User talk:Devon2k22

Hi Devon2k22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pandarikulam Sri Muththumari Amman Kovil. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 04:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Losliya Mariyanesan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Losliya Mariyanesan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Abhirami Venkatachalam. Thanks! Usedtobecool ^✉ ✨ 13:09, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Rowdy Baby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NSONG

. YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source. All other references are mentions in passing or relate to the movie not the song.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Direction Temples has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:19, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pandarikulam Sri Muththumari Amman Kovil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NGEO

, lacks any reliable independent secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 15:54, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ukkulankulam Sivan Kovil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:NGEO

. Facebook is not an acceptable source. Lacks any reliable independent secysources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ukkulankulam Sivan Kovil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukkulankulam Sivan Kovil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 09:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Devon2k22. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]