User talk:Elshad Iman (Elşad İman)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pomegranate Producers and Exporters Association of Azerbaijan. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gunay Aliyeva (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gunay Aliyeva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gunay Aliyeva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 21:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pomegranate Producers and Exporters Association of Azerbaijan (October 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ezlev was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: If there was consensus in the past to delete this article as non-notable, and this new draft version still doesn't meet notability guidelines, then clearly this organization is not currently notable for Wikipedia.

ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 22:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Wikiazeus per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikiazeus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – bradv^🍁 03:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs independent sources with significant coverage; see

WP:NBOOK

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asian countries in the system of international relations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Asian countries in the system of international relations, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 talk 01:34, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elshad Iman (Elşad İman)! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zoozaz1 talk 01:34, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear admins and Premeditated Chaos, please find out the reason for my blocking [1], I ask you to look into the case and open the block. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear administrator(s) and Mr Yamla, Mr RHaworth, Mr Gilo1969, Mr WikiDan61, Mr Alexf, Mr KylieTastic, Mr MER-C, Mr Yunshui, Mr HJ Mitchell I understand that using multiple accounts is abusing Wikipedia, I'm sorry but I don't have more than one account, please Check User operation. It was after my appeal here that my profile was blocked, but the reason is unknown to me, and this does not justify the blocking of my profile. I am writing to ask you to investigate the reason for my blocking, because the reason for the block is not clear to me. When I investigated the reason, I did not find a complete reason to block the profile, so I can not write in detail. The IP address is 85.132.29.163, the block ID is 11796216. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 11:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The SPI seems pretty convincing, and we very rarely do second checkusers to prove people's asserted innocence. Putting that in your request does not help your cause any. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Premeditated Chaos and SQL, I ask for a reasonable approach to my personal application, I do not have another profile, but they wrote that I was using other profiles. Please contact (Check user) and make sure that I have 1 profile and do not need another one. I want to continue my edits because wikipedia has become my way of life and I ask you to remove the block of my profile. The IP address is 85.132.29.163, the block ID is 11796216. Perhaps they considered the issue that happened in 2019. In 2019, I wrote to the admins that - Please to stop my User:Elshadiman profile and activate Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) profile, because I do my editing with Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) in my Azerbaijani and Russian profiles and I do not need an alternative user profile. Thanks. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 16:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear S Marshall, filelakeshoe, Less Unless, User:Hut 8.5 and Someguy1221 Please comment on this injustice, I recently wrote an article by Azerbaijani journalist Emin Musavi, he is quite an encyclopedic person, but they deleted it, and the reason is completely wrong. Please analyze and comment on why I was blocked?--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 20:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

A tag has been placed on Elshan Orujov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rza Talibov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Edited almost exclusively by a sockpuppet paid edit. The article is about the head of a minor department in a governmental agency, doesn't meet GNG or any other notability standard

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elshan Orujov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Edited almost exclusively by a sockpuppet paid editor, fails GNG and other related notability criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Medal "For services in the education of military patriotism" has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Edited exclusively by a sockpuppet paid editors. Fails GNG and

WP:NAWARDS

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elshad Iman (Elşad İman). It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What has happened: I have appealed to Metawiki to remove my block, I provide you with a link to the discussion: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global/2022-w00#Request_for_Global_unblock As a result of the discussion, I was advised to write to you, so I decided to do it in order to carefully examine the reason for the block, and I want to share this explanation with you. At this link, I asked to undelete an article about a famous comedian and actor, and that's how it all started. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1050742813 For some reason, after this request, the admin blocked my profile unjustly. Later in this link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Elshadiman/Archive#Clerk,_CheckUser,_and/or_patrolling_admin_comments_8 ) It is emphasized that I would two accounts, although Elshad Iman (Elshad Iman) and another account (Elshadiman) are accounts of the same name, and I previously reported on my user page that I would now use my edits from the account "Elshad Iman (Elshad Iman)" and to stop using the other one. In the 3rd request, my application was accepted by the admin and it was reflected in the account where I would use only one account: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Elshad_Iman_(El%C5%9Fad_%C4%B0man)/Archive_1#October_2014 I was blocked for using two accounts. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global/2021-w43#Global_lock_for_Elshadiman_sock(s) I would like to note that I stopped working in one of them and then switched to another. Looking at the statistics of both accounts, it is clear that the block is not justified https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Elshadiman https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Elshad_Iman_(El%C5%9Fad_%C4%B0man) Please give me another chance and restore my profile. 37.26.33.244 (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

 Since you have an unblock request open at User talk:E.Imanoff, where you say that you wish to use only that account in future, I am closing this request. JBW (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Ombuds Commission has looked into your complaint and arrived at the conclusion that it is outside the Commission's scope. The purpose of the Ombuds Commission is to investigate complaints about violations of the global privacy, checkuser or oversighter policies. If you believe that a violation has occurred, please respond to this email and explain why you believe so. Otherwise, please follow up your complaint within the local community of enwiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.26.33.244 (talk) 10:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Above, you wrote "I don't have more than one account", but later you made it clear that you also have the account Elshadiman, and although you haven't explicitly said so, you seem to imply that you have only those two accounts. However, I have found another account which is obviously you, and which appears to admit to being you, though not very coherently. How many accounts do you have? Please give a list of them all, including any which you no longer use. JBW (talk) 22:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Elshad Iman (Elşad İman). It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kadı Message 12:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have received a notification from Wikipedia that you have sent me an email, but no email from you has reached my email account. JBW (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW Hello dear colleague, please give me your e-mail address so that I can send you my application from my official e-mail address.--Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@JBW First of all, I would like to inform you that the steward who released me from the Global Block said that I should contact the wiki admin, i.e. you can, to solve this issue, because the steward's authority is to release me from the Global Block, but he recommended that I contact you for the issue of opening a local account.

Due to editing here I was blocked indefinitely in the english language section and this is not considered a valid block because if this issue is investigated it will cause more pain, because the admin has a bug. I ask you to open this groundless my block. Please Help, I want use all wiki projects with one account.

What steps should I take to resolve this issue?

It was stated in the discussion here that - Ruviki had blocked me because I was still blocked on Enviki, and this discussion said that a user's account could be opened on Ruviki if Enviki considered the user's block unjustified.

I think you can help me unblock my English account. Please fix this issue, if my English account was open I would make my edits to other projects. Please unblock my english account.

My global account is no longer blocked. Upon my promise to use only a single account, can you granting this request?Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 16:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You evaded your block with Bəşir İmanov (

Please go 6 months without socking, and give a complete honest accounting of your past sockpuppetry, before requesting unblock again. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• First of all, Elşad, my apologies for the fact that it has taken me a while to get round to responding here to your requests for help. There have been several reasons for that.
• I have spent a considerable time drafting a message to post here, largely supporting your request for unblock. However, when I was almost ready to post it, I checked some history, and found some things which I had seen before, but forgotten, and which raised some doubts about what I had written. To my knowledge, you have had at least four accounts: Elshadiman, Elshad Iman (Elşad İman), Elshad Iman, and E.Imanoff. In February I asked for clarification as to whether those were all the accounts you had ever had, but you didn't give me a direct answer. Are those all the accounts you have had? I also asked what your connection was to the account Personbaku, to which you said "I know for sure that someone from our office was Personbaku, but I couldn't identify who" Can you explain how you could tell it was someone from your office, without knowing who? It really is essential to give clear answers to these questions, because I am generally willing to consider unblocking you, but I could not easily defend doing so to other administrators as long as they can see sufficient grounds for doubt as to whether your account is complete and accurate, nor would I be entirely happy doing so myself. Also, please explain your use of the account E.Imanoff, which appears to have been created for the sole purpose of evading the blocks on your other accounts. JBW (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello, dear colleague JBW, first of all I want to inform you that this link was the reason for the creation of the E. Imanoff account, that is, it was mentioned here that due to a false global lock, a discussion should be held between the administrators of the local Azerbaijani section, and that the editor should use this account for editing, since he has made a significant contribution to the Azerbaijani Wikipedia.

  As for the user named Personbaku, I use wikipedia at work and therefore came to the conclusion that his name coincides with the public Internet protocol that I use, that is, if two people in the office edit Wikipedia, then they both have the same public Internet protocol is considered edited in Wikipedia. The problem of Internet protocol address conflicts is inevitable, and if so, then I have reason to think so. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 05:08, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, besides these accounts, I have not had any other accounts and never will. All four of my accounts are blocked, this is the only one, Azerbaijani, Russian and Commons sections are open, but English is blocked at the moment, so I turn to you to open it: please open Elshad Iman (Elshad Iman) acoount. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @JBW, I hope my block will open and I look forward to your step in this direction. cheers! Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @

  BradV and JBW:. I find myself not at all convinced to unblock here. Saying the blocking admin has a "bug" is off-putting. But I saw where JBW had discussed and want to defer to y'all. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Hello @JBW and @Deepfriedokra, please forgive me if I have used the wrong words in any of my statements. If you find it appropriate to open my block based on the discussion here, I in turn will take my edits seriously. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 04:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear colleagues Tamzin and JBW, you said to repeat the application after 6 months, I keep my promise, I will no longer use the Sock puppet account, please look at my application again: First of all, I would like to inform you that the steward who released me from the Global Block said that I should contact the wiki admin, i.e. you can, to solve this issue, because the steward's authority is to release me from the Global Block, but he recommended that I contact you for the issue of opening a local account. :Due to editing here I was blocked indefinitely in the english language section and this is not considered a valid block because if this issue is investigated it will cause more pain, because the admin has a bug. I ask you to open this groundless my block. Please Help, I want use all wiki projects with one account. What steps should I take to resolve this issue? :It was stated in the discussion here that - Ruviki had blocked me because I was still blocked on Enviki, and this discussion said that a user's account could be opened on Ruviki if Enviki considered the user's block unjustified. :I think you can help me unblock my English account. Please fix this issue, if my English account was open I would make my edits to other projects. Please unblock my english account. :My global account is no longer blocked. Upon my promise to use only a single account, can you granting this request? Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In response to your last unblock request, since you had just lied about the scope of your sockpuppetry, you were told you would need make a complete and honest account before making another unblock request. If you're not going to be forthright with us, fail to follow basic instructions, and continue to insist that you've done nothing wrong, I see no compelling reason grant this request. Given the number of unsuccessful requests you've made, I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser data shows  Unlikely. That is, the evidence shows no likely reason to believe there's been recent block evasion. Of course, checkuser data can't be certain in cases like this, but that's just my standard disclaimer. --Yamla (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My activity in the Azerbaijan segment. I check articles like patrol. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to email me, there's nothing I can or will do for you.

is closed. User is encouraged to continue editing constructively on other Wikipedias. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]