User talk:EmmaJoanne

Hello, EmmaJoanne! talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Drm310 (talk) 08:30, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply ] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Reliable sources Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Hi EmmaJoanne! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 16:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Jeff A. Stevens should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff A. Stevens .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. EmmaJoanne, thanks for creating Jeff A. Stevens!

I've just tagged the page, using our

.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James T. Morris should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T. Morris .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James T. Ryan should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T. Ryan .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James L. Wainscott should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Wainscott .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide some more context on how you decided to create WP entries for James L. Wainscott, James T. Ryan, James T. Morris, all of which appear to executives who fail GNG?

If you need to, you can review

]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James R. Verrier should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Verrier .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James L. Robo should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Robo .

If you're new to the process,

. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, DOCUMENT★ERROR 09:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lillian Hickey, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nelsonstar.com/news/148997755.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lillian Hickey

Hello EmmaJoanne,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lillian Hickey for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 11:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Euan Anderson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

A page you started (Louise Pleming) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Louise Pleming, EmmaJoanne!

Wikipedia editor MaxBrowne just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment on MaxBrowne's talk page.

Learn more about

.

The article Natela Dzalamidze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This player is

not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category, had no remarkable junior career (neither a Grand Slam champion nor ranked within the world's top 3), and there are no further claims that she is otherwise, at present, generally notable

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jared Preston (talk) 20:50, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natela Dzalamidze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natela Dzalamidze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jared Preston (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great thank you!!!!!!

Though your work is appreciated, please remember to always place atleast one category on new articles like Category:Living people. And that you place a WikiProject at the new articles talk page. You can look at what I have placed on several of your articles. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nathália Rossi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per tennis guidelines. No WTA main draw appearances, no Fed Cup, no $50,000 tournament wins, no notable junior career, does not meet

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linda Jefferson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Jefferson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhang Yong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Yong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tammy Cromer-Campbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammy Cromer-Campbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Vincent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Vincent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tammy Cromer-Campbell, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

.

Thank you for your attention.

]

Hello, EmmaJoanne. It has been over six months since you last edited your

".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

this link

. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article James T. Ryan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable businessperson

WP:NBIO

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James T. Ryan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T. Ryan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James T. Morris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T. Morris (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocumentError (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff A. Stevens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff A. Stevens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocumentError (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven M. Shindler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven M. Shindler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocumentError (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James R. Verrier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Verrier (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocumentError (talk) 16:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]