User talk:Dustinclendenen

Thank you for

I have deleted the article, as it does not conform to the requirements in

talk) 06:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Dustinclendenen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 18:16, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note - actually at

Hueman. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this article to draftspace so that you can develop it. You can edit it at Draft:Kurt Iswarienko. Please do not move it into mainspace until it has some content with inline citations to reliable sources. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Kurt Iswarienko. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

And please review

Hi Espresso Addict, I have been in communication with Ronz. After you moved this to Draftspace I had heavily modified text so there could be no construed promotion, and heavily cited all information. But the update was removed again. I tried to move this back to Draft space to work on more but it is not letting me, saying that there is already a Draft there. However, when I follow the link to Draft:Kurt Iswarienko from your above message it just takes me here. How would you recommend best proceeding? Would it be possible to review the update that was made several days ago? Or could I just start this whole process over from scratch? Thank you so much for your help. -- Dustinclendenen (talk) 21:16, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dustinclendenen. Could you please respond to the concerns above?

To make progress with Kurt Iswarienko, I highly recommend you work with very small edits, adding no more than one source at at time, with clear edit summaries. I'm happy to help review your edits, but we're restrained by

Hi Ronz Apologies for delayed response. In the update that I just made to this page that has since been removed, the article was heavily reformatted to list nothing but facts or sourced information, with everything cited. I didn't realize I had to respond—I thought I just had to make appropriate changes. Is it possible to review the edit that was made last night to make sure it conforms to guidelines? And if so, to restore that edit? Thank you. Dustinclendenen (talk) 21:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding.

I will look over everything, but there are 22 references to review, which will take time. Glancing at the information about the references in the article, I'm guessing most are unreliable, poor, or otherwise inappropriate; as was the case with the previous versions.

It's also necessity to ensure

notability criteria

has been met to ensure that the article isn't deleted outright. You might want to focus on that first.

Another option is to move it back to draft space (or ask for it to be done), then ask for formal reviews. --

talk) 22:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for responding so quickly. I think the number of original citations is actually half that, because I used some of the citations twice to cite both Iswarienko's photographing of a celebrity, and the fact that it was published in a particular magazine. It's not letting me move to draft for some reason. Dustinclendenen (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's a draft page there already, which may be the problem. I rarely move articles, so it would be best to get help from someone else for the move. --

talk) 03:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I will work on that existing Draft and submit that for review. Thank you! -- Dustinclendenen (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronz, someone has moved Kurt Iswarienko back to Draft:Kurt Iswarienko. I have made some changes and it is ready for review. Please advise. Thank you for your help. Dustinclendenen (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dustinclendenen. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dustinclendenen. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dustinclendenen|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many of the sources are not

significant coverage

, not just in passing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kurt Iswarienko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:09, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kurt Iswarienko, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, Dustinclendenen. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Secret Walls, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Dustinclendenen, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dustinclendenen|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Captain Calm (talk) 10:06, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article James Peter Henry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication here that this person might meet

WP:NARTIST

. No mention of any major or museum show, sourced mainly to a couple of "interviews" (obvious PR, note the similarities between them)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]