This is my talkpage, so I would like to set down a few general rules and guidelines. Mainly, it would be great if all could try to use correct grammar and spelling unless inventing a new word or something. Actually, that's all for now … By the way, I guess I should sign here, but there is no reason to link to my own talkpage here, so I won't.

User talk:Elium2 continued

Hello, and welcometo wikipedia! Thanks for your edit to the page on

I have nominated Category:Elium2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 01:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elium2, I just wanted to let you know that you can continue to keep track of pages in your userspace using the Special:PrefixIndex function; for example, Special:PrefixIndex/User:Elium2. Cheers, –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 05:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Black Falcon. Is it really necessary for me to sign? Elium2 (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. To sign what? –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 00:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My post. Elium2 (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, essentially. It's not a problem if you occasionally forget to sign, but it is good practice (see Wikipedia:Signatures) to sign your posts so that other editors can easily identify with whom they are conversing. Cheers, –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 02:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Am I allowed to post userboxes describing me, but not made by me (currently at User:Elium2/Userboxes_Describing_User_Elium2), directly on my userpage? If not, is there some way to quickly copy the categories the userboxes put me, as a user, in? Thanks for any answers. User:Elium2 13:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see why you couldn't. There are many wikipedians who have userboxes not made by them on their userpages (including me!). I have actually read all your userboxes on that said page, and personally, I would keep it seperate for the fun of seeing who reads them all. Anyway, hope this helps. Mr little irish^(talk) 11:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. User:Elium2 19:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm amazed you took the time to read all of those! I have like a hundred! User:Elium2 13:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Elium2.

talk!) 12:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

On

death sentence might not be overturned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foster v. Chatman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Foster v. Chatman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elium2. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elium2. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elium2. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elium2. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the article in earwig, and I see no violation. Am I missing something? Thanks,

You are missing something, yeah. It looks like Earwig isn't properly pulling the text from its viewer. If you go to the Heritage link directly and look at the paragraph beginning “The Executive Vesting Clause's general rule…”, the entire paragraph from “is subject to two important limitations” on appears on the Wikipedia page. There's a fair bit of non-copied text between “under the Articles” and “Second, specific constitutional provisions…” on the Wikipedia page, which was added after the original act of copying. Elium2 (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think I removed all of it in this edit, was that it?

Help out at CCI! 01:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

That's all of it, as far as I'm aware, but removing it disrupts the flow of the non-copied parts. It works out okay with the second copied chunk, but not so much with the first. To deal with this, I added a line saying: “Article I grants certain powers to Congress, and the Vesting Clause does not reassign those powers to the President.” I think that deals with the copyright issue. Elium2 (talk) 03:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good then- this particular vio was pretty nasty, I'm honestly not even sure how you found it. Thanks for your assistance,

Help out at CCI! 03:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Neither am I, actually. I think the tone struck me as a bit off, and when I saw the Heritage source linked, I figured I'd take a look for neutrality reasons, since they're a conservative think tank. Instead (well, maybe in addition) I found a copyright issue! Thanks for helping resolve the issue. Elium2 (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Elium2,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Help out at CCI! 12:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you so much! Elium2 (talk) 03:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are invited to join the Help out at CCI! 00:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply ]