User talk:Dexcel

Hi, I'm trying to start some sort of working group to improve the coverage of Central Asia and related topics in Wikipedia. Leave a message on my userpage if you're interested. Aelfthrytha 03:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As someone plugged into the Energy Portal, you might be interested to know that I've made a request for a portal peer review today - perhaps you might like to contribute your thoughts? If you haven't stopped by the Energy portal recently, you'll see that it's now looking rather different too! Gralo 18:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Philbentley. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under

Hello Philbentley, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

Hi Philbentley. I also think that the box is very good start. Certainly it's not too technical. Concerning including physcial properties, I think it would be ok, although it could be probably work to find this information about all oil fields added to Wikipedia. Beagel 19:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phil, the oil field box is indeed a good start. However, we should probably make a template that makes it much easier to enter all the data. If data is missing, the box won't look bad. Also, we should be consistent with other infoboxes throughout Wikipedia. Check out this category:

Template:Infobox Oil field. Kgrr 14:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I've made a start:

bogus
caption to image
Country	Saudi Arabia
Location/block	123/ABC
Offshore/onshore	onshore
Operators	Aramco
Partners	Shell
Field history
Discovery	1948
Start of production	1951
Abandonment	2012
Production
Producing formations	Jurassic Park

Kgrr 01:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Phil. Thank you for the link and your contributions.Beagel 15:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My intention is to go after peer review for GA and then for FA. I agree that this article is growing too long (and also too large by its size) and I think that probably there could be separate article on Oil shale industry. In this case, all current industry, economics and environment sections will be moved to the new article and article on oil shale will include geology and reserves sections and only short industry overview. However, I think it's better to keep right now all information together and make separation only after peer review or even after GA review. What you think? Beagel 17:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I listed

Environmental effects of oil shale industry) for the peer review.Beagel 17:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your assistance improving the

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miranda Grell

Hello Phil; I notice your chnge to the entry on Miranda Grell. Are you able to provide a source that says she no longer works for Nicky Gavron? Thanks Ned de Rotelande 08:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC) Many thanks for your response. Ned de Rotelande 10:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

New sections of the Energy Portal

Hi and a Happy New Year! I created new sections of the Energy Portal for new articles (found by bot) and for announcements (nominations for good and featured articles, peer and expert reviews, deletion and merging discussions etc). You are welcome to add your announcements there and also share your thoughts how to improve and further update this portal. Beagel (talk) 18:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oil shale industry

Hi, Phil. I Think you would like to knew that listed the

WP:GAN.Beagel (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oil shale

Hi, Phil. I nominated the

WP:FAC.Beagel (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BG Group.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gr1st (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oil shale extraction

Hi, Phil. I am going to nominate the

WP:FAC. Maybe you would like to take a look before starting this process? Thank you in advance.Beagel (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. I nominated the

Oil shale extraction for FAC. Beagel (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oil shale geology

Hi. I nominated the

GAN. You are welcome to comment and improve this article. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oil shale extraction

Hi, Phil. I am planning to renominate the

Oil shale extraction article for FAC. Of course, this article is not ready for renomination yet, but I am planning to concentrate on this in coming months. You have done an excellent work on improving oil-shale related articles and I hope you will have a time to assist also with this article. Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Phil. The article is almost there. It still needs some fresh views, reviewing and final copyediting, but otherwise it is probably ready for the FAC renomination. I think this is the stage where your assistance would be most valuable. Please share your views what you think about the current stage and perspectives of this article, and how to organize the further work with that. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oilfield infoboxes

Hi, Phil. I just proposed to merge

here. Beagel (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Uko_Masing

nice

talk) 20:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

File source problem with File:Gama Ray Log.GIF

Thank you for uploading File:Gama Ray Log.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page

. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated,

talk) 01:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dexcel. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]