User talk:Dominic3203

Hello Dominic3203,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Chinese to English Wikipedia?

This would involve evaluating a translated article on the English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Chinese article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Chinese , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Chinese. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

• Liu Huixian
• Lu Rongting
• Ma Shilong

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Chinese article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that the math formatting displayed differently than I'm used to seeing. I thought that some of the math problem was deleted, which is why I reverted the edit. Please accept my apologies for causing confusion with the revert that I made... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:05, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've redacted the IP address from the previous edit you made to the article, as you indicated that you accidentally edited while logged out ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese mathematics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Set (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Object (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Trianglar numbers