User talk:Deerlover567

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Mick Harte Was Here constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Caltas ^(talk) 20:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer: The Movie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 13:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mick Harte Was Here has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced non-notable novel

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Σ _☭^★ 19:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There's a merger proposal relating to an article or articles you've contributed to, relating to the Ramona Quimby books. You are invited to read about and discuss it here: Talk:Ramona (novel series)#Merger Proposal. Thank you. Tlqk56 (talk) 23:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Nuts and Caocao

The Twits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Worms

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ed, Edd n Eddy's Boo Haw Haw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Pit

Pippi Longstocking (book) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to

Redhead

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Lopez (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Doctor

List of George Lopez characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Injections

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Drake & Josh characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Christmas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Deerlover567. You might have noticed that I reverted your edits to

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fred Figglehorn. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 03:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Shy Little Kitten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Arthur's Nose, Deerlover567!

Wikipedia editor Danielj27052705 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Citations will need to be added to avoid deletion but it is a promising article with potential.

To reply, leave a comment on Danielj27052705's talk page.

Learn more about

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phineas and Ferb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You've made a large number of edits that completely rewrite existing summaries (of plots or characters) - eg1, eg2 - often deleting referenced-information and vital wikilinks in the process. Please be more careful when editing existing content, to preserve the useful information that editors have added. Thank you. –Quiddity (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from pages without discussing it first. I understand that you are doing this in good faith, but such drastic edits should not be made based on one editor opinion. At the very least, provide an edit summary in which you explain why you are cutting the information down. JDDJS (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Then Again, Maybe I Won't, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Am Weasel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trailer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Freckle Juice. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. I came across your page because I was...very confused by your edits to Freckle Juice - the language was incoherent, and several facts about the story were incorrect. I notice, reading over your talk page, that this has been a *frequent* issue for you. The page is not a major one; the edits were there for several months. However, I am escalating this to a level 3 warning, because this seems to have been going on for years. Please start doing edits in the sandbox, and feel free to consult an admin or experienced editor for advice before taking your work live. I will be checking in on you to see how you progress. Thespian (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding History of edits. The thread is "User:Deerlover567 has made a substantial and ongoing set of incoherent edits". Thank you. Thespian (talk) 06:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Diary of a Wimpy Kid characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairly OddPet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 08:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current