I knew the page was a dozze.
music honorifics
Just caught your inuse tag. I made five or six edits before seeing it. I'll stay out of the page for a bit, but I removed lead refs after a number of female singers at the end of the article (everyone with their name now formatted with a sub-header). Sorry about that. The editor who created the page appears to have spam requested help with the page, which created a bit of a mess. Hiberniantears (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Oops
It looks like I accidentally removed a post of your in AN/I while removing a resolved complaint, but the other user fixed it. Jut wanted to et you know that it wasn't intended. Everything is fine. Nothing to see here. :) - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Jelena Spiric page
Hi there,
I have deleted Jelena Spiric user page last night and tonight again on her wish, and you brought it back..Please contact her at [email protected] if you don't believe me..I'm the one who created it in the first place.
Sasa —Preceding unsigned comment added by NEbasketball (talk • contribs) 02:17, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Al-kitab(Quran) deletion
without discussing on talk page the article was deleted is this wikkipedea policy? does wikkipedea not consider the Qurani ayats refrences as reliable source for an article of Quran? if so, then wikkipeadea is nopropagating truth but people hiersay about Quran. thanks ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farrukh38 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- It was deleted through an primary source, which means any claims made with it need to be verified with other sources. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 20:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)]
Happy First Edit Day!
- Yup, three years. /me goes back to feeling old. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 21:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
101 Philosophy
Try improving it, not vandalising it ...
Docmartincohen (talk) 19:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- The sum of my actions on that page amount to one pagemove and one proposed deletion and I haven't edited that page in a couple days, so please don't come here accusing me of vandalism. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 19:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!!
Thanks for the support!!! Check it Out
RfB Thank You spam
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |
Faculty of pharmacy-ain shams university
Dear DeadEyeArrow I recreated
72.204.224.77
Thanks for the alert. The articles are outside his normal range so I hadn't noticed. FYI, the banned user is Harvardlaw (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). If you ever see a similar pattern of edits by any other accounts please let me know. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Ten-string guitar
Please, if this is such an issue, then YOU please fix it so the move of Andrewa is undone to the correct, previous location of the article. I do not have time to follow your red tape beurocracy to correct my own article every single time it is butchered by some idiot. This is OBVIOUSLY misspelt. In English we hyphenate terms like 10-string, six-string, etc. The move is simply ignorant. The article was fine the way it was. PLUS, Andrewa introduces redundant information. A baroque guitar is a FIVE-COURSE guitar, not a '10-string guitar'. A "course" being a pair of strings that act as ONE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.133.166 (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Disruptive user returns
Please take a look at Bigelarkin12 (talk · contribs) - most recent is [1]. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 02:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, left them a message, will keep a lookout. —[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 09:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
FYI, please see [2]. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 20:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
AFD
I have requested clarification here. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 18:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Barry Callebaut
Hey, i recently passed by the Barry Callebaut article and noticed that it read like a publicity brochure. Edit history shows that IP 217.193.137.163 reduced the article to the basic company blurb a while ago; looks like you fixed it once, but then they re-edited it again shortly after and removed a lot of the info that was there. The IP in question belongs to the company's HQ.
I spent some time trying to fix it up and give it a bit more structure, but I'm not sure how succesful I was in doing so. I'm not a native english speaker, and I'm not entirely NPOV on the topic myself since I work for a supplier of theirs. I was hoping you (as the last intelligent neutral editor to the article) could have another look.
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.133.166.46 (talk) 00:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Sethu Institute of Technology removed
Hello
I was searching to see if there is something new about my alma mater and discovered that there is no such page. When I wanted to start an article, it find that there had been a page but had been deleted some time ago. Why is that? It does tell us about Blatant Copyright infringement.....can't understand how some one can do that to a page about an engineering college.
Can I go ahead and start a new page? Or can you let me know what was so wrong about the page?
Jsshenba (talk) 09:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC) Moorthi
My RfA
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC) |
I just saw this randomly as I was searching something my friend said.
February 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mininova, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 20:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
My concern is that I've never made any changes to Wikipedia, ever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.142.249 (talk) 00:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Pwease?
I found an uberful message on Mandarax's talk page that you left (This one) and was wondering if you'd let me use the
- "In thanks for fixing the vandalism/blanking/attack on one/some/all of my userpages I reward you this bootleg CD of your favorite band/musician."
thing. I'd of course replace a bit of it (mostly the part referring to the userpages) but otherwise it would remain the same... So? Moocowsrule (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule
- Yea you can use it, no problem. --[DeadEyeArrow – Talk – Contribs] 06:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Moocowsrule (talk) 04:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)moocowsrule
Happy first edit day!
hi, I nominated Ergogenic aid for speedy deletion.
Best wishes,Rich (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey Deadeyearrow
A long time ago you helped me on List of Honorific titles, Can you give your opinion on it on this. page .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_honorific_titles_in_popular_music_(2nd_nomination)
Hi, I wanted to move this article with a new name, Fortifications of Québec National Historic Site, because that is the official Parks Canada name. Since you created the article and made many edits, I wanted to make sure that was OK. Jllm06 (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day (2010)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kidneythieves-Trickster.jpg
Orphaned non-free image File:Suspiria (album).jpg
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Orphaned non-free image File:Metatron (album).jpg
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Thirdmoon
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
A tag has been placed on
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ReformedArsenal (talk) 21:08, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Thirdmoon for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirdmoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:TypeONegative-ChristianWoman.ogg)
Thanks for uploading
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a
](delivered by mabdul 23:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC))
Hello. I am looking through the articles which have been tagged for notability for 5 years, and came across this, which you nominated for speedy deletion. It was removed. If you still feel it should be deleted, you might want to consider taking it to prod or AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
"Tungston" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Vargaresa – The Beginning
The article
Appears to fail
WP:NALBUM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)